Did anyone else notice how corporations like Twitter and Facebook quietly tried to kill RSS in the past 10 years? RSS is a wonderful technology with embodies the spirit of the Internet. Facebook and Twitter are, by comparison, cancer. I often recommend WordPress to folks as an alternative for blogging, because it is free and has RSS functional out of the box.
I'm a big fan of Feedbin, because it lets you subscribe to any Twitter user's profile as a normal feed and browse it too. It means I can subscribe to 10 or so people I really don't want to miss and get their updates exactly like I would a normal feed. https://feedbin.com/
Now Is the Perfect Time for an RSS Renaissance
301–310 of 358 posts
Re: Now Is the Perfect Time for an RSS Renaissance
#302"People" keep rattling on about how RSS needs to be revived. Do these people live in some sort of alternative reality where: - The guardian - BBC - Reuters - Ars Technica - LWN - Hacker News and a fuck ton others don't have an RSS feed? Or some sort or reality where Flym (or the myriads of RSS apps) don't exist? Because I sure as hell don't.
Main reason I don't exclusively use RSS (like I used to) is tons and tons of websites just provide a couple lines in the RSS feed and not the entire article. Super annoying.
Re: Now Is the Perfect Time for an RSS Renaissance
#303Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or there was a big trend where they only links were to an itunes page which a) requires itunes to be installed because b) there is no direct link for the rss feed. I had to write a scraper to find the underlying rss feed for itunes only podcasts.
Do the iTunes only podcast feeds need auth to access? Would you be willing to open source this?
https://superuser.com/questions/78415/get-rss-feed-from-itun...
Maybe Apple will change/throttle the endpoint in the future but for now it's not authenticated.
Re: Now Is the Perfect Time for an RSS Renaissance
#304"People" keep rattling on about how RSS needs to be revived. Do these people live in some sort of alternative reality where: - The guardian - BBC - Reuters - Ars Technica - LWN - Hacker News and a fuck ton others don't have an RSS feed? Or some sort or reality where Flym (or the myriads of RSS apps) don't exist? Because I sure as hell don't.
RSS is as alive as www.myspace.com is. Before you point out how RSS powers all kinds of other invisible stuff that most people aren't aware of, that's not what this article is talking about, nor is it what people mean when they say RSS is dead. If you truly believe that RSS has as much influence over consumers in 2018 as a decade or so ago, you probably do live in an alternate reality.
Re: Now Is the Perfect Time for an RSS Renaissance
#305"People" keep rattling on about how RSS needs to be revived. Do these people live in some sort of alternative reality where: - The guardian - BBC - Reuters - Ars Technica - LWN - Hacker News and a fuck ton others don't have an RSS feed? Or some sort or reality where Flym (or the myriads of RSS apps) don't exist? Because I sure as hell don't.
Main reason I don't exclusively use RSS (like I used to) is tons and tons of websites just provide a couple lines in the RSS feed and not the entire article. Super annoying.
Re: Now Is the Perfect Time for an RSS Renaissance
#306Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ars technica provides full rss - to paying readers. The price is reasonable. It's a win-win: they probably earn more on each paying customer than on 10 or 20 adblocking users like us. Paying customers get full uncrippled RSS, no ads and no tracking (I think it's tiered though so you might have to pay slightly more to get all these three).
I would say that's not RSS winning, but more like Ars Technica adding many "premium features" as a bundle to justify the subscription fee. It's like NYTimes providing crossword puzzle for free to subscribed users. You wouldn't call that "It's the perfect time for a crossword puzzle renaissance", would you?
Personally I think this is fine. If paying for their content encouages them to maintain a quality RSS feed and not track you that seems like a reasonable exchange.
Re: Now Is the Perfect Time for an RSS Renaissance
#307"People" keep rattling on about how RSS needs to be revived. Do these people live in some sort of alternative reality where: - The guardian - BBC - Reuters - Ars Technica - LWN - Hacker News and a fuck ton others don't have an RSS feed? Or some sort or reality where Flym (or the myriads of RSS apps) don't exist? Because I sure as hell don't.
Yes, RSS still exists. So does Myspace.
Re: Now Is the Perfect Time for an RSS Renaissance
#308Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sorry, no. RSS and Atom already does the job. https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/standards.png
Why didn't you link to the comic to allow Munroe to gain views/advertisement revenue/etc.?
Re: Now Is the Perfect Time for an RSS Renaissance
#309Earlier quoted context omitted.
Believe it or not, some people make high-quality content on the internet with the expectation of compensation. The current state of advertising is ethically and technically questionable in many ways. But the idea of advertising as a revenue model is not.
Ethical advertising is pretty much a unicorn. I don't deny that it's possible but I would struggle to find even a single example of it in the wild.
Re: Now Is the Perfect Time for an RSS Renaissance
#310Earlier quoted context omitted.
In regards to your full text request. The publisher has the option what to syndicate, truncated or full. What you are asking them to do is have a crawler go to the site and pull the full text whenever they feel they are being served truncated. Not only does that go against the nature of RSS, but would be costly for them. What app do you pay for that does this? Is it even using RSS?
Quite a few apps provide this. One is called Newsify. I don’t know that it goes against the nature of RSS. I kind of feel that providing only a title of the article and a link goes against the spirit. But nature and spirit are different.