Live data from Hacker News

Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

syonyk.blogspot.com

321–330 of 367 posts

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#321
post #198

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The aftermarket community for existing cars basically doesn't care about emissions --- one of the biggest attractions of an electric. You've clearly never been behind the wheel of a Tesla. Please go drive one. Emissions were literally the very last reason for buying the car for me.

Between the touch screen control screaming "Look! Cool! Future! Oh yeah we had to sacrifice tactile feedback and usability when driving while ignoring fifty years of safety research but Cool!", trying to be a fast car but only really good for 0-60 in a straight line (and literally incapable of doing five laps at Laguna Seca without overheating and going into limp home mode), no OBD-2 port as another poster pointed ou…

I'm guessing you've never driven a Model S?

If you like the way a high-end electric car drives, there's little comparison between a Model S and the BMW/Benz.

And Tesla has completely changed the paradigm of car design and manufacturing. The fact that it can add self-driving to its cars with an over-the-air software update is amazing.

People might buy for the zero emissions but they stay for the ride.

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#322
post #321

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Between the touch screen control screaming "Look! Cool! Future! Oh yeah we had to sacrifice tactile feedback and usability when driving while ignoring fifty years of safety research but Cool!", trying to be a fast car but only really good for 0-60 in a straight line (and literally incapable of doing five laps at Laguna Seca without overheating and going into limp home mode), no OBD-2 port as another poster pointed ou…

I'm guessing you've never driven a Model S? If you like the way a high-end electric car drives, there's little comparison between a Model S and the BMW/Benz. And Tesla has completely changed the paradigm of car design and manufacturing. The fact that it can add self-driving to its cars with an over-the-air software update is amazing. People might buy for the zero emissions but they stay for the ride.

[deleted]

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#323
post #198

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The aftermarket community for existing cars basically doesn't care about emissions --- one of the biggest attractions of an electric. You've clearly never been behind the wheel of a Tesla. Please go drive one. Emissions were literally the very last reason for buying the car for me.

Between the touch screen control screaming "Look! Cool! Future! Oh yeah we had to sacrifice tactile feedback and usability when driving while ignoring fifty years of safety research but Cool!", trying to be a fast car but only really good for 0-60 in a straight line (and literally incapable of doing five laps at Laguna Seca without overheating and going into limp home mode), no OBD-2 port as another poster pointed ou…

>can you please give us a rational reason except zero tailpipe emissions for buying a Model S over, say, a Mercedes S-class or a BMW 7-series?

Well, here in Australia, MB and BMW are ripping their customers off with prices nearly TRIPLE the US price. Tesla has priced their Model S similarly to US. So yet another reason, to add to the excellent list already posted, is the better pricing.

On top of that, I have no idea why you think Teslas lack tactile feedback (or at least are worse than BMW 7s), are only good in straight line speed, or have headspace problems in the back if you are 5'8".

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#324

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Of the handful of people I know that have bought Tesla's, they are very much not of the hacking mindset. I'm not saying this is forever true, but I think the type of person that can actually afford one usually has the "premium" and "executive" mindsets (if I can makeup some terms). That is, they'd rather pay extra for 98% of everything they want and not have the worry of needing to get their hands dirty (the premium…

Silicon Valley is full of them. While I haven't met one of the owner, I'd be surprised if there weren't some who still had the hacker mindset.

There are certainly software hackers who are not interested in hacking mechanical devices, working on cars, or even understanding them. I'm not one, but most of the other software devs I know are. Their cluelessness about how cars work is almost funny.

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#325
post #273

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Between the touch screen control screaming "Look! Cool! Future! Oh yeah we had to sacrifice tactile feedback and usability when driving while ignoring fifty years of safety research but Cool!", trying to be a fast car but only really good for 0-60 in a straight line (and literally incapable of doing five laps at Laguna Seca without overheating and going into limp home mode), no OBD-2 port as another poster pointed ou…

> Oh yeah we had to sacrifice tactile feedback Nonsense. You need tactile feedback while driving. You will not be using the center console while driving. You will not even be looking at it. All of the stuff you need while driving is tactile. > trying to be a fast car but only really good for 0-60 in a straight line LOL. I sense hurt feelings. > no OBD-2 port as another poster pointed out Why would it need an OBD-2 po…

> 5. American designed, American built, no $$$ going to questionable oil interests.

