Live data from Hacker News

Why work has failed us: Because no one can afford to retire anymore

fastcompany.com

81–90 of 147 posts

Re: Why work has failed us: Because no one can afford to retire anymore

#81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Gonna insert my anecdata here. "no millennials" is just wrong. I'm a millennial (Though just barely, born in '82), and I fully expect to retire by 67, possibly by 65, and if markets do well, maybe even 62, and I didn't even begin saving for retirement until 3 years ago. I always question how many millennials complaining about student loan debt either didn't actually finish their degree, or they got a degree that does…

> they got a degree that doesn't lead to gainful employment due to lack of research before choosing a major, or they let themselves be bullshitted by some university's marketing and wayyyyy overpaid for their degree. Correct. But this happens because not everyone is privileged enough to get good advice. The vast majority of 18 year olds know nothing, they've seen none of the world, and can only rely on the little kno…

> The vast majority of 18 year olds know nothing, they've seen none of the world, and can only rely on the little knowledge they've acquired up to that point in their life.

Which is why IMO, we should stop pushing 18 year olds into college. Let them work a full-time job somewhere and live outside of their parents' place for a few years go get a feel for the real world.

> society's advice has been it's "go to college, a college degree means you'll make so much more money and even at the cost of $200k in debt will be worth it"

Society sucks and definitely needs to stop saying that kind of BS.

> It's one thing to say "capitalism is how things fall naturally." It's another to say "this is perfect and how it should work and nothing's broken, everyone gets their just desserts, capitalism is the only way, move along." I'm not saying that this is actually what you're trying to convey, but the anecdote you inserted here definitely rings of this (common) sentiment.

I have a friend that's constantly sharing stuff from /r/LateStageCapitalism and it makes me roll my eyes.

IMO, Capitalism is a necessary evil to encourage innovation and reward hard work. The problem is that it also leads to abuse of workers, blaming the poor for being poor, worship of money, idolization of the rich, and most annoyingly, the idea that everyone that is rich is rich because they worked hard, and not because they inherited wealth. At the very least, people frequently don't acknowledge that many wealthy CEOs that built their company from their garage still started wealthy and had access to the funding to get an Ivy League education plus their own money to kickstart their company. Bill Gates's dad was a lawyer, his mom served on the board of directors at a bank, and he went to a private school as a child and then to Harvard. To say he pulled himself up by his bootstraps would be highly misleading. Trump even said he got a loan from his father for $1mill to start his businesses, and some of his followers STILL think he's a self-made man. But I've digressed...

The TL;DR is that capitalism sucks, but it sucks less than the alternatives.

> talk to a few people who are the first to get college degrees in their family.

That would be myself.

I like to think I can truly call myself self-made. I moved out of my parent's place when I was 21 with mostly nothing but a full-time job in retail. I paid for my rent, my apartment deposit, all my furniture/appliances, and my PC. My parents gave me nothing. I had been a huge slacker in high school and didn't even have my diploma. When I was 27 (2009), I decided I was done working a low-wage job, got my GED, and started going to college. 4 1/2 years later, spring of 2014, I had a Bachelor's in Computer Science and $43,000 in student loan debt. I got a job as a software engineer a few weeks after graduation, and about two years ago, moved to a job in application security. I own a house, a respectable car, and I take nice vacations. I'm the quintessential middle class now.

Other than a couple thousand dollars in Pell grants and my student loans over the course of the time I was in college, I have never received financial assistance from anyone. I've never been on SNAP/food stamps/etc.

And yet I try to have empathy for those that are in such dire straights that pulling themselves out is next to impossible. I recognize that the apartment I lived in when I first started going to college in 2009 was $650/month, but is now $950/month, while wages haven't kept up. I recognize that many retail and fast food businesses often avoid hiring people full-time, so the poor end up needing to work two jobs with unpredictable hours to pay the bills. I could go on.

> The gap is widening between rich and poor, straight-up capitalism exacerbates those effects, and I don't think it's easy to argue that's a good thing.

