Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: I made Google Trends for Hacker News by indexing 18 years of comments

hackernewstrends.com

121–130 of 169 posts

Re: Show HN: I made Google Trends for Hacker News by indexing 18 years of comments

#122

Earlier quoted context omitted.

yes, and per HN terms and conditions only YC and YC affiliated (as you quoted) can use the api legally. I don't license my content to anyone else and so it shouldn't be use by anyone else, even if it's available on a free-for-all API (nice move HN, btw).

https://github.com/HackerNews/API/blob/master/LICENSE It's right there, you just have to click the link I shared ...

that's the license for the API, not the content/data the API serves

Re: Show HN: I made Google Trends for Hacker News by indexing 18 years of comments

#123
First great work.

Reminds that I wish there was a modern way to do this for the words people speak and write online with. I want to literally know when people started putting literally twice in sentences.

Ngram seems is out of date a piece meal. Now Corpus seems like they try but UX terrible.

Re: Show HN: I made Google Trends for Hacker News by indexing 18 years of comments

#124

Earlier quoted context omitted.

By uploading any User Content you hereby grant and will grant Y Combinator and its affiliated companies a nonexclusive, worldwide, royalty free, fully paid up, transferable, sublicensable, perpetual, irrevocable license to copy, display, upload, perform, distribute, store, modify and otherwise use your User Content for any Y Combinator-related purpose in any form, medium or technology now known or later developed. @z…

>Y Combinator and its affiliated companies is zX41ZdbW either?

[dead]

Re: Show HN: I made Google Trends for Hacker News by indexing 18 years of comments

#127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You might want to read it again, then: https://opensource.org/license/mit

That is about the software, not the data.

While a literal reading of the MIT license refers to "software", many datasets have been released under it.

In particular, if someone releases something that is only a dataset along with an MIT license file, the most reasonable interpretation is that the rights holder intended to release the data under the terms of that license.

I looked for copyright cases involving this specific distinction, whether "data" versus "software" makes a legal difference, but didn’t find anything.

So the question remains open (for you, for me it's pretty clear the dataset is released under MIT).

You might want to sue and find out. It sounds like an interesting experiment.

Re: Show HN: I made Google Trends for Hacker News by indexing 18 years of comments

#129

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://github.com/HackerNews/API/blob/master/LICENSE It's right there, you just have to click the link I shared ...

that's the license for the API, not the content/data the API serves

>including without limitation the rights to use

'use'...arguably the sole purpose of the API is to fetch the data.

You are grasping at straws.

Post reply on HN