Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are you sure ?
I'm not sure why I'm replying to what look like sockpuppets, but that photo looks nothing like Supermicro equipment. (Of course, "100% designed by our R&D teams" can mean "we sent the ODM a Powerpoint with some diagrams in it".)
C2: Affordable X86-64 Servers
201–210 of 231 posts
Re: C2: Affordable X86-64 Servers
#202Earlier quoted context omitted.
For what it's worth: I created an account to try it out in January, played a bit with a cheap instance, and deleted the instance. Got billed in February (about 1€) while there was strictly no activity going on. Got to wait until end of March for the account to close, and with everything turned off I can see another bill coming in for 0.50€. Cannot remove my credit card details. Don't care much about the undue handful…
Did you release your public IPv4 address? This isn't done automatically and I believe it is billed at 0.50€ per address while you are "holding on" to an unused address.
Re: C2: Affordable X86-64 Servers
#203The blade servers at Delimiter ( https://www.delimiter.com/ ) are even more affordable. I pay $20 a month for a dual Xeon blade with 16gb of ram. They did have a very long downtime this year with no service credit, but uptime has been reasonable over the past year. If you're looking for a hobby box it's a pretty good deal.
How long was the "very long downtime"? Hours, days, weeks?
They kept everyone in the loop, and it's the only downtime I've noticed from them.
Re: C2: Affordable X86-64 Servers
#204how easy is it to boot/install your own OS on these bare metal servers? some of these offers look interesting for unikernels.
I don't have any experience with Scaleway, but Vultr allows you to upload your own ISO and install it (even Windows Server). However, it's purely a VPS at competitive prices, not bare metal. Their bare metal servers start at $60USD/month.
Re: C2: Affordable X86-64 Servers
#205If you want even more affordable (but lower performance), http://lowendspirit.com/
I would be careful with them. I've bought couple VPSes there and there was always an issues. In one instance provider vanished after 3 months, in another one VPS is still live but it's terrible slow (high ping latency). I am not complaining much because I paid for them ~$7/year (yes, thats year) but still, the same companies offer more expensive options and I wouldn't risk data lost. Use DigitalOcean, I think its ver…
Re: C2: Affordable X86-64 Servers
#206I've been very pleased with http://packet.net and their typo 0 server. It's bare metal, but much more performant than here. They have an amazing network, it's by the hour, and it's Also they're based in the US, so less latency for those of us with primary customer bases here. We use them at DNSFilter in NYC as part of our anycast network, for the last two months. Looking forward to their San Jose and Amsterdam datace…
Why do you use http://packet.net as a URL in your comment when this only redirects to a www.packet.net subdomain, on Cloudflare? Why not just use http://www.packet.net ? From the perspective of the user, wouldn't it be "more performant" to skip the gratuitous redirect, extra GET request and DNS lookups? Maybe this is just marketing? Setting referrer, cookies? Fear of a thundering herd arising from an HN comment? Inad…
Re: C2: Affordable X86-64 Servers
#207I've been very pleased with http://packet.net and their typo 0 server. It's bare metal, but much more performant than here. They have an amazing network, it's by the hour, and it's Also they're based in the US, so less latency for those of us with primary customer bases here. We use them at DNSFilter in NYC as part of our anycast network, for the last two months. Looking forward to their San Jose and Amsterdam datace…
Why do you use http://packet.net as a URL in your comment when this only redirects to a www.packet.net subdomain, on Cloudflare? Why not just use http://www.packet.net ? From the perspective of the user, wouldn't it be "more performant" to skip the gratuitous redirect, extra GET request and DNS lookups? Maybe this is just marketing? Setting referrer, cookies? Fear of a thundering herd arising from an HN comment? Inad…
Re: C2: Affordable X86-64 Servers
#208Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can confirm. Dual core Atom loading bare Wordpress is a nightmare without caching, and still barely acceptable with caching.
I found the issue. Wordpress.
Re: C2: Affordable X86-64 Servers
#209Re: C2: Affordable X86-64 Servers
#210The blade servers at Delimiter ( https://www.delimiter.com/ ) are even more affordable. I pay $20 a month for a dual Xeon blade with 16gb of ram. They did have a very long downtime this year with no service credit, but uptime has been reasonable over the past year. If you're looking for a hobby box it's a pretty good deal.
I got super excited at first, but then... The servers are based on: http://ark.intel.com/products/33927/Intel-Xeon-Processor-E54... and http://ark.intel.com/products/47927/Intel-Xeon-Processor-L56... These are super ancient. If you're looking for affordable north american servers, OVH has the Kimsufi outlet which is cheaper and better hardware. They've got a data center in Canada and will give you American IPs from t…
We have a few customers who purchase servers by the chassis (16 blades) to use for crawlers and other applications where they can scale horizontally. When you compare the E5420's at $20/month to even a lot of cloud hosts, you're getting quite a bit of dedicated resources vs. smaller allocations on newer shared gear.
Totally depends on what you're running though.