Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Bike manufacturer sees huge reduction in delivery damage by printing TV on box

medium.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

231–240 of 245 posts

Re: Bike manufacturer sees huge reduction in delivery damage by printing TV on box

#231

Post by dvirsky »

john_reel wrote: post #227
dvirsky wrote: post #171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Quotas, deadlines, bottom lines I guess companies can in some cases track damages backwards and add these to the quotas and bottom lines. When I was 18 I worked for a few months on the assembly line at a Motorola manufacturing plant, assembling radio communication devices. It was a shit job with minimum wage and we had to meet strict quotas, but assembly errors were also counted, (the goal was "six sigma", https://…

What was your hack?

It was really stupid. There were these LED 2-digit panels (something like this: http://bit.ly/2d9fa3a) that my job was to screw into the case.

Anyway, the connector cables were manually soldered to them at a nearby station, and the ladies who did the soldering used to just pile the LED panels in a box, and as a result some of them would get scratches on the visible part and had to be thrown away. At the same time, the speakers I would also screw-in, came in these grid-like trays, where each speaker was placed in a small rectangular cell.

My brilliant idea was to recycle these cardboard trays and have the solderers place the finished circuits in them, so they'd never damage each other. It saved 10-20 defected panels a month IIRC. Not enough to get me bonus, but enough to get me a cheap FM radio and a certificate.

A guy who worked there at the time optimized some circuit board printing procedure and saved the company IIRC like $100K a year (or was it a month?), and got a very big bonus.

Re: Bike manufacturer sees huge reduction in delivery damage by printing TV on box

#232

Post by martin-adams »

muthdra wrote: post #38
delinka wrote: post #24

For Science: Let's see if LG's willing to have some TV boxes printed with bicycles...

BREAKING: Television manufacturers receive threats from printing companies.

If HP manufactured the bycicles then they would have a short print cycle.

Re: Bike manufacturer sees huge reduction in delivery damage by printing TV on box

#233

Post by frostymarvelous »

icanhackit wrote: post #201
charlieegan3 wrote: post #88

Related: https://www.atheistberlin.com/study - Shoe company finds relationship between lost packages and package branding.

Atheist shoes? I'd worry they'd arrive without soles... ...I'll see myself out.

That was pretty good.

Re: Bike manufacturer sees huge reduction in delivery damage by printing TV on box

#234

Post by younghak »

In Korea, the magic phrase is 'contains kimchi' and you are guaranteed of safe delivery. All hell break loose when kimchi leaks; boxes get wet and smelly, kimchi stains don't come off easy so delivery people take extra measures to prevent it.

Re: Bike manufacturer sees huge reduction in delivery damage by printing TV on box

#235

Post by tomaskafka »

Darthy wrote: post #200

I see a possible solution here using technology: Senders should add a small $1 "black box" recording acceleration data, and shipping companies should be able to query for a certain package and a certain timestamp, which employee was accountable at that moment. Then when you receive a broken package, the black box tells you the timestamp when it was thrown to the ground, you tell that to the shipping company, which th…

I've seen even cheaper thing on a machinery that shouldn't be tipped over - a liquid in a U shaped open ended plastic pipe on a sticker. Tip it over too much, the (coloured) liquid spills out onto the package and tells the recipient to refuse the package.

Re: Bike manufacturer sees huge reduction in delivery damage by printing TV on box

#236

Post by lttlrck »

Bikes are not packed particular well. The top and bottom staples pull out quite easily and could pop out under reasonable twisting. They really should be strapped.

I bought a bike from Jet and it arrived damaged, the box popped open, parts had fallen out. Returned that (trouble free which was nice) and ordered another from Amazon instead.

Amazon have a checkbox to have large deliveries that would normally not be in an Amazon branded box placed in one at no extra cost. Checked that box knowing it would act as sacrificial outer layer.

Re: Bike manufacturer sees huge reduction in delivery damage by printing TV on box

#237

Post by ocdtrekkie »

startling wrote: post #98
hunterwerlla wrote: post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Even worse when you can't get your package because they give no delivery window and attempt to deliver it to you during class, make you pick it up somewhere, then say it's your fault for not being at home 24/7.

My apartment door buzzer calls my phone. Generally they don't even attempt to buzz me , and then make me pick it up on the other side of the city.

Very neat. I was hoping to unintrusively tinker with my buzzer in my condo, but I found that the wires coming out of the back of the device used some sort of signaling system, and I couldn't just use my own controller to switch on the door buzzer to let someone in from my phone.

Re: Bike manufacturer sees huge reduction in delivery damage by printing TV on box

#238

Post by treehau5 »

post-it wrote: post #166
treehau5 wrote: post #117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can we replace you with a robot so I never have to read such an ignorant, inhumane comment again? Why don't we try treating low wage workers like their valuable, and give them more credit when they do a good job instead of their CEO's getting the big bonuses? You'd be amazed what people are capable of when treated right. If you still get losers smashing up boxes, fire them. By that point there will be a line of appli…

Why do you want people to have to work? A job automated is a person that doesn't need to work.

It has nothing to do with me wanting people to work, but with people wanting to work.

Believe it or not, some people want to work. Many are raised on the principle of you need to work to eat, and will continue to raise their kids in this fashion for the unforeseeable future. Call it what you want, it is just the way some people live their life and find worth. We have to stop and ask ourselves why on earth would we want to even automate all work? It always goes down some utilitarian route, and I am saddened to see that this is the only ethical framework that has room in modern, capitalistic society.

> A job automated is a person that doesn't need to work.

False. A job automated is a person that a company doesn't need a worker for. There is a difference, in that now that person doesn't get paid. Company makes more money. This will be the situation until we reach the fabled "automation utopia" where all the essentials are taken care of such as food, shelter, water, travel, medicine, law, governance, and humans are left to frolic around to and fro. Until then, there will be hundreds of years of human suffering. Let's stop this endless pursuit to automate which is driven largely by profit, and focus our attention on solving human suffering. We have better things to be doing with our time than to figure out how to replace everyone's job.

Re: Bike manufacturer sees huge reduction in delivery damage by printing TV on box

#239

Post by woliveirajr »

adwn wrote: post #186
woliveirajr wrote: post #143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One of the items I saw costs $146 for 50 units. But the best was reading that they are delivered by truck (to avoid airplanes shocks?) And would be funny too receive a box and find that all your 50 units were activated due to their delivery:-)

The shock sensors we use are delivered "unarmed", i.e., they have a little pin that holds the sensor in place. This pin is removed the moment you expose the sticky tape to attach the shock sensor to the package.

Are they ok? Reasonable price? Could you name it? Thanks :-)

Re: Bike manufacturer sees huge reduction in delivery damage by printing TV on box

#240

Post by thaumasiotes »

function_seven wrote: post #84
thaumasiotes wrote: post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If they were already doing their best, a picture on the side of the box wouldn't improve their performance.

It sure would. When "their best" is some tradeoff between speed and care. If the workers treat every single package as if it were a Ming Dynasty vase, then their throughput will drop through the floor and that won't be their best. If they treat every single package as if it were a box of rocks, then their breakage rate will skyrocket. That also won't be their best. Putting the TV on the side of the box tells the work…

By your own hypothesis, putting the picture on the side of the box leads to worse performance, not better performance.
Post reply on HN