Live data from Hacker News

Gab.com banned from PayPal

twitter.com

121–130 of 203 posts

Re: Gab.com banned from PayPal

#121
post #115
post #76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Torba had an unrelated YC startup during the batch that was running during the 2016 election season. He was ejected from YC for harassing batch-mates; there's an HN thread about it you can find in the search bar. He started Gab at just about the same time as he was kicked out of YC.

> He was ejected from YC for harassing batch-mates; there's an HN thread about it you can find in the search bar This? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12934388

I think so?

Re: Gab.com banned from PayPal

#122

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't understand what you're trying to claim. Are you suggesting the owners of Gab are anti-Semitic?

I’m suggesting that people who cry “freedom of speech” when others won’t do business with them, while simultaneously suppressing dissent among their own ranks, are using it as a rhetorical weapon rather than as a principle they follow but I completely.

I agree with you, but in this situation, who is "suppressing dissent among their own ranks"?

Re: Gab.com banned from PayPal

#123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Alt-right conspiracy nuts != free speech.

Gab may have a large number of alt-right conspiracy nuts, but they also have a lot of users who rightfully mock those nutty people. It really is a platform for pure free speech. Unfortunately, its polarization was inevitable as Twitter and Reddit started cracking down on far-right users, leaving only pure free speech websites left for the crazies. But suggesting the website itself condones violence or sympathizes wit…

I don't know what "neo-Nazi" means to you, but if you'd like, we can refine our terminology and simply talk about "white supremacists and anti-Semites", at which point if will become very difficult for you to argue that the site doesn't "condone or sympathize with" those forces.

Re: Gab.com banned from PayPal

#124
post #25

Financial censorship is still censorship

Paypal is not the government. Stop this absurd misrepresentation of censorship.

Payment processors are government licensed oligopolies and if private processors can deny service for no reason, then the goverment should set up its own with a universal service obligation.

If making and receiving payments is considered a necessary utility posting and handling large amounts of cash is restricted, then providers should not have a right to deny service to customers who are not taking payments in violation of the law, regardless of distasteful their activities may be.

Would you agree if the state sided with electrical or water utilities to be able to refuse service to a customer such as brothel, on the grounds that their activitites where distasteful and immoral, not matter how legal?

That would be fine if the person denied service had the right to connect to a river or a well, lay down their own pipes and power and draw their water and electricity directly, but those rights are curtailed by the state, and it requires certain permissions and rights to do those.

The same can be said of online payments and credit card payments. They have become a necessary utility so much so that brothels and panhandlers have credit card machines. If private providers can deny such service arbitrarily then the state must become the providers of last resort.

Re: Gab.com banned from PayPal

#125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Alt-right conspiracy nuts != free speech.

Gab may have a large number of alt-right conspiracy nuts, but they also have a lot of users who rightfully mock those nutty people. It really is a platform for pure free speech. Unfortunately, its polarization was inevitable as Twitter and Reddit started cracking down on far-right users, leaving only pure free speech websites left for the crazies. But suggesting the website itself condones violence or sympathizes wit…

suggesting the website itself condones violence or sympathizes with neo-Nazis isn't accurate.

It's pretty accurate. They sound like Nazis. Take a look at

https://twitter.com/ClenchedFisk/status/1027690034718224384

https://twitter.com/Popehat/status/1056332670513233920

https://twitter.com/Popehat/status/1056266704148262912

Re: Gab.com banned from PayPal

#126
post #61

Good. Now for Stripe. I already called their customer support this morning and told them I'd pull my organization's account unless they dropped Gab. I'm sure I'm not the only customer who has. They enable payments processing for Gab, which means that they also profit from Gab. They make money off the alt-right. They choose to make money off the alt-right. You want protests in front of your office, Stripe, raising hel…

Gab is a free speech platform. Free speech != white supremacist

It's possible to focus on free speech without encouraging white supremacists.

That doesn't seem to be Gab's goal.

Re: Gab.com banned from PayPal

#127

Good. Now for Stripe. I already called their customer support this morning and told them I'd pull my organization's account unless they dropped Gab. I'm sure I'm not the only customer who has. They enable payments processing for Gab, which means that they also profit from Gab. They make money off the alt-right. They choose to make money off the alt-right. You want protests in front of your office, Stripe, raising hel…

Your virtue signalling is so cringeworthy

Re: Gab.com banned from PayPal

#128

Good. Now for Stripe. I already called their customer support this morning and told them I'd pull my organization's account unless they dropped Gab. I'm sure I'm not the only customer who has. They enable payments processing for Gab, which means that they also profit from Gab. They make money off the alt-right. They choose to make money off the alt-right. You want protests in front of your office, Stripe, raising hel…

Your virtue signalling is so cringeworthy

One of the members of our board of directors was almost killed there this morning, but she overslept and missed shul, and so was saved.

We’ll stick with our virtue.

Re: Gab.com banned from PayPal

#129
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Paypal is not the government. Stop this absurd misrepresentation of censorship.

Payment processors are government licensed oligopolies and if private processors can deny service for no reason, then the goverment should set up its own with a universal service obligation. If making and receiving payments is considered a necessary utility posting and handling large amounts of cash is restricted, then providers should not have a right to deny service to customers who are not taking payments in viola…

This is exactly the fight you should be having -- the government should be a universal payment processor. I agree wholeheartedly. I am arguing again the people who state that a corporation should be obligated to serve a non-protected class.

if private processors can deny service for no reason

Ah yes, the "no reason" of being violence-inciting Nazis. What a reasonless judgement.

Re: Gab.com banned from PayPal

#130
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Gab is a free speech platform. Free speech != white supremacist

It's possible to focus on free speech without encouraging white supremacists. That doesn't seem to be Gab's goal.

How, I would love to hear solutions.

People like asparagirl will not join a free speech platform because her speech isn't really restricted from the non-free speech platforms. The people who have the biggest incentive to join these platforms are the one which are kicked out from all the other networks.

Post reply on HN