Nanopore MinION – $1k solid-state DNA sequencers
41–50 of 111 posts
Re: Nanopore MinION – $1k solid-state DNA sequencers
#42Re: Nanopore MinION – $1k solid-state DNA sequencers
#43Can we ever imagine dna sequencing been done like a remoter sensor? E.g. automated sampling for e(environmental) dna,in-situ sequencing (single and multi species targeting), results transmitted back wirelessly. A biodiversity IoT system?
All the technology required already exists. You'd just need a compelling enough application.
Pshhh, easy: Gattaca
kidding
Re: Nanopore MinION – $1k solid-state DNA sequencers
#44Re: Nanopore MinION – $1k solid-state DNA sequencers
#45Can we ever imagine dna sequencing been done like a remoter sensor? E.g. automated sampling for e(environmental) dna,in-situ sequencing (single and multi species targeting), results transmitted back wirelessly. A biodiversity IoT system?
All the technology required already exists. You'd just need a compelling enough application.
Re: Nanopore MinION – $1k solid-state DNA sequencers
#46There was a cool visualization from data produced on nanopore on /r/dataisbeautiful recently [1]. It really shows the strengths of the device - ~50kb region with 3kb imperfect repeats. This would be impossible to align properly with [1] https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/7rpdr0/wev...
The read lengths might be long, but the error rate is a couple of orders of magnitude higher. I can’t see a market large enough for highly error’d log reads to support their valuation.
Re: Nanopore MinION – $1k solid-state DNA sequencers
#47I remember looking into this device before, but as I recall it was intended for small bacterial genomes. A quick Google turns up that a paper using the device to sequence a human genome has only just been published [0] hence the update to the website. I'm not at all familiar with the technology, but doesn't the fact that experts have only just now been able to sequence human DNA mean it would be pretty unlikely the d…
A few years ago, the sequencing field was really excited for this platform as an alternative/competitor to Illumina. Unfortunately, the MinION platform has never been able to generate enough high-quality data for most eukaryotic sequencing use cases. The MinION still has it's niche... long read sequencing can resolve problematic regions of the genome, and the minION is the only option for rapid sequencing in the fiel…
That's what Illumina will tell you. But that really depends what you mean by "a genome" and what you intend to use it for. Getting anywhere near the quality of the Human Genome Project is not possible.
Re: Nanopore MinION – $1k solid-state DNA sequencers
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
$1,000 for the starter pack - what kind of use can you get out of that, and how much are the ongoing costs for the flowcells and anything else that needs to be replenished? Are you using it for fun? professionally? academically?
Flow cells are 1000$ each (unless you buy a lot of them), the sequencer is basically a USB dongle with a uC in it and all the important stuff is in the flow cell. Flow cells are basically disposable (but you mail them back). You get one-ish use out of a flow cell though they can be "washed" and realoaded. Reagent kits run a few hundred dollars depending on what your doing and you get several uses out of them. IIRC it…
Re: Nanopore MinION – $1k solid-state DNA sequencers
#49Can we ever imagine dna sequencing been done like a remoter sensor? E.g. automated sampling for e(environmental) dna,in-situ sequencing (single and multi species targeting), results transmitted back wirelessly. A biodiversity IoT system?
Re: Nanopore MinION – $1k solid-state DNA sequencers
#50(You don't need a complete sequence for that, just enough unique markers to ID somebody.)
Goodbye "papers, please", hello "cheek swab, please".