Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — uselessdguy

uselessdguy

HN member
Joined
Sun, Sep 21, 2014, 8:23 PM UTC
HN karma
324
Public activity
36 items

About uselessdguy

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #8673005

    Yes. 1.5, if my mind serves correctly. Later on, LSB tried to do something similar for sysvinit using initscript headers that were interpreted by an external insserv program, but t…

  2. comment
    Comment #8672851

    This is a disingenuous presentation, though I would not expect any different from a systemd proponent, or opponent, for that matter. I wrote about the follies of systemd debates he…

  3. comment
    Comment #8672792

    I don't think anyone really considers sysvinit to "follow Unix". In fact, I'd say sysvinit is more of a historical accident than anything. An actual example of a service manager th…

  4. comment
    Comment #8616739

    Slackware, Gentoo/Funtoo, CRUX, PCLinuxOS and all its derivatives. Then some more niche ones like Alpine Linux (which also eschews a lot of the GNU base system for alternatives) an…

  5. comment
    Comment #8616725

    My personal experience is that BSD people by and large care about Linux mostly out of necessity, but nonetheless they're still knowledgeable about both. Mostly they're angry whenev…

  6. comment
    Comment #8616531

    A lot of people conveniently ignore that the shirt was actually made by a female friend of his named Elly Prizeman. The situation all of a sudden becomes completely different when …

  7. comment
    Comment #8616523

    That's three Debian maintainers in a single week. Wow.

  8. comment
    Comment #8616354

    But then by this logic, OpenBSD should also be a dysfunctional mess. It's not. It has almost the same number of contributors per 6-month release cycle that systemd alone gets in on…

  9. comment
    Comment #8616294

    I completely condemn such nonsense as a bunch of vitriolic people driving a distribution maintainer away from their position all because of their indirect affiliation with a contro…

  10. comment
    Comment #8504031

    You can run uselessd with or without being PID1. The two modes have different implications, obviously. The latter choice will mean a separation of system manager and service manage…

  11. comment
    Comment #8503849

    Humorous names aren't exactly new to free software.

  12. comment
    Comment #8503769

    ANTINEWS is the best kind of NEWS. And you don't just lose things, come on. Our recent support for running a system instance of systemd/uselessd without taking over init (as early …

  13. comment
    Comment #8503582

    Off the top of my head: __compar_fn_t (just a typedef), strndupa(), parse_printf_format(), canonicalize_file_name(), the GLOB_BRACE flag, implicitly included headers, error.h (also…

  14. comment
    Comment #8503541

    That's a Linux kernel feature, not a systemd feature. It's unrelated: http://www.linux.com/news/featured-blogs/200-libby-clark/773... systemd has libqrencode integration, in order …

  15. comment
    Comment #8503524

    The name is perfect and I do not see myself changing it. The fact that so many people misunderstand makes it better. The Linux Action Show thought we were calling systemd "useless"…

  16. comment
    Comment #8489028

    No, I specifically addressed this: -------------------------------- "The rather huge scope and opinionated nature of systemd leads to people yearning for the days of sysvinit. A lo…

  17. comment
    Comment #8488788

    Because they all largely did the same things that sysv did with a few bolt-on features. That is a total misrepresentation, I'm sorry. The fact is SysV was probably one of the weake…

  18. comment
    Comment #8488549

    Shell scripting isn't "archaic nonsense" at all, it's just that the warts from how most shells implement their command language (ksh/bash/POSIX sh) are holding us back. If you go l…

  19. comment
    Comment #8488434

    I kind of stitched this essay together haphazardly, and it certainly does require some background knowledge to fully understand. Nonetheless, "the udev debacle" refers to systemd m…

  20. story
  21. comment
    Comment #8375469

    First of all, thanks for linking to uselessd. The writeup was quite nice. I was actually in the process of writing my own notes to respond to Poettering's "The Biggest Myths", but …

  22. comment
    Comment #8375450

    It's obvious you didn't even read the article. EDIT: I don't know the motivation for the downvotes. I replied like this because the commenter posted a canned cookie-cutter reply th…

  23. comment
    Comment #8355686

    The "new better init system" already exists. Several of them, in fact. The only difference? They have no intention of engaging in any shady realpolitik, or consolidating functional…

  24. comment
    Comment #8355647

    Hey, Rich. First of all, thanks for musl libc. At the moment, yes. We do keep much of the internal systemd architecture in tact, but we do eventually aim on partially decoupling it…

  25. comment
    Comment #8355615

    Except that Lennart Poettering (at the least) was directly involved in negotiating the dependency on systemd's libraries for the GNOME stack: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/deskto…