probably not a popular opinion but I think the best way to reduce your carbon foot print is not to have children
True, but taking your argument to it's logical extreme suicide would work even better.
If you want to save the world, veganism isn’t the answer
11–20 of 114 posts
Re: If you want to save the world, veganism isn’t the answer
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, it's successfully and continuously convincing others to suicide by any means necessary. And it's not the logical extension by the way. Not creating is not the same as destroying.
[flagged]
Re: If you want to save the world, veganism isn’t the answer
#13Re: If you want to save the world, veganism isn’t the answer
#14probably not a popular opinion but I think the best way to reduce your carbon foot print is not to have children
You'd never consider yourself to be part of your parents carbon footprint, in need of "reduction", would you?
In a global sense, sure less population means less carbon footprint, but that isn't the end-goal of civilization. To me, the end goal of civilization is life---human life in all its myriad ways, and to its utmost fulfilment. An earth without humans is a poorer earth.
Re: If you want to save the world, veganism isn’t the answer
#15probably not a popular opinion but I think the best way to reduce your carbon foot print is not to have children
Re: If you want to save the world, veganism isn’t the answer
#16probably not a popular opinion but I think the best way to reduce your carbon foot print is not to have children
Everyone's social security hinges of having just as many people contributing to it today. China had to rid it's one child policy, and Japan is facing a similar problem. How do you support twice as many old people with only half as many working young folk.
I'm migration may be the answer, but if the rise of "nationalist" movements around the world is any indication. Then natives don't quite want immigrants to be that solution.
Re: If you want to save the world, veganism isn’t the answer
#17Re: If you want to save the world, veganism isn’t the answer
#18probably not a popular opinion but I think the best way to reduce your carbon foot print is not to have children
But that does not rule out other methods of reduction as well.
A vegan having no children has a smaller footprint than a carbivore having no children.
Re: If you want to save the world, veganism isn’t the answer
#19Unless I am missing something, this is really not helping the world. This would amount to something like 0.05 million calories/acre/year.
If I compare that to others (http://www.waldeneffect.org/blog/Calories_per_acre_for_vario...) this doesn't seem like a realistic way to feed the global population.
Re: If you want to save the world, veganism isn’t the answer
#20probably not a popular opinion but I think the best way to reduce your carbon foot print is not to have children
I don't particularly care about the planet, but I agree with you. What irks me more is that there is an element of consent involved with birth. Life is mostly suffering and struggle for the majority, and it is a mean thing to bring someone into existence and have them deal with the meaninglessness and misery that is existence, all by themselves so. And what happens when they can't cope, or they don't follow the rules…
I'd seriously consider seeking out a psychologist, they are really good. There's so much light out there in the world.