I absolutely agree 100%. The gap is widening and it's a terrible thing. But I feel that some millennials are using it as a scapegoat when they made their own bad choices, like going to an out-of-state university for an art degree.

Re: Why work has failed us: Because no one can afford to retire anymore

#82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is not emphasized enough: prior to the last 100 years, the concept of retirement as currently visualized simply did not exist. You had kids, and the kids took care of you in your old age (or you just had a terrible old age). A very small number of people had the resource base to survive growing old gracefully: Social Security was an attempt to extend that to all on a consistent basis. That's not to say some form…

I’m curious too. What’s the solution? Life expectancy keeps going up, but the age at which our bodies can no longer work has stayed relatively flat. People are living long past when they can no longer work. Fact. Society needs to solve this or we risk letting the elderly starve on the street.

If someone is unproductive and can't/won't work, then people shouldn't be obligated to give him/her the fruits of their labor.

Re: Why work has failed us: Because no one can afford to retire anymore

#83
post #82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’m curious too. What’s the solution? Life expectancy keeps going up, but the age at which our bodies can no longer work has stayed relatively flat. People are living long past when they can no longer work. Fact. Society needs to solve this or we risk letting the elderly starve on the street.

If someone is unproductive and can't/won't work, then people shouldn't be obligated to give him/her the fruits of their labor.

I hope you don’t suddenly become disabled or chronically ill without a support network, with that attitude.

Re: Why work has failed us: Because no one can afford to retire anymore

#84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're getting downvoted because it's a message people dont want to hear. We have advanced our standard of living, but haven't kept up our standard of responsibility. Our parents/grandparents didnt have videogame consoles, laptops, phones, coffee besides cheap store drip, meals out more than 1x per month, tattoos, anything from a spa etc. All of those were likely dumped into home equity (owning your home was the pred…

> Our parents/grandparents didnt have videogame consoles, laptops, phones, coffee besides cheap store drip, meals out more than 1x per month, tattoos, anything from a spa etc. They also didn’t have six figure student loan debt, and their housing costs were not 50-75% of their salary. Video games and cell phones are small potatoes—-not what is keeping the current generation financially insecure, but they are visible “…

> and their housing costs were not 50-75% of their salary

But our grandparents did predominately live in rural areas. You can still live quite affordably in rural areas now. Most people just aren't happy with that lifestyle anymore.

Additionally, the majority of our grandparents didn't own their homes. If the majority of us were okay with renting like our grandparents were, you wouldn't see the irrational behaviour of buying at any cost that pushes the market beyond what is sensible (i.e. paying 75% of salary for no reason).

Re: Why work has failed us: Because no one can afford to retire anymore

#85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're getting downvoted because it's a message people dont want to hear. We have advanced our standard of living, but haven't kept up our standard of responsibility. Our parents/grandparents didnt have videogame consoles, laptops, phones, coffee besides cheap store drip, meals out more than 1x per month, tattoos, anything from a spa etc. All of those were likely dumped into home equity (owning your home was the pred…

> Our parents/grandparents didnt have videogame consoles, laptops, phones, coffee besides cheap store drip, meals out more than 1x per month, tattoos, anything from a spa etc. They also didn’t have six figure student loan debt, and their housing costs were not 50-75% of their salary. Video games and cell phones are small potatoes—-not what is keeping the current generation financially insecure, but they are visible “…

> housing costs were not 50-75% of their salary

75% is far above what any reasonable person would recommend to be the maximum portion of salary that should be spent on housing. Personally, my housing is around 25% of my posttax income, and I thought I was pushing it a bit.

This isn't a generations problem, this is a supreme-ignorance problem.

Re: Why work has failed us: Because no one can afford to retire anymore

#86
post #80
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

According to the article you linked, based on your age (I'm in the same cohort), the average 401k is worth $91,000. Are you not contributing at all to your 401k? Did you get a late start, or have some hardship that required you to break into the 401k (divorce in my case)? I've never heard the 3x annual salary in savings, but that also seems super extreme. Assume a salary of $100K per year... No one I know has ~ $300K…

The 3x the article states means total retirement savings. 401k included. I really hope you know more than a few people with 300k in 401k if they earn 100k/year.

Ah, I was confused by the parent post, I thought we were discussing 401k and "savings" as separate things.

I'm not sure what others have saved in theirs, but in my case, it was more like $200,000 in my 401k when I got divorced at age 40. I didn't always earn the same income as I do now, and also had times where I have needed to decrease my contributions, etc.

Re: Why work has failed us: Because no one can afford to retire anymore

#87

It's interesting that while people claim they can't afford to retire, more than half of the population begins collecting Social Security in the US at age 62 ( https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-people-who-claim-socia... ) when those on disability are included.

I have no facts at my disposal, but I'm left to ponder how many of those early collectors do so because they are under-employed, unable to find work, suffer disabilities, perhaps are no longer physically able to do the work for which they were trained, or other causes such that it is a practical decision on their part, recognizing that they have no other form of stable income.

In poor, rural counties? It's the entire social safety net: https://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/local/2017/06/02/generatio...

Re: Why work has failed us: Because no one can afford to retire anymore

#88
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Our parents/grandparents didnt have videogame consoles, laptops, phones, coffee besides cheap store drip, meals out more than 1x per month, tattoos, anything from a spa etc. They also didn’t have six figure student loan debt, and their housing costs were not 50-75% of their salary. Video games and cell phones are small potatoes—-not what is keeping the current generation financially insecure, but they are visible “…

> housing costs were not 50-75% of their salary 75% is far above what any reasonable person would recommend to be the maximum portion of salary that should be spent on housing. Personally, my housing is around 25% of my posttax income, and I thought I was pushing it a bit. This isn't a generations problem, this is a supreme-ignorance problem.

> 75% is far above what I or any reasonable person would recommend to be the maximum portion of salary that should be spent on housing.

Two rules of thumb i've heard are: 1) Do not mortgage more than 4x your annual salary (household if double income) . 2) Do not pay more than 20x annual rent for a place (eg, $50k annualized rent == $1M house) .

Another way to rephrase an ignorance problem is a lack of education problem. On one hand we're all adults and ought to keep trying to learn whatever will benefit us best (ie "Financial education") , on the other hand those tasked with educating us have failed us (parents, school system) .

Re: Why work has failed us: Because no one can afford to retire anymore

#89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're getting downvoted because it's a message people dont want to hear. We have advanced our standard of living, but haven't kept up our standard of responsibility. Our parents/grandparents didnt have videogame consoles, laptops, phones, coffee besides cheap store drip, meals out more than 1x per month, tattoos, anything from a spa etc. All of those were likely dumped into home equity (owning your home was the pred…

> Our parents/grandparents didnt have videogame consoles, laptops, phones, coffee besides cheap store drip, meals out more than 1x per month, tattoos, anything from a spa etc. They also didn’t have six figure student loan debt, and their housing costs were not 50-75% of their salary. Video games and cell phones are small potatoes—-not what is keeping the current generation financially insecure, but they are visible “…

> Baby Boomers can point to and try to shame people over.

I'm not a baby boomer and IMO people shouldn't both consume luxuries whilst complaining they cannot afford necessities (IMO retirement is a need), irrespective of how "small" the potatoes are, they add up and compound.

Re: Why work has failed us: Because no one can afford to retire anymore

#90
post #45

Per https://www.valuepenguin.com/average-credit-card-debt#income ; the lower income earners in the US have almost 10% of their income in credit card debt. Per https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/fact-shee... 12 million people spend $9 billion in payday loan fees and people spend billions of dollars each year playing the lottery. Poor financial decisions and money management is definitely playing a role…

> payday loan fees ... playing the lottery ... poor financial decisions and money management ... predatory lending ... consumer spending

Those are all basically taxes on idiocy and innumeracy.

Idiocy and innumeracy are arguably vices whose prevalence in society should be counteracted.

In the absence of the abject and horrifying immorality/aggression/violence of state eugenics, isn't taxation the next most effective thing?

Post reply on HN