Live data from Hacker News

Fighting Cancer

hintjens.com

131–140 of 162 posts

Re: Fighting Cancer

#131

I am not sure why cryonics are not in the menu of every reader here when he has the opportunity (you don't have it if you die in a sudden accident) to subscribe when it seems inevitable to die.

Not all of us want to live again in some unknown future without any sense of continuity or surviving relationships. Death is ultimately inevitable, even if a miracle like cryonics could postpone it the first time. The author's entire point is that we should accept this inevitability, not try to avoid it by any psychological means we can conjure. Only then can we respond appropriately.

If we manage to make cryonics work what tells you that people you know will not do it in the future or technology didn't make them live much (much) longer than expected? Why accept something as fact when there is an above zero chance that you can live longer?

Re: Fighting Cancer

#132

This is a really important read. Nobody really gets terminal illness until you're either terminally ill, or right on the fringe of it. Even those of us who are one degree away from it only have the vaguest notion of it. It seems like something on the order of 30% of human prose ever written struggles with this notion of mortality [1], yet very few words are devoted to how to care about someone who is terminally ill,…

That might be your perspective but after being in hospitals and treatment for a lifetime condition, I saw enough of my peers die by the age of 10 that I think I have a pretty good handle on mortality. It's just a very uncomfortable subject, which I think hinges on our species not knowing "what happens" after the body dies. Well, there are lots of claims and plenty of options by way of choosing a faith, but I'm fairly…

It sounds like you might be on the fringe of it, friend. And I don't disagree with you—it is an uncomfortable subject, and for those lucky enough to have it be merely a vague notion of something I'm going to have to deal with "one day", very few people really do know how to respond to it. But I am sorry that your condition gave you such familiarity with the subject at such a young age.

Re: Fighting Cancer

#133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have to agree with this. People can't be expected to know what every individual would prefer to hear in every conceivable circumstance. Platitudes are often an oblique way of saying "I empathize and I wish you the best" while not being discouraging. Actually saying the above might be preferable, but it's unfair to criticize the gesture, I think. If I mention this, it's because I think there are parallels to be draw…

It's absolutely fair to criticize the gesture. You know how SJW's tell outsiders to check their privilege when they make the discussion about themselves? Platitudes similarly make the discussion about themselves instead of the cancer patient. "Fight it." Wow, you're so optimistic! "Eat more fruit." You're so knowledgeable! Since you're a certified nutritionist, am I eating enough Quinoa? http://thelastpsychiatrist.co…

It's weird that you use the dismissive pejorative 'SJW', then take up their argument yourself.

Re: Fighting Cancer

#134
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> What's really sad is that the state of progress in cancer treatment is extremely slow. This is massively false. There are great strides made for numerous cancers, while for some others (pancreatic, colorectal being among the worst) there are still not many good options. For pancreatic cancer the main issue is that it's very hard to detect in early stages and when you get the symptoms you are basically already in st…

If early detection can make a big difference, then clearly that is the low hanging fruit of cancer research.

This would require a test that is (a) cheap (so that it can be applied to basically everyone) and (b) has extremely low false positive ratio (because a particular kind of cancer is a rare thing). Repeat for every different kind of cancer.

For these reasons I'm not sure that it'll end up being a lower hanging fruit than vastly better treatment of late detected cancer for the kinds that are usually detected very late now.

Re: Fighting Cancer

#135
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Strange, from what I read (including interviews with oncologists) cancer treatment is massively improving, with new treatments available and many fundamental advances in the pipeline. The future is looking bright, with cancer becoming a manageable chronic illness in the next decades.

An oncologist gave a friend of mine the ridiculous opinion that there would be a cure for cancer within 5 years. That was 6 years ago. I say ridiculous because medicine is awash with similar predictions, the vast majority of which have never come true, or materialise far far later than anticipated. The future does indeed look bright... from the very specific perspective of the researchers. Unfortunately if you are so…

"Cure for cancer" or "cure for that particular cancer"? First one sounds bizarre (cancer is a set of diseases that are generally similar, but very different in specifics), second is essentially already true for some kinds of cancer (e.g. testicular cancer in males).

Re: Fighting Cancer

#136
I have the utmost respect for Pieter, wherever I encounter his work it always shows passion and quality. Recently I read The Psychopath Code which I highly recommend especially to those who think they've never encountered one. While you can still read this: thank you. You have improved my life in multiple ways.

Re: Fighting Cancer

#137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's absolutely fair to criticize the gesture. You know how SJW's tell outsiders to check their privilege when they make the discussion about themselves? Platitudes similarly make the discussion about themselves instead of the cancer patient. "Fight it." Wow, you're so optimistic! "Eat more fruit." You're so knowledgeable! Since you're a certified nutritionist, am I eating enough Quinoa? http://thelastpsychiatrist.co…

Making the discussion about oneself means its not really a gesture to begin with. I agree with your example but I think it's a different thing altogether.

What a coincidence. Not only is the gesture supportive, it frames the speaker in a positive light! Just like how startups offer perks like catered lunches because the company cares about work/life balance, right? "How convenient, it just so happens that offering cheap-perks allows us to attract top-talent at half the cost". Notice how the CEO never has to consciously register that s/he's fooling anyone. From inside the mind, it all just looks like a convenient coincidence. Narratives are convenient because they can improve public relations without changing behavior.

Plausible Deniability is why these gestures are socially acceptable. "I'm sorry to hear that" or "that sucks" (i.e. acknowledgment) would suffice. But that's not what Pieter Hintjens' associates told him, is it? Instead, they went the extra mile by offering unwarranted advice. Notice that "I'm sorry to hear that" doesn't connote that the speaker holds relevant information, and is therefore important and worth paying attention to. Regardless of how we define gesture, it is not lost on Hintjens that the stock phrases he receives nudge the conversation in a particular direction.

Re: Fighting Cancer

#138
post #74

I found out I had colorectal cancer 4 years ago at 33. It was a shock because I go to the gym 4-5 times a week and taught brazilian jiu jitsu nightly. There no living right or living wrong prescription that will spare you. It can catch anyone at any time just like the author states. Aside from dealing with the disease, one of the biggest issues I found was disbursing information and managing the emotions of my friend…

[deleted]

Re: Fighting Cancer

#139

This is a really important read. Nobody really gets terminal illness until you're either terminally ill, or right on the fringe of it. Even those of us who are one degree away from it only have the vaguest notion of it. It seems like something on the order of 30% of human prose ever written struggles with this notion of mortality [1], yet very few words are devoted to how to care about someone who is terminally ill,…

The book, When Breath Becomes Air, is about the best thing I've ever read relating to terminal illness. It was written by Dr Paul Kalanithi, a brilliant neurosurgery resident at Stanford.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00XSSYR50/

Re: Fighting Cancer

#140
post #126
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is a really weird situation (I'm trying to put myself in your friends position). I guess I'd revert into this BS nice talk as a way to help you emotionally (even though I know it's BS). So -assuming that I do care and that situation makes me sad- what am I supposed to say? How could I really help?

A big hug, if they're the kind of person who likes hugs and you're close enough to hug. And not hiding your sadness while doing so. Or "I'm sorry to hear that. Is there anything I can do?" Or any general statement of empathy. I've been in a similar situation, and those were the best replies. But everyone is different, so I'd ask a few more people what were good responses. Probably whatever multiple people mention is…

> Or "I'm sorry to hear that. Is there anything I can do?"

> Or any general statement of empathy. I've been in a similar situation, and those were the best replies.

In a similar vein, "that sucks" seems appropriate.

Post reply on HN