Viewing profile — hunter2_
hunter2_
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Nov 06, 2014, 3:40 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 3,615
- Public activity
- 1,964 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About hunter2_
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49076669
At least nobody has figured out my password yet.
-
comment
Comment #49076563
I just had this happen, and this HN post was the first result when searching "what is discover.aigc" on google. The specific Discover Feed entry that led me to see this domain (wit…
-
comment
Comment #48867335
> just read an extra second [...] accidentally trigger watchdogs Well, this seems to touch heavily on the concern: if your job normally takes 0.1s and costs $100, it could accident…
-
comment
Comment #48752950
Yes, but a mitigation suggestion like "keep using it, except don't do X specific sequence" (for example, send to a Yahoo address via the Reply button, or whatever the case may be) …
-
comment
Comment #48750304
As someone who doesn't rely on this feature, I'd love to know now as well, but perhaps the etiquette in public would be to align ourselves with: > we will not discuss or disclose t…
-
comment
Comment #48695440
I fully understand you, but then, copying copyrighted data can't be piracy (because literal piracy is stealing).
-
comment
Comment #48695303
When you're already going 10 mph and you're about to add another 10 mph, you can only "call that zero" (i.e., go from 0 mph to 10 mph again) if your point of reference (i.e., the g…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48695027
That's a good question, and I suppose the mgh formula isn't a suitable answer, so my answer would be something like: if you lift an object to some height, and then you repeat that …
-
comment
Comment #48695006
Brilliant. For those wanting more numbers [0], the ball on the 10ft ladder hits the ground at (I'll stick with imperial units) 17.296 MPH, the ball on the 20ft ladder hits the grou…
-
comment
Comment #48653202
I'll admit, many maneuvers can be described as cutting someone off. One so crazy that it would likely cause a collision should never be performed, but I was talking about the low-s…
-
comment
Comment #48653073
Indeed, the extremely minor inconvenience of creating a gap in that scenario is very common even in the northeast US. It's the other half of the spectrum, where it's a more severe …
-
comment
Comment #48652994
> I wouldn't turn on my signal until after they had passed. If I did it before they pass, they might think my intent is to merge in front of them, and slam on their brakes This is …
-
comment
Comment #48640429
> Also really strange to me to be prioritizing fuel economy over safety. If I see that someone is actually changing lanes (in terms of lateral position changing within their lane) …
-
comment
Comment #48640230
> How do you handle an upcoming left turn (assuming right hand driving) during heavy traffic? If I am in the middle lane (lane 2), and I realize I need to get into the leftmost lan…
-
comment
Comment #48638652
As a northeasterner, I can explain: In some other places, a turn signal before a lane change is an ask, to which others respond by creating more of a gap than there originally was.…
-
comment
Comment #48380289
It's not the "where" but the "that you link" which is ironic: referring to it by the https:// scheme turns it into a link (a fundamental aspect of www); a scheme like ssh:// or git…
-
comment
Comment #48375671
Presumably that's to keep hardware sales up, e-waste be damned. You won't notice it taking 8 times longer when you have 8 times as many cores, or whatever.
-
comment
Comment #48352686
You would know which one is the desired one because only the desired one would be in pairing mode at that moment. Obviously a collision (if I can say that word) is possible, but un…
-
comment
Comment #48352644
Not being able to ignore the speech/writing/transmission of a passenger is reasonable. Not being able to ignore the speech/writing/transmission of the manufacturer of a device on t…
-
comment
Comment #48352574
Right, those other people (well, their devices) are asking you (well, your device) what your (device's) name is. You're not telling them until they ask. They need to leave you alon…
-
comment
Comment #48333072
Isn't it 2/3 of a gallon plus any cold start inefficiency? But either way your point stands.
-
comment
Comment #48320681
I can imagine an evolution like: 1. Introduce passwords 2. Introduce email-based reset flow 3. Introduce 2FA (optional) 4. Someone says "take the password reset flow, trigger it au…
-
comment
Comment #48320630
I had been thinking someone with a similar address made a typo. But now I'm thinking Microsoft already considers this a known incident depending on whether a bazillion attempts wer…
-
comment
Comment #48320539
If someone texts me something that's not interesting to those MITMs but is sensitive to mom catching a glance while my phone is on the table, that's a problem this toggle creates/d…