Does this mean that http:// is httpill? httpsill ftpill ircill sshill
kimjong://
61–70 of 176 posts
Does this mean that http:// is httpill? httpsill ftpill ircill sshill
kimjong://
Until now I didn't realize Mozilla changed their logo. Now I've seen it the typographer in me cries… The whole purpose of text is to _unambigously_ convey information. So either Mozilla now rebrands themself as moz-colon-slash-slash or they now live with a significant portion of typography-anal nerds who dislike that logo.
I mean that one guy named his company "Virgin". How ambiguous is that? He'll have a learn a lot of things. And did you hear about the guys using an emoticon as their logo? Of like a fruit or something?
Good thing marketing doesn't work on me, or anybody else for that matter.
If you're not a logo geek, this is the major website that reviews logo redesigns, on the new Mozilla logo: http://www.underconsideration.com/brandnew/archives/new_logo...
Quote, to maybe nib the ritual hatred in the bud before mozilla becomes the new Apple: "A logo that not only DOESN’T suck but one that has a strong idea, a fresh execution, a promising flexibility, and, that all of it together, sometimes subtly and sometimes overtly, manages to communicate what Mozilla is about." Now if only someone would write an article explaining why considerations such as branding are useful even…
I think the bikeshed should be painted orange!
While I don't like the branding move at all, I think the concern that people will start calling them moz-colon-forward-slash-forwadslash-a is a little ridiculous. Is Sony's line of laptops Analog Wave One Zero? Is Verizon Verizoncheckmark? Is Johnson & Johnson Johnson ampersand Johnson? Is Comcast CComcast? No, because people aren't complete idiots. Those that are going to know/care about Mozilla will be able to tell…
Sweet summer child.
http://www.gentside.com/le-bon-coin/le-bon-coin-un-ordinateu...
http://i.imgur.com/4nMqG8C.png
http://www.jofogas.hu/veszprem/Sony_mio_laptop_elado_6040346...
http://archiwum.allegro.pl/oferta/sony-mio-pcg-6e1m-laptop-o...
Yeah, that will totally solve Mozilla's now so slow fading into irrelevance. VideoLAN.org website stats tell me that Firefox hits percentage dropped from 26.3% through Jan 2016 to 21.2% through Jan 2017. Of course this is not a 100% reliable measure, but stats usually don't lie about that.
Neither will constant picking on anything they do or don't do.
> VideoLAN.org website stats tell me that Firefox hits percentage dropped from 26.3% through Jan 2016 to 21.2% through Jan 2017.
I guess the reason might just be that the market is moving towards a new equilibrium.
Unless we start making websites and web apps that only work in other browsers then the web is big enough for both Firefox and other inferior browsers ;-)
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It may not be the best reason, but aren't there already dozens of highly product-specific schemes in use? (such as steam:, unreal:, chrome: in Firefox, chrome: in Chrome - with completely different semantics -, view-source: etc etc)
Are any of those registered with the IANA?
https://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/uri-schemes.xht...
Everything around this redesign is just a clusterfuck: the process, the winner, the hacks introduced to cope with it, the SEO fail, the loss of identity...
It shows how emo some of the users are.