I'm a founder and I'd like to throatpunch your employer. Everything that has been already said is true. What he's doing is illegal. And hey, if the opensource CMS in question is Drupal, shoot me an email, I'm always on the prowl for good Drupallers.
Ask HN: Typical Startup or Abuse?
91–100 of 172 posts
Re: Ask HN: Typical Startup or Abuse?
#92I'm a founder and I'd like to throatpunch your employer. Everything that has been already said is true. What he's doing is illegal. And hey, if the opensource CMS in question is Drupal, shoot me an email, I'm always on the prowl for good Drupallers.
You need to put your email address in your profile so others can find it.
Re: Ask HN: Typical Startup or Abuse?
#93Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have to agree, dude you are making 26k a year. Starting salary for a fresh junior is 40k and that is just someone who know HTML, CSS and Photoshop let alone if they actually know a server side language. He is lying about the 1099 being cheaper, that is only true if you are an S-Corporation, right now you are responsible for a little over 15% for social security, something that you are not if you are W2 or a corp. $…
Just as a tangent, because I didn't want to bother with my own Ask HN: > Starting salary for a fresh junior is 40k and that is just someone who know HTML, CSS and Photoshop let alone if they actually know a server side language. I know, like the back of my hand: HTML, CSS, Photoshop (and Illustrator/InDesign/Premiere/etc), Javascript, PHP, Ruby (not specialized to Rails, but with a year or two of experience in it), a…
I'm not very experienced, but more often than not, the devil lies in the details. Reading K & R is one thing, but being able to track down why your code sometimes gets a SIGILL is an important, perpendicular skill. Perhaps you could try patching some open-source software? If you really know all that you claim to, you'd be invaluable in any project.
Re: Ask HN: Typical Startup or Abuse?
#94I'm a founder and I'd like to throatpunch your employer. Everything that has been already said is true. What he's doing is illegal. And hey, if the opensource CMS in question is Drupal, shoot me an email, I'm always on the prowl for good Drupallers.
And I wish it was Drupal, he refused to move away from .NET. I will say the CMS we used is the worst experience I ever had. It is horribly bloated.
Re: Ask HN: Typical Startup or Abuse?
#95I realize that feelings of loyalty to an employer can skew one's perspective on things. (Oh boy, do I.) You need to hear someone say this, so I'll be a bit blunt: 1) You are being drastically underpaid relative to your market worth. 2) The fact of you being underpaid will cause material hardship for your wife and children. 3) Your boss is exploiting you. Illegally, to boot. 4) Your boss will not stop exploiting you.…
I have to agree, dude you are making 26k a year. Starting salary for a fresh junior is 40k and that is just someone who know HTML, CSS and Photoshop let alone if they actually know a server side language. He is lying about the 1099 being cheaper, that is only true if you are an S-Corporation, right now you are responsible for a little over 15% for social security, something that you are not if you are W2 or a corp. $…
Re: Ask HN: Typical Startup or Abuse?
#96I am confused by this: "and I am still making around $500/week. Which, in the beginning was great. However over the past year I have moved out, bought a car (out of need, the other died), gotten married, and have had a child. (With a second one on the way.)" Why would you have 2 children if you are making $500 a week? Does your spouse make a lot of money? Do you live in one of the developed countries, or a 3rd world…
Oh, I see this: "He still gives all of us a 1099." The 1099 is a form given out by the IRS in the USA. So you are in the USA. What the hell? Why would you have 2 kids on $500 a week in the USA?
lawsuits
Do not be surprised if your "boss" freaks out and threatens you with a lawsuit. He will probably be bluffing. You need to just ignore him and ride out the storm.
I actually had a boss like this once. Not quite as pyscho, but still in the same orbit of madness. What worked for me was quiting. Every time I quit he offered me more money. I went back 4 or 5 times. Over the course of 4 years, my pay went from $15 an hour to $50 an hour.
Mind you, it was important to really quit. Bluffing did not work.
If I said "I will quit" he would say "I am sorry to hear that but we have no extra money that we can pay you."
Only when I quit and went and got another job did he offer me more money.
There came a point when I realized that simply working for him was bad for my career. No matter how much money he paid me, his business was run on a profoundly unprofessional basis. It was never going to lead to something great, and every day working with him was a day spent learning how to deal with a psycho, rather than a day spent learning how to deal with a professional, well run business.
So in the end I quit, and he could not offer me more money to stay.
