Live data from Hacker News

Replacement Samsung Galaxy Note 7 phone catches fire on Southwest plane

theverge.com

81–90 of 195 posts

Re: Replacement Samsung Galaxy Note 7 phone catches fire on Southwest plane

#81
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm much more worried about something like this in a check-in bag, where the fire can spread uncontrollably. At least in cabin you will notice the fire early and can use the fire extinguisher.

I don't think lithium batteries are allowed in check luggage. You're supposed to carry them on.

I believe it's batteries on their own - as long as they are in a device I believe it's fine (if not I've been breaking the law...).

Re: Replacement Samsung Galaxy Note 7 phone catches fire on Southwest plane

#82
post #71

"He has already replaced it with an iPhone 7." This is the biggest FU to samsung.

The commercial writes itself. Apple should be in negotiations with the guy already.

I'd say that's beneath Apple. They usually don't attack competitors directly (used to WAY back, but now now).

At least I really hope it is. Twisting the knife at something like this would be a pretty horrible thing to do.

Re: Replacement Samsung Galaxy Note 7 phone catches fire on Southwest plane

#83
post #82
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The commercial writes itself. Apple should be in negotiations with the guy already.

I'd say that's beneath Apple. They usually don't attack competitors directly (used to WAY back, but now now). At least I really hope it is. Twisting the knife at something like this would be a pretty horrible thing to do.

Leaders (or at least those who perceive themselves to be) rarely have a need to attack those who are underneath them.

Re: Replacement Samsung Galaxy Note 7 phone catches fire on Southwest plane

#84
post #82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'd say that's beneath Apple. They usually don't attack competitors directly (used to WAY back, but now now). At least I really hope it is. Twisting the knife at something like this would be a pretty horrible thing to do.

Leaders (or at least those who perceive themselves to be) rarely have a need to attack those who are underneath them.

True, that's why it would feel so cheap. Back when Apple had 4% of the PC market (before iPod) it made sense.

Re: Replacement Samsung Galaxy Note 7 phone catches fire on Southwest plane

#85
What percentage of Galaxy Note 7 owners know they have a Galaxy Note 7?

I imagine some break down is: I have an Android phone. I have a Samsung phone. I have a Samsung Galaxy. I have a Samsung Galaxy Note.

But Samsung Galaxy Note 7, specifically? I'm guessing at best 50% might know that.

Re: Replacement Samsung Galaxy Note 7 phone catches fire on Southwest plane

#86
post #39
post #4

This entire episode seems hard to believe. How could Sammy fail so hard after so many years of industry knowledge? What corners did they cut? Is it just unbalanced reporting or possibly sabotage? Seriously don't believe they got wrong what everyone else seems to have dodged.

They're not the only ones, even recently. http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/08/mcdonalds-recalls-hap... http://thenextweb.com/gadgets/2016/08/04/psa-basis-peak-wear... http://www.pcworld.com/article/3050377/hardware/major-toshib... https://www.nextpowerup.com/news/29739/xiaomi-mi-band-2-is-p... https://www.cpsc.gov/Recalls/2016/Denon-Recalls-Rechargeable...

Even the iPhone 7 is not immune; my boss got one that suddenly started overheating and he had to get it replaced.

http://forums.macrumors.com/threads/iphone-7-randomly-overhe...

Re: Replacement Samsung Galaxy Note 7 phone catches fire on Southwest plane

#87
post #77

Some of the datacenters I visit have signs on them forbidding people from having Samsung Note 7s on the floor. "Keep them in your car," one of the signs said. Hmmm, maybe storing them near many liters of gasoline isn't the best idea . . .

I'm sure they'd rather you lose your car than their entire data center

Re: Replacement Samsung Galaxy Note 7 phone catches fire on Southwest plane

#89
post #4

This entire episode seems hard to believe. How could Sammy fail so hard after so many years of industry knowledge? What corners did they cut? Is it just unbalanced reporting or possibly sabotage? Seriously don't believe they got wrong what everyone else seems to have dodged.

I see the whole fiasco to be deeply related to how Samsung is run and controlled by the infamous Lee family. Note 7's battery is made by Samsung SDI, one of Samsung's subsidiaries, and I assume that SDI gets most of its revenues directly from Samsung Electronics. When you (SDI) have Samsung as your guaranteed customer, you don't really have to compete or try to survive. Besides, Samsung always set their flagship release dates based on expected Apple's iPhone releases, always trying to ship to market few weeks before Apple. When your release dates are set to your competitors' pace, not your own, you will certainly make mistakes like this.

Re: Replacement Samsung Galaxy Note 7 phone catches fire on Southwest plane

#90
post #32

I think you're forgetting your forum. HN has a very very pro-Apple bias. Anything good for Apple or bad for Apples competitors will get a disproportionate amount of attention here.

Yes. It is a pro-Apple bias that is causing people to be worried/upset about cell phone batteries that can spontaneously catch on fire. You've figured out the conspiracy.

No, but it's pro-Apple bias that makes you think that this only happens to Samsung.

https://bgr.com/2016/10/04/iphone-6s-battery-explosion-fire/

https://bgr.com/2016/09/30/iphone-7-plus-battery-explosion-a...

Post reply on HN