Live data from Hacker News

Diamonds Suck (2006)

diamondssuck.com

591–600 of 618 posts

Re: Diamonds Suck (2006)

#591
post #4

Great advice. Possibly coming from someone who doesn't have a girlfriend. :) try to give such a stone to a girl and see how amused she is gonna be. You are just gonna sound "cheap". Diamonds are a status, not a beautiful stone. edit: I see many downvotes. Guys, seriously, was it for me, I would buy nothing. It's just how this world works. You can express your anger by downvoting me, I'll be fine, but please don't fal…

You have bad taste in women it seems.

Re: Diamonds Suck (2006)

#592

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If we're dead-set on continuing to use pretty rocks as signals Why do we need signals? Why does the social contract of marriage need an expensive down payment on essentially nothing? These are things modern cultures should be distancing themselves from. The down payment should be for a house or apartment, or just anything useful.

> Why do we need signals? Signals are an essential aspect of human behavior. I don't think trying to eliminate signaling is a productive goal. You yourself brought up the "social contract" of marriage. A contract is not very powerful if there aren't consequences for breaking it. So that's one crucial signal: we are committed enough to this relationship to spend money on something which is only useful as a signal. The…

If you need money to show your devotion and dedication to a relationship, you will be having a hard time. A relationship makes sense as long as parties enjoy each others company regardless of the size of diamond on the finger.

If something external, such as an expensive ring, is to keep the relationship afloat, I have hard time seeing a point of living and sharing your life with someone.

Re: Diamonds Suck (2006)

#593
post #96

I told my girlfriend (5 years) how I feel about diamonds and that I reject the very notion of buying a diamond engagement / wedding ring early on in our relationship. Several months ago, we landed on the marriage conversation, again. I reiterated that I am against diamond engagement bands. She then said: "What about a wedding ring then?" I told her it applies to wedding rings as well. We got into a heated argument an…

Did you get to the point of explaining why you're against diamonds? Was she able to tell you why she wants a diamond in particular? To resolve this issue it would be good to exchange the exact, real reasons why one side wants the diamond and the other doesn't. But even then, it may end up your GF will insist on the diamond - while all the rational-in-the-vacuum reasons are against diamonds, there's this whole thing c…

If after the overwhelming evidence, you can't still reach a reasonable agreement, I think that is a very good reason to not marry someone. That is a the kind of pattern that would repeat for the rest of the life, and at some point you will max out and burst by spoiling the marriage.

Why not instead be with someone who you can reason?

Re: Diamonds Suck (2006)

#594

People buy diamonds for a lot of the same 'irrational' reasons they believe in religion. Brainwashing. Girls have it pounded into their head over and over all their lives that this diamond is a MUST so they never think with their own brains about it. 99% of people would never spend $10K on a single piece of jewlery, if it was logic and reason, as opposed to pure brainwashing, that was governing their decisions. So ac…

Alot of women think this of men when they see us drop $60k-80k+ on car instead of getting a cheapo Toyota.

Also nuts, if you ask me. You can get a perfectly good second hand car for a tenth of that. Unless you want a Tesla; then you've got to pay.

Re: Diamonds Suck (2006)

#595

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have known people that spent $18k-30k. If I was on the other side it would scare me that my partner was willing to blow that much money on a novelty. It's a sign that they are bad with money.

I paid a three digit sum and chose the ring based on what my girlfriend likes. She loves it.

Something personal yet affordable is a much better idea than burning money on an expensive but impersonal status symbol.

Re: Diamonds Suck (2006)

#596

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Then give a donation receipt for a charity that you both support for the cost of the diamond instead. At least that way the sacrificed money will support something you both believe in rather than the diamond industry.

It's also to display for others, not just for the receiver of the ring.

Frame the donation receipt and display it in a prominent position.

Wastefulness as a status symbol is a really harmful idea. I'd prefer someone who is smart with money.

Re: Diamonds Suck (2006)

#597

I go out to collect gemstones as a hobby on the weekends. And it only took a half day class to learn how to shape them for jewelry. So while some people still like diamonds, I prefer to give hand-collected and crafted stones. They might not be worth as much, but I made them myself and can guarantee nobody was harmed or screwed over in the process.

Much more personal too. I like it.

Re: Diamonds Suck (2006)

#598

Interesting read and great points. But the reason I'm shopping for a diamond is precisely that it is too expensive. It's supposed to be proof that I am glad to make sacrifices for her. If we wanted to do something nontraditional we might choose some completely different kind of ring, but to choose something that looks super expensive and is not would make me feel like I had cut corners for my fiance.

You can make that sacrifice is more productive ways. You could give to charity, for example. Or use it for future financial security, like a deposit for your first house, kids' college fund, or something like that.

Re: Diamonds Suck (2006)

#599
post #578

>Sorry about Trump, BTW. Why on earth do you think that sort of random political non-sequitur is appropriate?

We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12945175 and marked it off-topic.

But leave the initial off topic and inflammatory political attack there. Very unbiased non-partisan moderation.

Re: Diamonds Suck (2006)

#600
post #277

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Horse meat is quite normal in western culture, unless if by western culture you mean anglophone countries.

I can't reply to stouset for some stupid reason, but why is it "absurd" to not want to eat horse for texture reasons? My understanding is that horse meat generally does not taste that good and is very tough, because those animals get a lot of exercise; it's like deer meat. Some people like venison, and there's no stigma attached to eating it, but it's hard to buy because demand is low (and they're not raised as lives…

Deer meet is hard to buy, at least in the US, partly because the US has ridiculous laws prohibiting transportation of venison from US deer across state lines in various ways.

> and they're not raised as livestock

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deer_farm#Deer_Farming_in_New_... -- not quite as many of them as sheep there, but you definitely see a bunch of deer farms just driving around.

In fact, in my experience you're more likely to see New Zealand venison in a US store than US venison, because of the above laws prohibiting transportation.

Post reply on HN