Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Q: What sorts of acts may constitute obstruction of justice? A: Obstruction may consist of any attempt to hinder the discovery, apprehension, conviction or punishment of anyone who has committed a crime. Q: Does obstruction of justice always involve bribery or physical force? A: No. One particularly murky category of obstruction is the use of "misleading conduct" toward another person for the purpose of obstructing…
Isn't obstruction of justice something that happens after a crime has been committed? If I'm a thief and I do my thieving in the middle of the night when no one is around that's an attempt to hinder discovery but it's not obstruction of justice (I don't think?). Similarly if Uber is operating illegally in a city and they use software to avoid picking up a city official in a sting operation that doesn't sound like obs…
A crime has been committed, even if they don't pick up the officials. If uber is operating illegally, the drivers that have picked anyone up have committed a crime.
Keeping the cars away from the officials trying to ticket and prosecute those drivers is the obstruction.
That is, it's not the "avoiding sting" that causes it to be obstruction, because the crime was committed the second a driver picked someone up. Instead, the obstruction is "helping drivers who have committed crimes not be noticed, ticketed, or prosecuted"
That's definitely obstruction in jurisdictions that have this form of obstruction.