Live data from Hacker News

Reconsidering Star Wars IV in the light of I-III

morningstar.nildram.co.uk

11–20 of 48 posts

Re: Reconsidering Star Wars IV in the light of I-III

#11
post #5

This actually makes me rethink George Lucas as being brilliant rather than stupid. It's also re-written the entire Star Wars saga in my mind for the remainder of my life.

No. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxKtZmQgxrI

Oh... I was hoping that was a link to "George Lucas in Love"

Re: Reconsidering Star Wars IV in the light of I-III

#12
post #5

This actually makes me rethink George Lucas as being brilliant rather than stupid. It's also re-written the entire Star Wars saga in my mind for the remainder of my life.

I seriously doubt Lucas actually intended any of this. Rather, having R2-D2, C3-PO and Chewie all over the prequels was mostly fan-service, and this is an elaborate retcon (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retroactive_continuity).

Re: Reconsidering Star Wars IV in the light of I-III

#14

Here's my question: how did Luke end up stuck slogging in the desert with his grouchy uncle while his twin sister got to grow up a princess on a beautiful world?

I know. It's no fair that Luke got a quiet, peaceful childhood, spending all his time tinkering with his Land Speeder, shooting swamp rats, and daydreaming about adventuring through the Galaxy, while his sister had to grow up in a stifling, controlling, political environment where her every word, action, and appearance were constantly monitored giving her very little freedom or privacy.

Obviously, Obi-wan went easier on the boy.

Re: Reconsidering Star Wars IV in the light of I-III

#15
post #12
post #5

This actually makes me rethink George Lucas as being brilliant rather than stupid. It's also re-written the entire Star Wars saga in my mind for the remainder of my life.

I seriously doubt Lucas actually intended any of this. Rather, having R2-D2, C3-PO and Chewie all over the prequels was mostly fan-service, and this is an elaborate retcon ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retroactive_continuity ).

Even if it was intended, it doesn't change the fact that Episodes 1-3 were terrible films.

Re: Reconsidering Star Wars IV in the light of I-III

#16

Here's my question: how did Luke end up stuck slogging in the desert with his grouchy uncle while his twin sister got to grow up a princess on a beautiful world?

I know. It's no fair that Luke got a quiet, peaceful childhood, spending all his time tinkering with his Land Speeder, shooting swamp rats, and daydreaming about adventuring through the Galaxy, while his sister had to grow up in a stifling, controlling, political environment where her every word, action, and appearance were constantly monitored giving her very little freedom or privacy. Obviously, Obi-wan went easier…

Well played, sir.

Re: Reconsidering Star Wars IV in the light of I-III

#17

Here's my question: how did Luke end up stuck slogging in the desert with his grouchy uncle while his twin sister got to grow up a princess on a beautiful world?

I know. It's no fair that Luke got a quiet, peaceful childhood, spending all his time tinkering with his Land Speeder, shooting swamp rats, and daydreaming about adventuring through the Galaxy, while his sister had to grow up in a stifling, controlling, political environment where her every word, action, and appearance were constantly monitored giving her very little freedom or privacy. Obviously, Obi-wan went easier…

This has to be one of the best exchanges I have ever seen. I don't think I have laughed that hard in quite a long time.

Re: Reconsidering Star Wars IV in the light of I-III

#18
post #6

Leia specifically says "I have placed information vital to the survival of the Rebellion into the memory systems of this R2 unit." So, the interpretation of R2-D2's role at the beginning seems spurious.

Apparently he carries codes to change the alliances of the storm troopers (in addition to the plans of the death star, I suppose), who in III turned on the Jedi.

This theme is/was meant to come in part VII-IX.

I read this on Slashdot.

At the end of VI the death star is destroyed, but whoever can take control of the storm troopers on the remaining imperial starships is a force to be reckoned with.

Re: Reconsidering Star Wars IV in the light of I-III

#19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I know. It's no fair that Luke got a quiet, peaceful childhood, spending all his time tinkering with his Land Speeder, shooting swamp rats, and daydreaming about adventuring through the Galaxy, while his sister had to grow up in a stifling, controlling, political environment where her every word, action, and appearance were constantly monitored giving her very little freedom or privacy. Obviously, Obi-wan went easier…

This has to be one of the best exchanges I have ever seen. I don't think I have laughed that hard in quite a long time.

[deleted]

Re: Reconsidering Star Wars IV in the light of I-III

#20
post #5

This actually makes me rethink George Lucas as being brilliant rather than stupid. It's also re-written the entire Star Wars saga in my mind for the remainder of my life.

No. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxKtZmQgxrI

Thank you so much for linking the Phantom Menace reviews. That guys proves that Lucas is an idiot more than anything else I've seen.
Post reply on HN