Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm a prison abolitionist. Your reply could not possibly fall on ears that care less about your point.
You were the one who mentioned financial incentives/conflicts vis-a-vis private prisons.
should you construct an argument only by its premise, or should you try to reach the person? I think [s]he assumed that you are not a prison abolitionist and tried to find an argument that might sway you.
Is it better or worse to argue like that?