How Mapbox Is Winning Over Developers to Challenge Google's Mapping Dominance
21–30 of 114 posts
Re: How Mapbox Is Winning Over Developers to Challenge Google's Mapping Dominance
#22Re: How Mapbox Is Winning Over Developers to Challenge Google's Mapping Dominance
#23Curious quote. A flywheel stores energy. What does that have to do with a system learning as it's used? Also curious phrasing. "That flywheel"? Which flywheel?
Re: How Mapbox Is Winning Over Developers to Challenge Google's Mapping Dominance
#24Last I checked, MapBox's WebGL based vector tile renderer was a cut above the rest. For simple mapping, Google's stuff may cut it, but MapBox has the ability to draw complex vector polygons over a wide area that render/zoom/scroll fast and provide a nice experience. This is pretty important if you want to provide fine grained analysis of geographic areas. If you wanted this on GMaps, you were stuck rendering all your…
Also, there was a great interactive style editor (https://github.com/tangrams/tangram-play), although it seems the demo site is broken now :-(
Re: How Mapbox Is Winning Over Developers to Challenge Google's Mapping Dominance
#25Re: How Mapbox Is Winning Over Developers to Challenge Google's Mapping Dominance
#26I have no evidence to support it, but this article feels like bought and paid for PR.
All media is bought and paid for PR. The only question is who's paying for it and why. That's not necessarily a bad thing, either. It's just the way it is.
Re: How Mapbox Is Winning Over Developers to Challenge Google's Mapping Dominance
#27Re: How Mapbox Is Winning Over Developers to Challenge Google's Mapping Dominance
#28What are the stumbling blocks to self-hosting Mapbox?
Re: How Mapbox Is Winning Over Developers to Challenge Google's Mapping Dominance
#29Re: How Mapbox Is Winning Over Developers to Challenge Google's Mapping Dominance
#30Mapbox feels really good. API, docs and rendering performance all of this is really good. Although it's not an obvious choice if you are starting fresh. I personally find the pricing impossible to digest. Probably sounds reasonable for well-founded startups from developed countries. If your doing a bootstrapped product and can't pay 500$ it's not for you.
Google Maps. the v3 it's here for a while. The API feels good, but not great, Stack Overflow is your documentation. Rendering performance is bad, rendering performance with (many) markers without some hacks is terrible, rendering performance on mobile is even worse. I'm trying to figure out what new the pricing means for me.
Leaflet and OpenStreetMap look like a better choice for all hobby projects and small product from now on.