I don't see what that has to do with America, except for 'Murica f'yeah

> 7. Over-The-Air software updates that actually add useful features. No, I don't need to go to the service center to update my software. LOL!

ROFL

> 8. It drives itself? Autopilot! Nice!

Don't many cars have that to the limited degree already allowed by law?

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#326

I don't think things are as dire as he makes it out: 1. Small amount of cars on the road so there's limited incentive for aftermarket parts. 2. People already do brakes/tires/suspension/etc. It's a car after all. 3. I wouldn't want to get near the powertrain. 425kw(~400V @ 1,000 Amps) will kill you if you touch something that you shouldn't. I think it'll be a bigger issue once we see the Model 3 on the road.

Your computer power supply has a ~400 volt rail in it. Are you unwilling to ever open a desktop computer? The Tesla battery has contactors inside of it, so you'll only have 400V live when the car is on. Additionally, assuming the HV is floating relative to the chassis, you need to touch two spots at different potentials to actually get shocked. That said, it looks like this is an attempt to prevent service of a lot o…

> Your computer power supply has a ~400 volt rail in it. Are you unwilling to ever open a desktop computer?

If it's plugged in and turned on - yeah, sure, I don't want to muck around in there. The thing is, my computer power supply:

* Can be completely physically disconnected from the rest of the computer

* Doesn't have a battery in it

If I pull the plug on my desktop, disconnect the power supply, and maybe if I'm being really paranoid touch a lamp to it just to be sure there isn't anything trapped in a cap or inductor, I know that that 400 volt rail is actually at zero volts relative to anything near me. Batteries? Especially power batteries that I can't guarantee are physically disconnected, and that can't really be grounded because they're inside an insulated mobile platform? It's more like looking inside a microwave oven or a CRT, and you're damn right that I don't open those up.

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#327
post #47

Great article, very forward looking and constructive criticism. Tesla is a young company with Silicon Valley ethos, it does not surprise me, they are treating Cars like Software. Where you are licensed to use software but do not own it and how that world view may or may not work. I am just wondering since Volt is from Old guard, its chances are better because the maintainability is a bit more traditional (but not all…

they are treating Cars like Software. Where you are licensed to use software but do not own it

Why do they sell the cars at all then? Why not just lease them?

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#328
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

@20.8 mpg city when new that's 10,000 gallons of fuel for 200k miles or ~30,000$ while gas is cheap. A Tesla model 3 (To Be Unveiled March 31st) is 35,000$, costs far less (~1/10th) for fuel, and is not 22 years old. That's why people care about electric cars.

10k gallons costs you $18,000 or less right now "while gas is cheap" - for a TCO of $20,000 in 20 years (plus cheap-ish repairs) - and you are driving a Merc. The model 3 (once you can actually get hold of it) will cost you $35,000 up front, plus about $7,000 in electricity for 200k miles at prices of 13-15c/kWh, plus about two battery replacements - battery lifetime is 8 years or 125k miles - at $10,000ish a pop - f…

[deleted]

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#329
post #250

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Your computer power supply has a ~400 volt rail in it. Are you unwilling to ever open a desktop computer?" Not at 1000 amps, it doesn't ...

Right, but how many amps are flowing through a wire isn't going to change how badly it electrocutes you.

Actually, it's other way around - amps matter a great deal.

400 volts with low amps feels like a sting. I've touched 25K volt contact once (by mistake), while unpleasant (and some damaged skin), managed just fine - cause very low amps.

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#330

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ah, another youngster who didn't hear the one about the IBM mainframe upgrades done by moving a jumper. P.S. it's kind of funny that people who make a living from the sale of goods with zero marginal production cost (i.e. additional copies of a program) get weirded out by "pay-by-value" from hardware manufacturers ...

There is a diesel generator company that makes semi-truck sized mobile generators for backup purposes/remote locations. The difference between the cheap vs expensive variants is around $250,000. They only difference is the cheap one has software to limit the output. Now if you could hack that you could save yourself quarter of a mil.

> if you could hack that you could save yourself quarter of a mil.

Pikers. Sneak in there a hidden octa-core Xeon server running ... ah ... 'cloned' Oracle licences, and that's probably a cool million.

Post reply on HN