Live data from Hacker News

Gab.com banned from PayPal

twitter.com

91–100 of 203 posts

Re: Gab.com banned from PayPal

#91
post #36

I appreciate that fact that you can tell this is all just a front for beliefs they don't have. I mean if they really believe in free speech you would assume they would have mentioned Julian Assange or Wikileaks once. It would have made a lot more sense if they had ever mentioned how dangerous the censorship of Wikileaks by monetary means was. Fortunately they never did this so you can reasonably assume it is a front.

Are you talking about Paypal or the banned organization?

Re: Gab.com banned from PayPal

#92
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I strongly believe that it's not.

If PayPal bans Gab because they dislike the speech available on Gab, it is literally an attack on Free Speech. I understand you feel differently.

I don't know what Gab is, or what its typical content is like, though I'm getting an idea from the replies to this tweet. But the principle of free speech has nothing to do with the right of a company to use Paypal's services. It's to do with the right of individuals to say what they like without government incarcerating or otherwise harming them or their ability to speak.

Re: Gab.com banned from PayPal

#93
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

PayPal is a profit-oriented company, not the "left" - whatever that boogeyman means. A company that doesn't want to support one of the most vitriolic, hateful platforms on the internet. Speech has consequences and can turn violent and this platform welcomed these people and this hate speech (by explicitly catering to those that got banned from other services etc). Relevant: https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/201…

In America, here is no such thing as "hate speech", America has "free speech".

We don't (generally) have laws against hate speech. That's not the same thing as saying there is no such thing as hate speech.

Re: Gab.com banned from PayPal

#94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are they doing anything illegal?

In most countries, yes. But illegality is not the issue here. People simply have a right not to be associated with hate.

> a right not to be associated with hate

This is neither a right in any theoretical system of human rights I've seen, nor is there any practical way to disassociate people from a basic human emotion.

Re: Gab.com banned from PayPal

#95
post #90
post #36

I appreciate that fact that you can tell this is all just a front for beliefs they don't have. I mean if they really believe in free speech you would assume they would have mentioned Julian Assange or Wikileaks once. It would have made a lot more sense if they had ever mentioned how dangerous the censorship of Wikileaks by monetary means was. Fortunately they never did this so you can reasonably assume it is a front.

Most people who believe in free speech only believe in freedom for their speech. That's just the way people are. Extremists cry foul that their free speech rights are being violated or that they're being censored but within their own groups they would quickly stamp out opposing ideas or criticism.

They do this because they see words as weapons to be used against their enemies, nothing more. It’s not that they believe in freedom of speech incompletely. They just know that freedom of speech is something other people care about, and it can be used as a rhetorical weapon.

“Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.”

Re: Gab.com banned from PayPal

#96

Good. Now for Stripe. I already called their customer support this morning and told them I'd pull my organization's account unless they dropped Gab. I'm sure I'm not the only customer who has. They enable payments processing for Gab, which means that they also profit from Gab. They make money off the alt-right. They choose to make money off the alt-right. You want protests in front of your office, Stripe, raising hel…

I assume from your pissed-off tone and what you say that you are a some sort of leftist wanna-be activist.

Aren't you guys for free speech and minorities? Stopping alt-right (a minority) exercising their right to free speech doesn't seem like a good cause to pursue.

It's getting so annoying how leftists want to silence anyone that doesn't agree with them. This is part of the reason why people are abandoning your ideology in droves, at least in Europe.

Haven't you become the very thing you think you're fighting, or am I missing something?

Re: Gab.com banned from PayPal

#97
post #61

Good. Now for Stripe. I already called their customer support this morning and told them I'd pull my organization's account unless they dropped Gab. I'm sure I'm not the only customer who has. They enable payments processing for Gab, which means that they also profit from Gab. They make money off the alt-right. They choose to make money off the alt-right. You want protests in front of your office, Stripe, raising hel…

Gab is a free speech platform. Free speech != white supremacist

Free speech is free speech. Even if you don't like what people say (or perhaps specially when you don't like it).

Re: Gab.com banned from PayPal

#99
post #65

It's funny how those who cry hardest about being censored, when given a completely free space to express themselves, fill it to the brim with xenophobia, racism, fake news and outlandish conspiracy theories involving the Clintons https://gab.com/popular

Only in this particular cultural context. In the context of the Arab Spring such a platform would have very different content. What does seem to be the case is that every time someone attempts to deplatform the people writing about the subjects you listed, their audience grows instead of shrinks. What is the ultimate goal here because it seems like the deplatforming movement is spreading the ideas they oppose much further than these people ever could have on their own.

Is there a belief that we'll eventually reach a point where every single platform accessible to humanity is closed to those with ideas that we find unsavory? If not, then all of this seems to be causing much more harm than good as each attempt to silence them turns into a megaphone.

Re: Gab.com banned from PayPal

#100
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Paypal is not the government. Stop this absurd misrepresentation of censorship.

Stop the absurd misrepresentation that only the government censor.

That is literally true. Paypal is choosing not to do business with someone. Is your preference that companies must be forced to conduct business with all comers?
Post reply on HN