Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or just legislate that feed manufacturers must add the algae?
There couldn't possibly be any unintended side effects of that...
Seaweed in Cow Feed Reduces Methane Emissions Almost Entirely
181–190 of 282 posts
Re: Seaweed in Cow Feed Reduces Methane Emissions Almost Entirely
#182Does the methane get released after the cow has finished digestion and the manure is left to rot? The carbon has to go somewhere if it's not turned into methane inside the cow.
Apparently most bovine-sourced methane comes from the burp part of the cycle rather than the fart. Manure may actually come in third when it comes to methane and the cow. Like humans (86%!), I suspect most carbon that passes through a cow is exhaled as carbon dioxide.
That would mean that the cow gets higher nutritional value and can needs less food.
Re: Seaweed in Cow Feed Reduces Methane Emissions Almost Entirely
#183Earlier quoted context omitted.
A carbon tax or cap and trade system would create such an economic incentive.
What's to discourage the cattle owner from claiming their cows produce no methane due to seaweed use & then collecting the cap and trade/carbon tax benefit while not bothering with the seaweed? More broadly, how does cap and trade/carbon tax measure the footprint of a business in the first place? I've found no material on the subject but my guess is that they do it based on the power plant/fuel you're using & how muc…
Re: Seaweed in Cow Feed Reduces Methane Emissions Almost Entirely
#184Earlier quoted context omitted.
What if it turns out to make healthier cows? I'm not just making that up, I think it will probably have a positive effect - cows need iodine too! Not sure if it's enough to sway farmers.
Can't believe this comment is the only mention of iodine in both the thread and the article. I supplement iodine daily and it's honestly changed my life.
Re: Seaweed in Cow Feed Reduces Methane Emissions Almost Entirely
#185Earlier quoted context omitted.
One also has to consider that the methane decays over a matter of decades. Other than CO2, which stays in the atmosphere until it is taken out. So, even if methane takes a big share in current greenhouse emissions, its share in the accumulated greenhouse gases in the atmosphere will be lower. The climate change it causes is temporary. (Disregarding runaway effects.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_methane
Decades – we don't have decades to fix this. Also, it decays into CO2, so to claim that its effects are temporary is misleading. On top of that, as long as the carbon is in a CH4 bond, it traps at least 20× as much radiation. Please don't dismiss the significance of methane emissions.
Re: Seaweed in Cow Feed Reduces Methane Emissions Almost Entirely
#186Serious question, what incentive is there for this to be done on a large scale by anyone? The EPA is being systematically dismantled and the official line of the government (or at least, those in charge of the government) is that climate change is not man made. If it is just a natural process, how could our food systems have any impact on it? I can't imagine how this wouldn't add at least some costs to feed prices, a…
Re: Seaweed in Cow Feed Reduces Methane Emissions Almost Entirely
#187Earlier quoted context omitted.
> My understanding is that around half of the world's greenhouse gas comes from livestock That's not right. The highest number I've been able to find for the whole of agriculture is 24% of world greenhouse gas emissions. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-emiss... About 25% of that is methane from livestock ( http://old.grida.no/graphicslib/detail/greenhouse-gas-emissi... ) So livestock is about 6…
Random Gaurdian story puts methane : "Methane accounted for about 16% of global greenhouse gas emissions in 2015, according to the IPCC." ( https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/sep/29/methane-... ) Wikipedia puts (with some question about the citation) methan at 4-9% of total greenhouse effect contribution, and CO2 at 9-26%. (And then water vapor way above that, at 36-72%.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green…
Re: Seaweed in Cow Feed Reduces Methane Emissions Almost Entirely
#188It will be interesting to see how this plays out, because right now the West coast from San Francisco North to at least Fort Bragg, has been suffering a kelp die off of great proportions. No one is quite sure whats going on, but apparently due to climate change, or at least warmer ocean water from further South that we've had for the last 5 or more years, has caused the kelp to die off at a rapid rate, to the point o…
Not sure about the situation on the West Coast, but based on a recent 60 Minutes episode there seems to be a burgeoning commercial kelp farming market on the East Coast. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/seaweed-farming-and-its-surpris...
The episode even talked about how the increase acidification is really good for growing kelp.
Re: Seaweed in Cow Feed Reduces Methane Emissions Almost Entirely
#189Perhaps they should study the nutritional impacts of the resulting beef before they get too far with this. Grass fed beef is much tastier and much more nutritious than feed lot fed beef. Does feeding the seaweed reduce the need for using antibiotics required when feeding corn to cattle? That would be a real win.
In what sense is grass fed beef more nutritious? It's a rather nebulous term, hence my question.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/heart-disease...
In a feed lot, cattle are fed a diet that practically requires antibiotics to keep them alive long enough to slaughter.
Re: Seaweed in Cow Feed Reduces Methane Emissions Almost Entirely
#190Earlier quoted context omitted.
Random Gaurdian story puts methane : "Methane accounted for about 16% of global greenhouse gas emissions in 2015, according to the IPCC." ( https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/sep/29/methane-... ) Wikipedia puts (with some question about the citation) methan at 4-9% of total greenhouse effect contribution, and CO2 at 9-26%. (And then water vapor way above that, at 36-72%.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green…
How are we producing water vapor more than say clouds?