I went a few years without Google Analytics, and I was proud of the fact that my weblog had no tracking software. I kept thinking I would write a script to track the audience myself. But I was busy and never got around to it. So in the autumn I decided, okay, I'll use Google Analytics for a few months, till I can write my own code.
I'd written my own system for tracking my weblog, back in the era of 2005-2009, before I used WordPress (back when I only used my own code for websites).
Looking at the Google Analytics results nowadays is heartbreaking for someone like me, who remembers the independent blogosphere of 12 years ago. Because it is gone. Utterly gone.
Back then my traffic tended to come from dozens of independent bloggers who noticed when I occasionally said something smart. The blogosphere was a world of individual voices. There were big group blogs, such as Crooked Timber, but even those consisted of individuals and it was easy to figure out who had admired something I wrote. It was a world where you had some sense of who was reading you, and what they thought about you, and they could see when you read them in return.
That world died in the era 2006-2010 as Twitter and Facebook gained influence.
Nowadays, Google Analytics shows I get traffic from sites that aggregate audiences. Overwhelmingly, that's Facebook and Twitter. The traffic is very sporadic, full of big spikes of anonymous readers. A few times a year I'll write something that gets on the front page of Hacker News, and then I'll get from Hacker News anywhere from 4,000 to 40,000 visits over two or three days. Which is great, but also sporadic.
What I miss is the ability to follow those who are reading me, and more so, their awareness, in response, that I am reading them in return. The dynamic of "You read me so I read you and you see that I read you" is alive and well on specific sites, such as Twitter, but I miss it being part of the general Internet experience. I do realize I can use something like https://github.com/RSS-Bridge/rss-bridge to treat social media as a series of RSS feeds, and I am planning on doing that, but that still misses the element of them seeing that I am reading them.
I've been thinking about some way to try to balance people's preference for walled-gardens with this kind of open back and forth conversation. I might work on this more seriously later in the year.
If anyone is interested in a bit of history, way back in 2006 I wrote what was widely considered the most definitive summary of the fighting that had taken place among those interested in developing RSS. All of this was made irrelevant by the rise of Twitter, but in 2006, this still seemed like a very important topic for the Web industry:
"RSS has been damaged by in-fighting among those who advocate for it"
http://www.smashcompany.com/technology/rss-has-been-damaged-...