There are more alternatives to Google & Mapbox that mostly use OpenStreetMap as a backing data source: https://openmaptiles.org (only map tiles) https://stadiamaps.com (map tiles, static maps & routing) https://www.thunderforest.com (only maps) https://geocoder.opencagedata.com (only geocoding) https://geocode.earth (only geocoding) A laundry listing: https://switch2osm.org/providers/ Tile providers are very thankful…
How Mapbox Is Winning Over Developers to Challenge Google's Mapping Dominance
51–60 of 114 posts
Re: How Mapbox Is Winning Over Developers to Challenge Google's Mapping Dominance
#52> Widespread adoption has other benefits. Mapbox doesn't need to send out pricey cars or satellites in space to map the world. "Map data is not like food, air, water that's just around. It takes active work to make it," says Young Hahn, Mapbox's CTO. Whenever someone opens a Mapbox map, that person's phone or computer sends three pieces of anonymous data back to the company: longitude, latitude and a time stamp. Thes…
The Mapbox map is tracking its users. Based on that location data they can derive unmapped roads, turning restrictions, traffic jams (and time-of-day congestion), construction. And feeding other machine learning system to improve the data set. In a recent press release they talk about deployed sensors, no longer users. Google Maps knows when rush hour at your local gym is, Mapbox wants the same. It's a big selling po…
Re: How Mapbox Is Winning Over Developers to Challenge Google's Mapping Dominance
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
It depends on your hobby project. Google's free tier gives unlimited map views, commercial or not. (Edit: On native apps.) Mapbox's free tier only gives 50k map views, and only for non-commercial apps. If you're a paid app, you also have to pay $499 per month on top of your usage.
Mapbox also gives unlimited map views for native mobile apps. Pricing is instead based on monthly active users (50k free).
I like what they're doing, and wanted to use them for a web app with restricted access, but certainly not going to pay $499pcm for a side project.
Re: How Mapbox Is Winning Over Developers to Challenge Google's Mapping Dominance
#54Re: How Mapbox Is Winning Over Developers to Challenge Google's Mapping Dominance
#55How does mapbox compare to carto.com ?
I consider Carto and Mapbox to be tangential services in many respects.
Re: How Mapbox Is Winning Over Developers to Challenge Google's Mapping Dominance
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because it's in Forbes?
forbes.com/sites might as well be wordpress.com, it's just some blog. Pretty amazing how little such a big brand is actually worth.
But in general, definitely look closely at the forbes.com/sites articles.
Re: How Mapbox Is Winning Over Developers to Challenge Google's Mapping Dominance
#57Last I checked, MapBox's WebGL based vector tile renderer was a cut above the rest. For simple mapping, Google's stuff may cut it, but MapBox has the ability to draw complex vector polygons over a wide area that render/zoom/scroll fast and provide a nice experience. This is pretty important if you want to provide fine grained analysis of geographic areas. If you wanted this on GMaps, you were stuck rendering all your…
Mapzen, a now sadly defunct mapping startup, also had an awesome (if I say so myself - I used to work there, but not on that team) vector tile renderer for browser and mobile. Check it out at https://github.com/tangrams Also, there was a great interactive style editor ( https://github.com/tangrams/tangram-play ), although it seems the demo site is broken now :-(
Re: How Mapbox Is Winning Over Developers to Challenge Google's Mapping Dominance
#58Re: How Mapbox Is Winning Over Developers to Challenge Google's Mapping Dominance
#59I have no evidence to support it, but this article feels like bought and paid for PR.