The opioid epidemic is an amazing example of human psychology and the power of a visual. More people die from it every year than Vietnam, yet there's been no large public outcry to resolve the situation because it isn't right in your face like a 9/11 or pearl harbor. Even ignoring the human impact and just going to economics, those lost lives will cost the US billions in lost productivity over time, yet nobody really…
Someone replied to you with an ignorant comment that was deleted. I'm copy/pasting it here anyway because they are spewing common misconceptions that need to be squashed. > The US has 330 million people. Do we really care if a bunch self-select out of the gene pool? While some people do choose to use drugs with their own free will, this epidemic isn't about that. Many people getting addicted have been initially presc…
I'm not sure the comments are made out of ignorance as much as desperation.
Imagine an audience member telling a DJ: "Hey, I liked your stuff. But I kept hearing a bunch of pops and clicks in the music. Was there something wrong with your system?"
And the DJ says, "No, my system was just discarding the samples that self-selected to miss realtime deadlines. Good riddance, I say!"
We need a name for this fallacy: perhaps the "Unsampling Fallacy?" That is, morally attacking samples in an attempt to characterize the very system for which you were supposed to analyze those samples to gain insights into it.
It's glaring with the DSP example but insidious when it's humans being sampled.