Earlier quoted context omitted.
There was no collateral damage to people in the field due to the Manning leaks, so I guess she figured it out.
How do you know?
I think it is safe to assume this leak will have seriously affected the US diplomacy.
231–240 of 797 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
There was no collateral damage to people in the field due to the Manning leaks, so I guess she figured it out.
How do you know?
I think it is safe to assume this leak will have seriously affected the US diplomacy.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Come on now, "They" does not imply any gender and is appropriate to describe any person
Sorry, non-native speaker here. But wouldn't "they" apply when you don't know when the gender of the person? In this case you do know.
When you don't know the gender, however, it is really convenient to use "they", so albeit the incorrect form, with time it started to take hold. Lately gender politics have acted as a catalyst as some people outright tell you they prefer that you use the "they/them" pronouns. Since a lot of folks are already comfortable using they/them, it works.
A different tactic is to just substitute something else entirely. Books like On Writing encourage young writers to avoid the situation and try to substitute other words rather than use "they" or just default to "he." An example might be using the word "writer". For example the books recommends instead of using "He should learn to use semicolons only when absolutely necessary" use "The writer should learn to use..." instead.
I think the latter method is harder in non-formal threads like this. "The imprisoned already has served 7 years" works, but comes across as really impersonal.
Seven years is still a long time for whistle blowing. I'm glad to see she is still getting released though. It's important to note commuting the sentence is not a pardon. Chelsea will still have this conviction for the rest of her life. I know there is a lot of controversy with Manning compared to Wikileaks et. al. as far as not redacting documents or using a discriminating news source to filter them. Still, I oppose…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not atypical for a president to wait until the end of their term to issue pardons and commutations, for legacy, or any other consideration.
That's true. However, if the supposed motivation is because somebody is suffering ...why wait another day, another week, another month, another year ? If this took place before the election, you could call it a principled decision. If this took place immediately after the election, you could call it a cautious-but-nevertheless-sound decision that might have otherwise been passed on to a (presumably friendly) successo…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you're knowledgable enough to censor the documents yourself before release, that's the way to go. Not everyone has perfect knowledge. Releasing only to journalists and stuff is a fairly good method too, but maybe create unnecessary exposure. Manning also went for a bulk dump strategy rather than being selective. Ultimately when you're dealing with a lot of data, that might be the only reasonable way to get it, but…
Snowden was very selective, and look where that got him...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I sort of wonder if it would matter. Whether they should or not, I really doubt the parts of the government he pissed off will forgive him just because they are told to.
A pardon would allow him a valid passport to travel to a different country that would be willing to house him without having to ignore extradition requests. He would not need to return to the US if he felt endangered there.
Commuting Manning's sentence without pardoning Snowden feels like politics to me. Manning's actions embarrassed the Bush administration so Obama will commute. Snowden's actions embarrassed the Obama administration so Obama won't pardon.
Obama has said that the two cases are different in that Manning has gone through the legal system, sentenced, and serving time, whereas Snowden is in a country that doesn't have an extradition treaty with the US and hasn't been tried under the US legal system.
I think having your mind fractured and been forcibly turned into a 'woman' as a deterrent to future whistleblowers is a living hell, that's a lifetime of punishment even when he's out of jail.