Live data from Hacker News

Tech workers worry about age discrimination at age 40: Study

theladders.com

171–180 of 312 posts

Re: Tech workers worry about age discrimination at age 40: Study

#171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is VERY good analysis, everything else is padding to validate why 40 year old are not good fits. It is puzzling that most business owners prefer to save their imagined superior position than to get the job done. Sure I have seen ton of problems (and solved most of them) in 25+ years of carrier and I can be of great help in any startup. My caring for the company and input should be welcomed, not seen as threat. I…

Higher-ups and execs don't care if you're mediocre and barely get the job done as long as you kiss their ass and take their low pay to make them look good and get their bonuses.

I understand that to some degree, there always was and will be crappy companies. What I don't get is that great majority (say 95%) of companies I encountered in last ten years were all about 'earning on salaries'.

In the entire hierarchy of the company there has to be somebody that recognizes quality and experience over job barely done (or not at all).

I see companies that prefer gullible as make pretend role playing, there is no money and business is barely moving along but hey at least I am owning something.

Just don't get it I suppose. I did run successful company then sold it at its peak, but it was never about role playing while I was at the top.

Re: Tech workers worry about age discrimination at age 40: Study

#172
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On behalf of all old people: Fuck that, and fuck the idea that cognitive performance alone should determine whether someone in our industry can eat. Because as much as we love to tout that every programmer is living with a house and a mortgage and a happy family, I happen to know for a fact that some are struggling to eat. Eh. Not exactly an objective viewpoint, I know. But to maybe drain away some of the energy I ju…

> I've known some amazingly productive old people. I learned from one of the best in the gamedev industry. He was my mentor, and basically a mini carmack. When I hear statements like this, I cannot fathom how people believe this myth that old people are inherently less able to kick your ass at programming. I'm increasingly old (and hope to live to be really old) but we should try to keep our personal self interests o…

> We need a strong social net that works for everyone, not equal opportunity at work for old folks

Why set these two things at odds?

It’s hard to imagine a better way to avoid having large numbers of destitute old people to worry about than finding a way to enable them to take care of themeselves. That is, providing opportunities for employment. If that makes you uncomfortable, consider the alternatives before you reject it... e.g., higher taxes — perhaps much higher, depending on demographic trends — to pay for warehousing indigent old people Naturally, budget pressures will make it debatable whether these warehouses are actually humane, so you’ll have that to deal with as well. (You may think twice about exactly how hard your standard are once you realize you’ll be entering the same system.)

By the way, if you want to be scientific you won’t want to draw strong conclusions about employing old people from the fact that fluid intelligence begins to decline fairly early in adulthood. First, fluid intelligence is just one component of general intelligence in that model. The other component increases or is basically flat up to retirement age. Second, these measures of intelligence are not that great for predicting job performance in general much less for the small overall decline associated with aging. Here’s some reading if you’re inclined to dig into that a bit [1]. Also, keep in mind an employer isn’t choosing from a random selection of people, where the weak effects of age-related IQ differences might nudge you between two otherwise equivalent prospective hires. They are choosing between a group of carefully selected, screened, interviewed, tested candidates with a career of experience (however long that is for each individual). To make age itself a significant factor in a hiring decision is to believe you are profoundly incompetent at hiring since you must believe your other information gathering techniques are pretty much worthless.

[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4557354/

Re: Tech workers worry about age discrimination at age 40: Study

#173
post #3

> "...Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg reportedly said that young people are more intelligent while speaking to a group of entrepreneurs " I would be fascinated to hear if his opinion changes once he is 40+ ...

His opinion already changed when he hit 30. I can't find the article but a few years ago he stated something like he wishes he could take that quote back and doesn't believe in it anymore.

Re: Tech workers worry about age discrimination at age 40: Study

#175
post #104
post #76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Some of those points are actually age discriminatory. For example, why assume that an older person should earn more than a younger person? Instead, it's better to think about paying people in proportion to the value that they provide to the company. I understand that many startups simply do not have the cash required to pay a high base salary. But, that's what equity compensation is for.

Nobody is assuming you should pay an older person more because they are older, but because they are more experienced. Paying someone with 30 years experience more than someone fresh out of school isn't age discrimination. Find me a fresh out of school 20 year old with 30 years experience and I'll pay them more too.

Paying someone with 30 years experience more than someone fresh out of school isn't age discrimination.

Just because someone has worked 30 years, doesn't mean they have 30 years of experience. They may have 5 years of experience 6 times or even worse stopped learning anything new 15 years ago.

I'm in my mid 40s and I've hired developers who are older than I am and had 10+ years of C# but have never done a unit test, didn't understand the concepts of continuous integration/continuous deployment, didn't know Linq (introduced in 2008), Web API (introduced in 2011), and didn't even know WCF.

I needed developers and thought with their experience with different technologies they would be able to adapt. I was hiring based on Joel's "smart and gets stuff done".

Was I wrong. Older developers who haven't kept up with the trends for the last decade and haven't kept up with the changes in technology are worse than young developers who don't know.

As far as the pay ceiling, yes I've reached a ceiling as a developer. But not as an architect who both keeps up the latest shiney frameworks and has a deep understanding of the fundamentals.

Re: Tech workers worry about age discrimination at age 40: Study

#176

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was recently rejected by a big tech company for not knowing Java 8. I code in scala in my day job and haven't kept up with changes in java. My coding exercise language options were nodejs,java, python, I submitted solution java 7. Interviewer said to my face( well..on the phone) that they won't be "moving forward" because I don't keep up with changes in technology and they are a 'fast moving' tech environment.

Sounds like you dodged a bullet.

There are a lot of those kinds of bullets to dodge. That's kind of the point behind the concern over age discrimination. These "bullets" are more or less cover for age discrimination.

Re: Tech workers worry about age discrimination at age 40: Study

#177
post #136

I see all these articles about the average employee age at startups being 20-30, and how older developers face discrimination. Now this is 100% anecdotal, but I know a few 45+ year old developers and most of them are long-time corporate employees and are not really interested in the whole startup / bloggosphere / tech hype world. They have good stable jobs (think Perl, .NET, Java), and are mainly focused on their fam…

I can't be sure yet, but I'm starting to be concerned. I turned 40 recently. My current job search has lasted about 5x longer than any previous job search. I've been turned down for nonsensical reasons, such as not having enough experience in a specific language that I have a lot of experience in. (That was an assertion by the interviewer, not the result of technical questioning.) I've been interviewed several times…

I've recently been thrown into the position of interviewing many candidates for both more senior roles than I have, and job functions I know nothing about. So I'm totally guilty of this, sorry.

We had a candidate a while ago with lots of experience in many different stacks, but none in the ones we use. I suggested to the hiring manager that ageism might be a factor here, as he clearly could learn new stacks based on his past experience, so it was reasonable to expect he could learn ours and not need as much specific experience up front. We didn't hire him, and I feel that was a bad decision when I look back. We recently started hiring grey haired men again, but only after it was needed by the sales team.

Re: Tech workers worry about age discrimination at age 40: Study

#178

I suspect there are a couple of reasons - especially in the newer/startup space: * Salary. Older employees are more experienced, but, just as importantly, they've already job-hopped a bit, so their base is a lot higher. And they've probably a lot more personal financial responsibilities. All told, they're unlikely to go for the same salary as a new grad. * Interview process. Anecdotal experience, but, the interview p…

All of those reasons sound reasonable, and if I were trying to come up with reasons in the abstract I'd probably come up with a list like that.

But as a programmer in his 50s, when I have personally encountered age discrimination, it's been instant. It wasn't just a thumb on the scale or issues with disparate impact, it was an obvious and clear reaction the moment I walked in the door. It's always stunning when a very pleasant and productive phone conversation becomes immediately hostile when somebody sees my face.

On the other hand, those moments have relatively been rare, and this industry is currently so competitive that they register as "I dodged that bullet" rather than anything truly harmful, although it's definitely been enough for me to see the words "culture fit" as having the definition "we practice illegal discrimination".

BTW, whenever these articles show up on HN we always seem to assume that "tech worker" means developer, but it really refers to everybody: support, manager, tester, etc. If you're a developer, there's tons of ways to keep your skills strong. But the support person who's been keeping a Sybase instance running for the last 20 years or who maintains some spaghetti netware system doesn't necessarily have any marketable skills. There's a lot of people whose skillset is essentially "I've been here a long time".

Re: Tech workers worry about age discrimination at age 40: Study

#180
post #154

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You don't really have the opportunity to be discriminated against in the same way, so you probably don't really count.

Honestly I would say there's more chances of being discriminated against. Instead of potentially dealing with HR reps or developers behind closed doors people are consuming my content out in the open and judging every video / piece of content.

So... you're not a developer then. You're one of those "full stack rockstars" everyone is talking about not talking about.
Post reply on HN