Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Not because one is in agreeance with the alleged "racial" distinctions That's what I said, the word is being used with a different/wider meaning and not with that narrower original meaning. > (in the mind of the racist) I doubt the attackers thought of the Polish person as of a different "race" as in the biological meaning of that word. Same thing, shift of meaning of the word.
I doubt the attackers thought of the Polish person as of a different "race" as in the biological meaning of that word. That's the thing -- "race" doesn't really have a biological meaning. If anything it's just a vague suspicion that certain people are inferior or "alien" because of their DNA, the breeding, or simply their cultural upbringing. Of course it's all invented tripe, and biologically speaking it's equally u…
> "race" doesn't really have a biological meaning
Please work with me. Communication requires willing partners, I don't know where you want to take this sub-thread? I know "race" does not exist - and yet we did (and do) have the word. We were talking about language and meanings, not truth. Enough people did (and do) associate a biological meaning - what an actual geneticist has to say about that is besides the point.And now the meaning of that word has shifted. That is all I said.