Earlier quoted context omitted.
They do that with amp.
And people scream about it, even though it’s an unambiguously better experience for the user .
Google will punish sites that use annoying pop-up ads
81–90 of 123 posts
Re: Google will punish sites that use annoying pop-up ads
#82Re: Google will punish sites that use annoying pop-up ads
#83Re: Google will punish sites that use annoying pop-up ads
#84Google is very concerned about ads that visually block text content. But somehow forcing ads in front of videos on YouTube isn't the same exact thing? Both force an ad to be looked at before granting you access to the content you came for. I don't get the distinction.
Re: Google will punish sites that use annoying pop-up ads
#85I work for an e-commerce company. This absolutely brutalized our sales until we made significant changes to our layout. I understand that this instance is seen as a net positive for the end user, but Google should not have the power to force websites to conform to whatever Google decides is the new standard, or become irrelevant. The end user should be deciding what is and isn't worthwhile content, or where to shop,…
Re: Google will punish sites that use annoying pop-up ads
#86It doesn't matter, ad blocking is here to stay and expand, and it's a ticking clock on this nonsense. How many HN users ever see an ad at this point?
If some people get it their way and the web becomes like a binary blob, it might become harder to block ads across the board.
Re: Google will punish sites that use annoying pop-up ads
#87Google is very concerned about ads that visually block text content. But somehow forcing ads in front of videos on YouTube isn't the same exact thing? Both force an ad to be looked at before granting you access to the content you came for. I don't get the distinction.
Not to defend the ad industry, but I don't think these are equivalent. YouTube ads don't block content so much as they delay it, much like inline ads. The equivalent YouTube ad would be if it started playing and didn't pause the video you're trying to watch.
In line ads always confuse the hell out of me especially now that they are getting so camouflaged into the content and content sites have the scroll to next piece of content functionality.
Re: Google will punish sites that use annoying pop-up ads
#88Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am glad to see I am not the only one who gets this. I use IE at work and it is annoying. I have also noticed that Google's Captcha is more annoying than it is on Chrome.
I hope this is not too off-topic, but what features are we missing out on in Chrome that are present in IE?
Re: Google will punish sites that use annoying pop-up ads
#89Google is very concerned about ads that visually block text content. But somehow forcing ads in front of videos on YouTube isn't the same exact thing? Both force an ad to be looked at before granting you access to the content you came for. I don't get the distinction.
Not to defend the ad industry, but I don't think these are equivalent. YouTube ads don't block content so much as they delay it, much like inline ads. The equivalent YouTube ad would be if it started playing and didn't pause the video you're trying to watch.
How will Google punish themselves? Or will Google just punish the publishers who bothered to follow their repeated recommendations to run page level ads on their site?
Re: Google will punish sites that use annoying pop-up ads
#90Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not sure what you mean. Google using Chrome headless for crawling? I'm sure their crawling infrastructure was already more than capable.
How else would they detect popups?