They also own .sucks... of which they were charging $2500 per domain. I don't know why these manipulative TLDs are allowable without considerable regulation. This latest example seems to be more directly extortion, and is likely illegal in many places.
The .feedback scam
121–130 of 171 posts
Re: The .feedback scam
#122Re: The .feedback scam
#123Ick. In a way, it is a sort of corporate version of those mugshot sites. I understand a lot of other scams. (Not condone, but I see the attraction of running it.) This one just seems like a lot of work to put into something that I really don't see the targeted companies choosing to go along with. Seems like borrowing a ton of grief - at the very least, they'll be hearing from a bunch of crabby lawyers.
$600 is less than the cost of lawyer time for a worthwhile response, so they may well collect more than we would like to think...
I'd love to see NewEgg get involved in this. They have a history of going after patent and other legal trolls for the sole purpose of discouraging that type of behaviour. [0]
Sadly, it seems no one has bothered to register newegg.feedback...
[0] https://blog.newegg.com/newegg-vs-patent-trolls-when-we-win-...
Re: The .feedback scam
#124Re: The .feedback scam
#125www.amazon.feedback redirects to amazon.com login page. They paid the extortion?
Re: The .feedback scam
#126Re: The .feedback scam
#127Go to http://feedback.feedback/ and write a sternly-worded review, that'll teach'em.
Re: The .feedback scam
#128Corporate-driven lawsuit for trademark violation?
Re: The .feedback scam
#129They also own .sucks... of which they were charging $2500 per domain. I don't know why these manipulative TLDs are allowable without considerable regulation. This latest example seems to be more directly extortion, and is likely illegal in many places.
Re: The .feedback scam
#130There's precedent for getting a domain based on trademark from someone else.