That is when he started threatening me with lawsuits. These came in 2 varieties:
1.) My non-compete agreement - he briefly argued that my non-compete agreement covered the whole technology industry, so I was not allowed to go to work as a computer programmer anywhere. This was a really a non-issue, partly because no court would uphold such a broad claim, but also because the non-compete agreement had a 2 year limit and when I quit we were only a few weeks away from the end of those 2 years. So the issue just went away.
2.) Copyright. He had stupidly never asked me to sign anything regarding copyright. So I owned the copyright on any code I'd written while an independent contractor for him. He then argued that we had had an implicit agreement, and that he would sue me if I ever re-used the code. But I re-used the code on another project, and he never sued me.
One thing about these kinds of bosses: they crave control. When you quit, they go wild, because you regaining control over yourself. At such times, such bosses go a little crazy. It's best to ignore most of what they say at such times. 99% of the time, it is all bluff.
Re: Ask HN: Typical Startup or Abuse?
#97Earlier quoted context omitted.
Agreed. Originally he brought this up and I was thinking like 10 to 20%. He then said something to the degree of a half percent per year. I unfortunately did sign a non-compete. The founder has pretty tight connections within this industry. It would be hard to steal clients to begin with -- I make sure all of the work is perfect and the clients are happy. I also would feel unethical doing so.
Check your state law, non-compete may not be legal.
Re: Ask HN: Typical Startup or Abuse?
#98Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oh, I see this: "He still gives all of us a 1099." The 1099 is a form given out by the IRS in the USA. So you are in the USA. What the hell? Why would you have 2 kids on $500 a week in the USA?
You also write: "Yet, he treats us like employees. We have required working times, usually 8AM - 6PM, we only get a half hour lunch with no other breaks, and are on-call 24-7. Honestly, those items don't even bother me that much. " On the bright side, it is illegal for him to treat independent contractors like this, so you can sue him if you want. The IRS has been cracking down on exactly this form of abuse lately.
You might be interested in this article:
http://www.inc.com/guides/managing-independent-contractors.h...
This article is actually aimed at the employers, but it warns them about the IRS re-classifying contractors as employees.
Some interesting bits:
"Legally, the contract is a key part of establishing a non-employee relationship, though it doesn't guarantee that the IRS or other agencies will agree that your contractor should not be reclassified as an employee. If the IRS deems an employee misclassified as a contractor, some states – particularly Colorado and Maryland – can enforce hefty tax penalties on the employer. When in doubt, consult the IRS's guidelines on the difference between an independent contractor and an employee here.
With the IRS estimating that 15 percent of the U.S. workforce is misclassified, you'll want to be firmly within legal grounds – and to document a work arrangement meticulously – when working with an independent contractor, so that there is no doubt about the nature of the relationship.
The basic rule, experts say, is that you determine the what and the contractor determines the how. You say you want a piece of market research or a graphic design turned into you by a certain date; the contractor decides how to create these deliverables, subject to your approval. It's important to outline specific goals, but the contractor must provide their own tools, equipment, and facilities to complete the work.
In probing the nature of the relationship, the IRS might examine the contractor's level of freedom, including setting his or her own hours, paying his or her own business expenses, and hiring support staff or assistants as necessary."
Re: Ask HN: Typical Startup or Abuse?
#99I'm a founder and I'd like to throatpunch your employer. Everything that has been already said is true. What he's doing is illegal. And hey, if the opensource CMS in question is Drupal, shoot me an email, I'm always on the prowl for good Drupallers.
Just make sure to never treat your employees mine has treated me! And I wish it was Drupal, he refused to move away from .NET. I will say the CMS we used is the worst experience I ever had. It is horribly bloated.
I've been treated (exploited?) in much the same way as you have in the past; it sucked at the time but I'm a better carer-and-feeder for developers because of the experience. :)
Re: Ask HN: Typical Startup or Abuse?
#100I realize that feelings of loyalty to an employer can skew one's perspective on things. (Oh boy, do I.) You need to hear someone say this, so I'll be a bit blunt: 1) You are being drastically underpaid relative to your market worth. 2) The fact of you being underpaid will cause material hardship for your wife and children. 3) Your boss is exploiting you. Illegally, to boot. 4) Your boss will not stop exploiting you.…
"you CAN negotiate, it isn't evil" This is generally an option, but in this case it is not in the original poster's best interest to negotiate. The only proper course of action is to leave. His employer has demonstrated how he prefers to do business and that's not going to change. Negotiation can win you the battle, but there will be plenty more down the line. Might as well get hired by more scrupulous employers (and…