Live data from Hacker News

Coinbase Index Fund

blog.coinbase.com

241–250 of 346 posts

Re: Coinbase Index Fund

#241

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I suggest those interested in Crypto Index Traded Funds to look into Crypto20. This fund provides a way to track the performance of the crypto markets as a whole by holding a single crypto asset. "Crypto20 is a tokenized, closed-end index fund (CEF) which passively tracks the top twenty cryptocurrency assets by market capitalisation. All profits are reinvested into the fund." Here is the link to the whitepaper for th…

One thing I really don't like about Crypto20 is this: "The liquidation option offers a price floor protection – this ensures the price never drops below that of the underlying assets because of market manipulation. Prices are, however, free to increase as speculative value is created by the high demand for a low-cost, diversified and automated cryptocurrency portfolio that can be held as a single token" A unit of Cry…

Why don’t you like that it trades at a premium? It is a close-ended fund.

Re: Coinbase Index Fund

#242

This is a terrible deal. A 2% annual fee is a hedge-fund-esque fee. For 2% I'd expect an actively managed fund that gets in on ICO presales, carefully vets teams/technologies behind new coins and gets in early, has a strategy for hedging risk, etc. etc. Instead you get a passively managed fund with FOUR assets that are all tightly correlated with each other (they all crash at the same time), that is only rebalanced o…

Just to elaborate:

On a yearly basis the only two coins among the top coins that correlate less with the coins listed in the index are Ripple and Stellar.

Source:

http://cryptoport.net/blog/diversification-i.html (my blog, just scroll down to the correlation matrices)

EDIT: "don't correlate closely" -> "correlate less"

Re: Coinbase Index Fund

#243

This is a terrible deal. A 2% annual fee is a hedge-fund-esque fee. For 2% I'd expect an actively managed fund that gets in on ICO presales, carefully vets teams/technologies behind new coins and gets in early, has a strategy for hedging risk, etc. etc. Instead you get a passively managed fund with FOUR assets that are all tightly correlated with each other (they all crash at the same time), that is only rebalanced o…

Just to elaborate: On a yearly basis the only two coins among the top coins that correlate less with the coins listed in the index are Ripple and Stellar. Source: http://cryptoport.net/blog/diversification-i.html (my blog, just scroll down to the correlation matrices) EDIT: "don't correlate closely" -> "correlate less"

They are still very correlated with the other top crypto coins. In the most recent crash Stellar and Ripple plunged just the same.

Re: Coinbase Index Fund

#245

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This whole regulation is unneeded. You can bring your money to a casino and put it all on zero. Or buy a thousand lottery tickets. But investing in risky businesses needs to be walled off to the wealthy. What we really need is the real consequences for fraud / false financial claims.

At the casino your risks are known, and well-defined. In blackjack with basic strategy your expected value is, what, 49%? Craps, it's similar. Just look it up. Nobody at the table playing, or even running the show, can manipulate the outcome except by changing the parameters of the game as posted in the (I assume) regulated odds boards. Investing in an unregulated market is absolutely nothing like that. Your outcome…

> In blackjack with basic strategy your expected value is, what, 49%?

Assuming you number is correct, that's after just one game. So you're expected to lose 2% each game (51-49). So if you play 20 games, you lose 33.3% (1-0.98^20).

And you can't win against the casino in the long run. With cryptocurrency investments you can. In fact, if you choose a random time to invest, in, say, Bitcoin, you will win most of the time.

Re: Coinbase Index Fund

#246

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just to elaborate: On a yearly basis the only two coins among the top coins that correlate less with the coins listed in the index are Ripple and Stellar. Source: http://cryptoport.net/blog/diversification-i.html (my blog, just scroll down to the correlation matrices) EDIT: "don't correlate closely" -> "correlate less"

They are still very correlated with the other top crypto coins. In the most recent crash Stellar and Ripple plunged just the same.

Fixed it, thanks.

Re: Coinbase Index Fund

#247

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This whole regulation is unneeded. You can bring your money to a casino and put it all on zero. Or buy a thousand lottery tickets. But investing in risky businesses needs to be walled off to the wealthy. What we really need is the real consequences for fraud / false financial claims.

Casinos (and lotteries) are subject to heavy regulation, including oversight on the odds of the games they offer. The problem with back-end enforcement (and those laws do exist) is that it doesn't remove the incentive to try issuing a scam-ish security and hope you will evade prosecution, and the damage done can take years to unwind, if it's even possible at all. This is why there are regulations on public offerings…

Really?

1) So what lottery odds are not allowed?

2) Can you name a single lottery with odds in your favor?

Cause with cryptocurrencies, so far, the investors have made money on average.

Re: Coinbase Index Fund

#248

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This whole regulation is unneeded. You can bring your money to a casino and put it all on zero. Or buy a thousand lottery tickets. But investing in risky businesses needs to be walled off to the wealthy. What we really need is the real consequences for fraud / false financial claims.

You wildly overestimate how good most people are at evaluating risks. This isn't a couple hundred bucks over a weekend in vegas we're talking about, it's peoples' life savings or retirement accounts or childrens' college funds. If given the opportunity to invest in something with potentially extreme returns and poorly represented risks, many people will take it either because they don't understand the risk involved o…

> This isn't a couple hundred bucks over a weekend in vegas we're talking about, it's peoples' life savings or retirement accounts or childrens' college funds.

You think people had never lost their life savings in casinos or lotteries?

I can walk into a casino and bet $5K on every roulette roll. I personally know people who lost $30-40K in Atlantic City casinos.

Re: Coinbase Index Fund

#249

I have attempted to duplicate this index fund manually by purchasing the top 25 cryptocurrencies (market-cap weighted) over the past year or so. I'll say that it was hardly worth the enormous work involved, and these index funds cannot come soon enough to non-accredited investors. In some cases it's not possible to do perfectly alone: NEO has a minimum unit of 1 coin, and so if you wanted it to not be overweighted, y…

I had the same problems with re-balancing my own portfolio and ended up creating a trading bot that automatically diversifies my investment portfolio across the top 20 coins by market cap (10% capped). It is heavily inspired by the crypto20 whitepaper. For anyone that is interested, you can find the project here: www.hodlbot.io I'm about 1-2 weeks from the MVP launch. Only the top 20 coins by market cap fund will be…

Sounds awesome. Can't wait for weeks, have signed up.

One request: Could you lower the monthly fee for people like me who are from India like in the range of $1 to $5 per month. $15 is a large figure for Indian common citizens.

Re: Coinbase Index Fund

#250
post #46

There are many people ("traditional" hedge fund managers) outside of the crypto world that want "exposure" without having to figure out which ones to pick. This seems like a perfect product for them. But from what I understand.. If $100 in invested into the index fund, $67 of bitcoin is bought, $27 of Ethereum, $7 of Bitcoin Cash, and $4 of Litecoin. Bitcoin - 62% Ethereum - 27% Bitcoin Cash - 7% Litecoin - 4% Doesn'…

Yes, by design! The most traditional way of deciding index weights is by market capitalization: if the world has thus far allocated more to Bitcoin than Ethereum, the index will too. Besides concurring with past "wisdom", this method minimizes management overhead. If Ethereum doubles in price tomorrow, so that by market capitalization it should have similar weight to Bitcoin, the index will already be "in position" b…

I hadn't considered this, why do you ever need to rebalance then?
Post reply on HN