This actually makes me rethink George Lucas as being brilliant rather than stupid. It's also re-written the entire Star Wars saga in my mind for the remainder of my life.
No. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxKtZmQgxrI
Reconsidering Star Wars IV in the light of I-III
11–20 of 48 posts
Re: Reconsidering Star Wars IV in the light of I-III
#12This actually makes me rethink George Lucas as being brilliant rather than stupid. It's also re-written the entire Star Wars saga in my mind for the remainder of my life.
Re: Reconsidering Star Wars IV in the light of I-III
#13Re: Reconsidering Star Wars IV in the light of I-III
#14Here's my question: how did Luke end up stuck slogging in the desert with his grouchy uncle while his twin sister got to grow up a princess on a beautiful world?
Obviously, Obi-wan went easier on the boy.
Re: Reconsidering Star Wars IV in the light of I-III
#15This actually makes me rethink George Lucas as being brilliant rather than stupid. It's also re-written the entire Star Wars saga in my mind for the remainder of my life.
I seriously doubt Lucas actually intended any of this. Rather, having R2-D2, C3-PO and Chewie all over the prequels was mostly fan-service, and this is an elaborate retcon ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retroactive_continuity ).
Re: Reconsidering Star Wars IV in the light of I-III
#16Here's my question: how did Luke end up stuck slogging in the desert with his grouchy uncle while his twin sister got to grow up a princess on a beautiful world?
I know. It's no fair that Luke got a quiet, peaceful childhood, spending all his time tinkering with his Land Speeder, shooting swamp rats, and daydreaming about adventuring through the Galaxy, while his sister had to grow up in a stifling, controlling, political environment where her every word, action, and appearance were constantly monitored giving her very little freedom or privacy. Obviously, Obi-wan went easier…
Re: Reconsidering Star Wars IV in the light of I-III
#17Here's my question: how did Luke end up stuck slogging in the desert with his grouchy uncle while his twin sister got to grow up a princess on a beautiful world?
I know. It's no fair that Luke got a quiet, peaceful childhood, spending all his time tinkering with his Land Speeder, shooting swamp rats, and daydreaming about adventuring through the Galaxy, while his sister had to grow up in a stifling, controlling, political environment where her every word, action, and appearance were constantly monitored giving her very little freedom or privacy. Obviously, Obi-wan went easier…
Re: Reconsidering Star Wars IV in the light of I-III
#18Leia specifically says "I have placed information vital to the survival of the Rebellion into the memory systems of this R2 unit." So, the interpretation of R2-D2's role at the beginning seems spurious.
This theme is/was meant to come in part VII-IX.
I read this on Slashdot.
At the end of VI the death star is destroyed, but whoever can take control of the storm troopers on the remaining imperial starships is a force to be reckoned with.
Re: Reconsidering Star Wars IV in the light of I-III
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
I know. It's no fair that Luke got a quiet, peaceful childhood, spending all his time tinkering with his Land Speeder, shooting swamp rats, and daydreaming about adventuring through the Galaxy, while his sister had to grow up in a stifling, controlling, political environment where her every word, action, and appearance were constantly monitored giving her very little freedom or privacy. Obviously, Obi-wan went easier…
This has to be one of the best exchanges I have ever seen. I don't think I have laughed that hard in quite a long time.
Re: Reconsidering Star Wars IV in the light of I-III
#20This actually makes me rethink George Lucas as being brilliant rather than stupid. It's also re-written the entire Star Wars saga in my mind for the remainder of my life.
No. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxKtZmQgxrI