Viewing profile — CrisMystik
CrisMystik
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Mar 16, 2022, 6:48 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 29
- Public activity
- 19 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About CrisMystik
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49047255
Is it too much to ask to consider that the people on the banknotes are/will be depicted because they are European, and not because they come from any member State in particular?
-
comment
Comment #49047152
The underpinning ideology is that Europe (meaning the EU) should have no history, no culture and no identity because they are monopoly of the member States/nations. And, as always,…
-
comment
Comment #48859753
Yes, it was the second reading; because of that, the motion for rejecting the Council common position was not approved, since it received a majority, but not an absolute majority, …
-
comment
Comment #48853186
The new reading will happen if the Council rejects the amendment approved by the Parliament. When it does they have 6 weeks to negotiate, and then 6 weeks to approve the result of …
-
comment
Comment #48845815
One thing that should be noted is that, since the Parliament has been able to approve an amendment by absolute majority (which explicitly excludes E2E chats), the procedure is not …
-
comment
Comment #48845563
The urgency procedure is not the issue here, the problem is that this was Parliament's second reading, and the treaties (article 294 TFEU) say: > Second reading > 7. If, within thr…
-
comment
Comment #48845516
The urgency procedure has nothing to do with the absolute majority requirement. It's necessary because, in the second reading, the Parliament should have an absolute majority to re…
-
comment
Comment #48834322
The Parliament has many committees that do exactly what you're saying, while the Council meets in various configurations of national ministers depending on the law being voted on
-
comment
Comment #48825620
The first sentence is correct, but > The Council decided Chat Control was on the agenda The Council is different from the European Council (yes, the treaty drafters were not much c…
-
comment
Comment #48819738
MEPs are directly elected by citizens, not governments. It's the Council instead where representatives (ministers) of all national governments sit
-
comment
Comment #48807003
The ordinary legislative procedure applies to both: - Chat Control 1.0 (now expired): https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A... - Chat Control 2.0: https://eu…
-
comment
Comment #48804138
This is completely wrong. Under the ordinary legislative procedure (used for Chat Control 1.0 & 2.0) the Commission proposes an act, then the Council and Parliament can approve it,…
-
comment
Comment #48796051
In that case you're against the people currently in government, not the body itself, i.e. some people against Chat Control ask for the dissolution of the EU, but would they ask for…
-
comment
Comment #48796008
> the head of the EC, Ursula, is impossible to dethrone by the people via democratic vote or protest The Commission can be dismissed by the Parliament, with a majority of its membe…
-
comment
Comment #47947806
It's not as complete as the compiler proposed by this article, but there is a tool for Italian laws which can, among other things, recognize (parse) and apply amendments: https://i…
-
comment
Comment #38717507
I use Bird in Rome and it's the operator whose scooters I see the most around. However, it could also be due to the fact that the municipality has enacted strict rules allowing onl…
-
comment
Comment #38009428
> The other 26 are selected by the Council of Ministers, without Parliamentary oversight. No, after the European Parliament has approved the proposed President of the European Comm…
-
comment
Comment #36470823
What's the problem with the Lisbon Treaty?
-
comment
Comment #35099215
In my country, Italy, all online public services already must accept government-issued digital IDs only, by law. They come in two forms: SPID (which is just username and password +…