Live data from Hacker News

Firefox desktop market share now below 9%

netmarketshare.com

701–710 of 755 posts

Re: Firefox desktop market share now below 9%

#701
post #150

I switched last week to Firefox after trying to go back to it over and over again, maybe once a year, for 5+ years. I absolutely love the Container system it has. I was fumbling around between Chrome profiles for GCP and back to my personal for gdrive/docs/etc. It just got cumbersome. I didn't really understand what the Containers were until I installed the extension and started to split up domains by Work and Person…

For contained web apps also see https://wavebox.io/

Re: Firefox desktop market share now below 9%

#703

Time to make another contribution to Mozilla. I have not been using Firefox on my MacBook or iPad, but I recently bought a Linux laptop and as an experiment I am only using Firefox. Nice experience. I might install Chrome just for accessing Google properties because I like to isolate interactions with Google, but that is in no way in criticism of Firefox.

You don't need to install Chrome to isolate Google's properties. Firefox can do that automatically: 1. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/multi-account... 2. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/google-contai... 3. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/facebook-cont...

Thanks, I appreciate the links.

Re: Firefox desktop market share now below 9%

#704

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you on Mac? If yes, it's not a feeling, it's a real problem Mozilla is trying to address but have yet to crack. Firefox is an order of magnitude more performant on windows and linux.

Nope, Windows. Google.com itself spends at least 1 second switching its logo placeholder to its image on Firefox. See here for more: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18055952

Google Chrome is probably talking HTTP3 to its own sites, so not sure that's a fair test.

Re: Firefox desktop market share now below 9%

#705

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nope, Windows. Google.com itself spends at least 1 second switching its logo placeholder to its image on Firefox. See here for more: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18055952

Google Chrome is probably talking HTTP3 to its own sites, so not sure that's a fair test.

This isn't because of that. Although even if it was, my entire point was that at the end of the day if Firefox is slower, even if it's Google playing dirty, that's going to make users like me not want to use it over Chrome.

Re: Firefox desktop market share now below 9%

#706

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I use OpenAnd for maps/navigation installed from fdroid (although I've paid for it previously on Play). I find it does everything I want.

Did you mean OsmAnd? I couldn't find anything named "OpenAnd".

Yes. Sorry. When I was typing it I was thinking, "That doesn't seem right!", but I couldn't get my brain in gear.

Re: Firefox desktop market share now below 9%

#707
post #665
post #471

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Have you tried Brave? Works flawlessly for me, and quite a bit faster than FF.

Just try and the first impression, it is a lot faster than FF. Thanks.

I've just notice that Brave doesn't block ads in search engine.

Re: Firefox desktop market share now below 9%

#708
post #557

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As someone with a domain at home and a working email server, I'm still stuck with Gmail as I don't have time to make sure my setup is resilient enough to base my daily emails on... It's a sad world and we're a very geeky crowd.

> As someone with a domain at home and a working email server Maintaining your own email server is crazy and not feasible unless you're passionate about email servers. It's also a false dichotomy. Nobody with any experience and common sense suggests that you should install your own email server. Use FastMail, use Protonmail, use Office 365, heck, use Google's G Suite. Most such services have import tools that work an…

> Maintaining your own email server is crazy and not feasible unless you're passionate about email servers.

Sorry but I think this is FUD and it potentially discouraged people from taking steps to be part of the solution and not the problem.

I’ve run my own mail server for years on a $5/mo Linode VPS, and am not passionate about email servers. It was a little difficult to set up but no more difficult than a lot of weekend projects the smart people on this site undertake. It should not be scary. You can also make the switch gradually by first setting up your MX and forwarding to gmail if you want to take it slow. There’s no reason anyone with a moderate amount of Linux skills and patience can’t host their own Email.

Re: Firefox desktop market share now below 9%

#709
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> 2. Anecdotal evidence, but every time an update of Firefox (and most notably Quantum) is released people laud how fast it is. On my 2015 Macbook running Mac OS Firefox has never been faster. Maybe there are things behind the scenes such as caching playing a role, but web pages load slower, scrolling feels sluggish, videos drop frames and freeze or get out of sync. It isn't an enjoyable experience compared to Chrome…

Really? I'm on Linux and I saw immediate changes once Quantum hit. It runs better for me on Ubuntu{16,18} and Arch. I had some glitches at the beginning, but not anymore. The only glitch I have now is that I can't use send tabs to push a tab to my phone (but the reverse works and it is fine to any other computer). So that's not that big of an issue.

I wish I had your experience. But I switched from Chrome when Quantum came out, and it felt like a big downgrade in performance. And I feel that is still the case these days when comparing Firefox and Chrome. Granted, I hadn't used Firefox prior to the Quantum release for a long time because of the performance so I likely didn't notice the improvement as you did.

I just wish it was better, because while it does get annoying at times, I do want to support Mozilla :-/

Re: Firefox desktop market share now below 9%

#710
post #452

Reading this breaks my heart. I have been a Firefox user for almost a decade now and I have good and bad memories with it. Since Quantum release my experience with FF has been nothing but exceptional. On a general day I have around ~15 pinned tabs and more than 50 other tabs open and FF handles it like a breeze. The memory usage is good given the fact that my workload is heavy. On a dual-core machine, I am able to re…

I regularly have several hundred tabs open without issue. I have occasionally had over a thousand in very long running sessions.

I’ve been a very happy Firefox user since Phoenix days.

Post reply on HN