Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just curious, are you running the development version of sway 1.0, or the older stable 0.15?
master branch of wlroots + sway (I update nearly ever hour). Sway is the most exciting thing going on right now. Sway is really fast, I don't think the slowness is a problem with sway. I am wondering if my x220's Intel card is just too slow. I will try shortly on a much faster system.
PSA: Firefox Nightly now with experimental Wayland support
21–30 of 101 posts
Re: PSA: Firefox Nightly now with experimental Wayland support
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, then you might look into this guy who modifies x200/x201's with 8th gen Intel chip sets. I think this is a good starting point to find more information about it. Its called the x210. http://www.cnmod.cn/x210
Wow, that looks really cool. Do you happen to know how much they cost?
The price goes up on the x200/x220s the nicer they look, and if they work, but you are looking at a max price of $250 if you don't wait for the good deals.
Re: PSA: Firefox Nightly now with experimental Wayland support
#23That's great! How is WebRender on Wayland + Vulkan progressing by the way? I'm still postponing switch to Wayland, until major KWin bugs (like flickering one) are fixed.
Alas, setting about:config gfx.webrender.all to true results in the window being blank, if using it in native wayland mode.
Apparently there's some upstream improvements coming to kwayland that will help.
WebRender itself is very stable. So much so that it is on by default for beta users on Windows with Nvidia. Recent weeks have also saw much better memory usage.
Re: PSA: Firefox Nightly now with experimental Wayland support
#24Re: PSA: Firefox Nightly now with experimental Wayland support
#25That's great! How is WebRender on Wayland + Vulkan progressing by the way? I'm still postponing switch to Wayland, until major KWin bugs (like flickering one) are fixed.
I'm running the nightly on KWin and wayland right now, and typing this from there. Alas, setting about:config gfx.webrender.all to true results in the window being blank, if using it in native wayland mode. Apparently there's some upstream improvements coming to kwayland that will help. WebRender itself is very stable. So much so that it is on by default for beta users on Windows with Nvidia. Recent weeks have also s…
KWin itslef still has this bug which is very irritating: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387313
Re: PSA: Firefox Nightly now with experimental Wayland support
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wow, that looks really cool. Do you happen to know how much they cost?
If I recall -- I was reading the board + CPU was around $450, and you can pick up a x200 for ~$100 and do the mod your self. The price goes up on the x200/x220s the nicer they look, and if they work, but you are looking at a max price of $250 if you don't wait for the good deals.
Re: PSA: Firefox Nightly now with experimental Wayland support
#27Great! I recently set up desktop Linux, and was disappointed to find poor support for fractional scaling on HiDPI screens, which I’m used to coming from retina MacBook Pro. Gnome under X11 only has 1x, 2x and 3x scaling. In Wayland, Gnome has experimental support for fractional scaling - including 1.75x, the size I’m used to. However, Xwayland apps like Firefox stable (and chrome) render blurry with fractional scalin…
Re: PSA: Firefox Nightly now with experimental Wayland support
#28Great! I recently set up desktop Linux, and was disappointed to find poor support for fractional scaling on HiDPI screens, which I’m used to coming from retina MacBook Pro. Gnome under X11 only has 1x, 2x and 3x scaling. In Wayland, Gnome has experimental support for fractional scaling - including 1.75x, the size I’m used to. However, Xwayland apps like Firefox stable (and chrome) render blurry with fractional scalin…
Re: PSA: Firefox Nightly now with experimental Wayland support
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
Isn't that laptop from like 6 years ago? I'd imagine your GPU is very much considered legacy.
This isn't 2002 where single core performance had increased by 4x and average ram has quadrupled. Computers can now easily have a 10 year usable lifespan. Heck Nvidia provides drivers for your modern kernel for devices all the way back to 2007.
Maybe 4x is your cut-off point for where it's worth it to upgrade?