Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — maxignol

maxignol

HN member
Joined
Wed, Oct 15, 2025, 9:16 PM UTC
HN karma
14
Public activity
32 items

About maxignol

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49100408

    Is the model picked through the router only for the first user turn or is there multi-turn routing (or planned to be added) ?

  2. comment
    Comment #49099595

    I'm really excited about what's been happening couple last weeks for local inference. I feel like it all started after colibri [1] was released. Great work ! Anyone got recommendat…

  3. comment
    Comment #49067434

    I dont quite understand why GGUF is better optimized. Are the performances better for the same amount of VRAM ?

  4. comment
    Comment #49008749

    > I’d suspect the harness to massively affect token use and optimisation Yes they do according to databricks -> https://www.databricks.com/blog/benchmarking-coding-agents-d... That…

  5. comment
    Comment #49008633

    What is your harness with every model ?

  6. comment
    Comment #49008613

    > my use cases stop aligning to swebench pro around 50% accuracy, and more closely align with DeepSWE. What do you mean by that ? If the model is higher than 50% on swebench pro th…

  7. comment
    Comment #48966724

    Shouldn’t we fear they start doing only close source like most us labs once they catch up in market shares ?

  8. comment
    Comment #48950345

    Well, I had not heard of RLM before, just read the paper, thank you for introducing me to your lazy version !

  9. comment
    Comment #48945014

    I’ve never seen the Id approach before, that’s a good idea ! Though I was wondering how do you manage to keep costs low within the 7 agents ?

  10. comment
    Comment #48931407

    Giving the accuracy-token graph and not the accuracy-cost graph, thus we cannot easily compare costs with other models, is not a way to gain my trust

  11. comment
    Comment #48857672

    I’m truly impressed by your work ! I don’t know if this is planned for near future, but how about adding energy efficiency benchmarks ? Because running locally is a great feeling, …

  12. comment
    Comment #48823518

    Well, had a meeting with a VC that literally brought his note taking 3rd person to the meeting, did not even say hello. Tbh, I still find it creepier than an AI transcriber.

  13. comment
    Comment #48792082

    This seems really bad…

  14. comment
    Comment #48792045

    I guess the technology used here must be ground-breaking lol

  15. comment
    Comment #48779287

    Did not seem to find how much tokens per second he achieved with this setup ?

  16. comment
    Comment #48771649

    Thus the prices in switzerland are higher than anywhere else. I don’t know about you, but I’d have no use of 25gbits/s

  17. comment
    Comment #48718702

    Lol next time I’ll just apply with 4 accounts and maybe get in once.

  18. comment
    Comment #48715931

    Are many people using HackerRank ATS ?

  19. comment
    Comment #48715887

    Have you tried opencode go ?

  20. comment
    Comment #48715873

    Would you recommand some ressources about how multiple neural engines are used in data centers ?

  21. comment
    Comment #48676955

    I guess it was inevitable. Is it only RAM related ?

  22. comment
    Comment #48676903

    Funny one x) Though I ain’t sure if even more data is useful on hackernews

  23. comment
    Comment #48656083

    Great way to honor Tony and his work

  24. comment
    Comment #48656017

    In the end, sorting prs and vulnerabilities has been the same for open source maintainers. How about adding a credibility score to every github account ? Couldn’t that cut sorting …

  25. comment
    Comment #48642076

    3B param on par with opus 4.5 sounds interesting. Will read the full article before making my mind