Disingenuously left out of your arguments hereFirst, this is way out of line. I'm going to reply anyway, but please don't do this kind of thing in your next reply.
Second, instead of treating it like a black box that has a fixed cost that we have to accept, take a medical education apart the way Musk would do when figuring the ultimate cost of one his cars or rockets:
Putting people in a room, books in their hands, and having them sit in front of a lecturer is not actually that expensive. I won't name names, but two medical students I knew in the last fifteen years actually skipped most of their lectures, studied straight out of the book and did just fine.
It is true that the hands-on aspect of medical training is more expensive, but people in much poorer countries manage to do it.
Even if you managed to show that this education outlined above is inferior to the ones available today, right now I'd still be overjoyed to see a doctor educated in this manner. It's better than waiting two months (note that this is not even for treatment - it's just a biopsy!) while I can feel this thing getting bigger, with sharper pain as time goes on.
Finally, what is the point here? An more economically "equal" society, or a society where people like me don't die waiting in line for care? I stridently advocate for the latter.