Live data from Hacker News

The .feedback scam

everythingsysadmin.com

21–30 of 171 posts

Re: The .feedback scam

#21

Could the major browser providers start just blacklisting these kinds of TLD's? Or grey listing with huge warnings?

That's a scary precedent... Sure, similar things have been done to prevent visitors from attacks, but this is at best a platform for expressing criticism and at worst a sleazy shakedown of the companies being criticized (not the visitors), and to my knowledge the anti-phishing/malware warnings haven't been used to merely oppose competing interests or stifle ideas.

Re: The .feedback scam

#22

Wow, the author is not exaggerating when saying it is a scam. Looking at the .feedback page for Stack Overflow, it says at the top, in fairly large letters "We make Stack Overflow, where the world's developers get answers, share knowledge & find jobs they love. Also proud builders of the @stackexchange Q&A network." Then at the absolute bottom, in small, washed out print it says "Disclaimer: This site is provided to…

Well, the reviews on stackoverflow.feedback are quite informative! Dan Manny says: Stack over flow made me loose money!!! Bad code with security wholes in it crashed my clients site!! Warning warning for scammers and Antonio B. of Indonesia says: Best site for solving programming issue!!!11!one! The most user and newbie friendly site! 11/10 would recommend You know you can trust reviews like this!

I think "Stack Overflow Admin"'s response to Dan Manny should speak for itself:

> You fucking moron!!! You lost money because you were so stupid and not being able to differentiate bad code from good code. StackOverflow is not you free personal assistant. You should kill yourself for being so stupid.

Re: The .feedback scam

#23
post #7

Ick. In a way, it is a sort of corporate version of those mugshot sites. I understand a lot of other scams. (Not condone, but I see the attraction of running it.) This one just seems like a lot of work to put into something that I really don't see the targeted companies choosing to go along with. Seems like borrowing a ton of grief - at the very least, they'll be hearing from a bunch of crabby lawyers.

$600 is less than the cost of lawyer time for a worthwhile response, so they may well collect more than we would like to think...

Re: The .feedback scam

#26

Could the major browser providers start just blacklisting these kinds of TLD's? Or grey listing with huge warnings?

Google provides a huge DNS service. Could they just return NXDOMAIN for the entire .feedback TLD?

Re: The .feedback scam

#27
On the topic of scams, has anyone ever discovered what ICANN did with the enormous amount of money it raised by selling these TLDs at a premium?

I recall .blog being purchased by Automattic for 15-20M (that being just 1 example).

ICANN is to tech what the SEC is to finance: A corporate revolving-door where you join to do your corporate-masters bidding and then move back to your 7-figure job.

Re: The .feedback scam

#28

Could the major browser providers start just blacklisting these kinds of TLD's? Or grey listing with huge warnings?

That's a scary precedent... Sure, similar things have been done to prevent visitors from attacks, but this is at best a platform for expressing criticism and at worst a sleazy shakedown of the companies being criticized (not the visitors), and to my knowledge the anti-phishing/malware warnings haven't been used to merely oppose competing interests or stifle ideas.

It's also a massive trademark violation.

Re: The .feedback scam

#30

Similar to .sucks: https://www.namehero.com/startup/controversial-sucks-domain-...

It's essentially the same business model -- attract user-generated content that looks bad for a company, then demand money from them to make it go away.
Post reply on HN