You mean they follow what many people consider best practices? https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/1592... https://stackoverflow.com/questions/820466/never-delete-entr... https://serverfault.com/questions/31455/should-i-ever-delete... https://www.infoq.com/news/2009/09/Do-Not-Delete-Data http://udidahan.com/2009/09/01/dont-delete-just-dont/ https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2549839/are-soft-dele…
"best practices" is for developers. For the average Joe and Janet out there, "deleting" something is synonymous to "remove from the internet for eternity"
Facebook Secretly Saved Videos Users Deleted
291–300 of 405 posts
Re: Facebook Secretly Saved Videos Users Deleted
#292Earlier quoted context omitted.
You accept that when you join.
Users didn't accept anything just because they checked a checkbox next to a link to an ever-changing jumble of legalese to get past a screen. This isn't agreement, it's manufactured consent.
Re: Facebook Secretly Saved Videos Users Deleted
#293This reminds me of the long conversations that I used to have with family members and friends several years ago. With their continuous requests to create my own Facebook profile so I can keep in contact with them and with their activities as well as to share my whereabouts. I always used the same argument to reject these suggestions — "I don't want Facebook to have too much data about me, more than the data that you…
Unfortunately there will be no prizes for having been right all along. Even now, as facebook is burning, statements of how one has quit or will be quitting facebook get swept into the pile of incendiary indignation, with encouragement from all sides. But never having used facebook, even at significant personal effort as you indicate, one is relegated from "elitist" before to "smug" now. One day in the future a recrui…
Except not having your racy pictures in Facebook's media archive.
Re: Facebook Secretly Saved Videos Users Deleted
#294You mean they follow what many people consider best practices? https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/1592... https://stackoverflow.com/questions/820466/never-delete-entr... https://serverfault.com/questions/31455/should-i-ever-delete... https://www.infoq.com/news/2009/09/Do-Not-Delete-Data http://udidahan.com/2009/09/01/dont-delete-just-dont/ https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2549839/are-soft-dele…
Disclaimer: I deleted my Facebook account a couple years ago and never looked back. That said, Facebook is who is just getting collectively stabbed with the pitchfork right now. Engineering best practices are one thing. My right to privacy is another. As an engineer I care about efficiency. As a human I care about privacy. My rights win over any technocratic babble. Sorry if I am being harsh. I am, of course not surp…
Re: Facebook Secretly Saved Videos Users Deleted
#295Earlier quoted context omitted.
Facebook's terms of services agreement that you must consent to in order to open or maintain your account. These are the rules not because Facebook says so, but because you say so when you agree to their terms.
Let's be clear here: I'm not the Facebook user in question. I've never uploaded a video to Facebook and never will. Users didn't sign or agree to anything just because they checked a checkbox next to a link to an ever-changing jumble of legalese to get past a screen. This isn't agreement, it's manufactured consent.
What is the difference? I am thinking if a person really actually cared they would have read the legal agreement before checking the checkbox in question and possibly consulted an attorney of their own. I am thinking most users absolutely do not care and agree out-right and immediately to all claims presented by Facebook. How is that not still agreement?
Re: Facebook Secretly Saved Videos Users Deleted
#296On top of that, you know what else do they measure? SENTIMENT. So until kicking Facebook generates more revenue - the articles will paint Facebook as a world's main evil. But the day sentiment changes you will see all the articles about Facebook following best practices.
And in the end? Some EU commission will be created and make a law which oblige to "show cookie usage disclaimer", because of which 90% of sites welcome you with ugly popup and ruin the experience providing 0% advantage in managing your privacy...
Re: Facebook Secretly Saved Videos Users Deleted
#297The funniest part of it: All the media hype around the topic is generated... BY DATA collected by NYT/Bloomberg/Techcrunch/you name it. Those articles generate additional views and they just continue to ride this wave. And all those publications share this data with 3rd parties (ad networks, analytics providers, cpa networks) On top of that, you know what else do they measure? SENTIMENT. So until kicking Facebook gen…
So what you're saying is that sites like nymag will only run stories that are profitable?
Re: Facebook Secretly Saved Videos Users Deleted
#298Earlier quoted context omitted.
Fucking stupid policy - so they have 90 days to off load your shit to Utah/gov-cloud before they “delete” your data? Who can possibly believe this BS. Imagine you wanted to delete data of your own Sustem - but when you hit rm it takes 90 days to execute - this sentiment PISSES me off. When I say “delete me from your service now” I have a reasonable expectation that you will delete it. C’mon
It's interesting that you think they need those 90 days to off load your data. As if they hadn't done so before your deletion. By the way, rm does work like that. The file will just be marked as deleted (by removing its entry from the filesystem index), but will remain on your disk for some time afterwards, from some minutes to months. If you want to ensure deletion, you should be using shred.
Utter horse crap
Re: Facebook Secretly Saved Videos Users Deleted
#299This reminds me of the long conversations that I used to have with family members and friends several years ago. With their continuous requests to create my own Facebook profile so I can keep in contact with them and with their activities as well as to share my whereabouts. I always used the same argument to reject these suggestions — "I don't want Facebook to have too much data about me, more than the data that you…
Unfortunately there will be no prizes for having been right all along. Even now, as facebook is burning, statements of how one has quit or will be quitting facebook get swept into the pile of incendiary indignation, with encouragement from all sides. But never having used facebook, even at significant personal effort as you indicate, one is relegated from "elitist" before to "smug" now. One day in the future a recrui…
Re: Facebook Secretly Saved Videos Users Deleted
#300The funniest part of it: All the media hype around the topic is generated... BY DATA collected by NYT/Bloomberg/Techcrunch/you name it. Those articles generate additional views and they just continue to ride this wave. And all those publications share this data with 3rd parties (ad networks, analytics providers, cpa networks) On top of that, you know what else do they measure? SENTIMENT. So until kicking Facebook gen…
> On top of that, you know what else do they measure? SENTIMENT. So until kicking Facebook generates more revenue - the articles will paint Facebook as a world's main evil. But the day sentiment changes you will see all the articles about Facebook following best practices. So what you're saying is that sites like nymag will only run stories that are profitable?
Article can't go through editor -> article is not published