Live data from Hacker News

Make Firefox support moz://a

bugzilla.mozilla.org

61–70 of 176 posts

Re: Make Firefox support moz://a

#62

Until now I didn't realize Mozilla changed their logo. Now I've seen it the typographer in me cries… The whole purpose of text is to _unambigously_ convey information. So either Mozilla now rebrands themself as moz-colon-slash-slash or they now live with a significant portion of typography-anal nerds who dislike that logo.

Well maybe those self-proclaimed typography nerds could take this moment to collectively wonder how all these thousands of companies using fonts other than Helvetica could have fallen for amateurs telling them that fonts could convey emotions, that ambiguity could be artful, that art could have value, or that branding could shape perception.

I mean that one guy named his company "Virgin". How ambiguous is that? He'll have a learn a lot of things. And did you hear about the guys using an emoticon as their logo? Of like a fruit or something?

Good thing marketing doesn't work on me, or anybody else for that matter.

Re: Make Firefox support moz://a

#64

If you're not a logo geek, this is the major website that reviews logo redesigns, on the new Mozilla logo: http://www.underconsideration.com/brandnew/archives/new_logo...

Quote, to maybe nib the ritual hatred in the bud before mozilla becomes the new Apple: "A logo that not only DOESN’T suck but one that has a strong idea, a fresh execution, a promising flexibility, and, that all of it together, sometimes subtly and sometimes overtly, manages to communicate what Mozilla is about." Now if only someone would write an article explaining why considerations such as branding are useful even…

Yes, on the whole they seemed to like it. Which isn't true of many of the redesigns they reviews.

Re: Make Firefox support moz://a

#66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, the issue is the new logo is "moz://a", so when people don't get that it's supposed to mean "mozilla" they'll type it in as "moz://a".

only people who don't know how to use the internet will do that

Isn't that a lot of people?

Re: Make Firefox support moz://a

#67
post #42

While I don't like the branding move at all, I think the concern that people will start calling them moz-colon-forward-slash-forwadslash-a is a little ridiculous. Is Sony's line of laptops Analog Wave One Zero? Is Verizon Verizoncheckmark? Is Johnson & Johnson Johnson ampersand Johnson? Is Comcast CComcast? No, because people aren't complete idiots. Those that are going to know/care about Mozilla will be able to tell…

> No, because people aren't complete idiots.

Sweet summer child.

http://www.gentside.com/le-bon-coin/le-bon-coin-un-ordinateu...

http://i.imgur.com/4nMqG8C.png

http://www.jofogas.hu/veszprem/Sony_mio_laptop_elado_6040346...

http://archiwum.allegro.pl/oferta/sony-mio-pcg-6e1m-laptop-o...

https://www.olx.in/item/sony-wio-laptop-ID19koWZ.html

Re: Make Firefox support moz://a

#68
post #58

Yeah, that will totally solve Mozilla's now so slow fading into irrelevance. VideoLAN.org website stats tell me that Firefox hits percentage dropped from 26.3% through Jan 2016 to 21.2% through Jan 2017. Of course this is not a 100% reliable measure, but stats usually don't lie about that.

> Yeah, that will totally solve Mozilla's now so slow fading into irrelevance.

Neither will constant picking on anything they do or don't do.

> VideoLAN.org website stats tell me that Firefox hits percentage dropped from 26.3% through Jan 2016 to 21.2% through Jan 2017.

I guess the reason might just be that the market is moving towards a new equilibrium.

Unless we start making websites and web apps that only work in other browsers then the web is big enough for both Firefox and other inferior browsers ;-)

Re: Make Firefox support moz://a

#69
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It may not be the best reason, but aren't there already dozens of highly product-specific schemes in use? (such as steam:, unreal:, chrome: in Firefox, chrome: in Chrome - with completely different semantics -, view-source: etc etc)

Are any of those registered with the IANA?

Yep, though most of them are "provisional", which means it isn't a formal or permanent definition. Here's the full list:

https://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/uri-schemes.xht...

Post reply on HN