Live data from Hacker News

Is that ship still stuck?

istheshipstillstuck.com

961–970 of 1001 posts

Re: Is that ship still stuck?

#961
post #829
post #164

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People think I'm joking but we should bomb it to smithereens. The crater would probably just fill up with the water flow.

Oregon tried that with a dead beached whale 50 years ago. Results hilarious: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6CLumsir34

Not enough bomb :[

Re: Is that ship still stuck?

#962

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Interesting project. WOndering if you could write a blog about building that site.

I could, though it would be summarised in about one sentence: "NextJS and Vercel make everything stupidly easy."

haha thanks man!

Re: Is that ship still stuck?

#963

Fun facts: 1. The owner is Japanese 2. The operator is Taiwanese 3. The flag is Panamanian 4. The cargo is Chinese 5. The insurer is British 6. The crew is Indian 7. The canal is Egyptian and was built with forced labor by the French 8. The dredgers/salvage op managers are Dutch

> The flag is Panamanian That's an interesting way to say tax evasion.

Try telling Panama they don't have a right to create their own tax laws. If they want to incentivize ships to register in their country, they're a sovereign nation and can do that.

Re: Is that ship still stuck?

#964
post #39

I don't think people are giving enough credit to how stuck the ship is. Look at some of the photos of the front of it. Look at how far out of the water it is sitting. The ship might look like that if it were totally empty, but not when it is full of containers like this. Some people saying: just drag it off of the sand. Okay! And what happens when that causes you to rip a hole into the hull of the ship? Now it's real…

In an emergency situation like this: could they not use helicopters to lift containers off of the ship and just stack them next to the canal until they've freed the ship?

Seems pretty quick to setup and do assuming there are helicopters that can move that weight.

Re: Is that ship still stuck?

#965

Comedy option, what wacky cold war era aircraft do we have capable of lifting massive loads like a container ship? Perhaps an enormous fleet of Chinook helicopters could take it straight up?

Just use the Philadelphia Experiment technology to teleport it to another dimension

Now that's an idea I can get behind, but unfortunately, the guy with classification authority over that material didn't write down where it was eventually stored...

In fact we can't find him anywhere...

Re: Is that ship still stuck?

#966
post #39

I don't think people are giving enough credit to how stuck the ship is. Look at some of the photos of the front of it. Look at how far out of the water it is sitting. The ship might look like that if it were totally empty, but not when it is full of containers like this. Some people saying: just drag it off of the sand. Okay! And what happens when that causes you to rip a hole into the hull of the ship? Now it's real…

In an emergency situation like this: could they not use helicopters to lift containers off of the ship and just stack them next to the canal until they've freed the ship? Seems pretty quick to setup and do assuming there are helicopters that can move that weight.

Containers are 2 (20ft) or 4 (40ft) tonnes (roughly) unloaded.

And they can (if I remember right) contain 20 tonnes or so, of cargo.

Our current chinooks can handle 10 tonnes, and the old models could carry 4, if I recall.

And probably less in desert heat.

So helicopters will not be moving any containers

Re: Is that ship still stuck?

#967
post #546

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you unload 20,000 TEU's onto rail cars it takes 5000 cars, double-stacked. That's 50 100-car trains. It'll take weeks to months to load and unload all that, if a proper rail depot is available to take it. It takes huge cranes to reach across a megaship and into its hold. That'd have to be build. On sand. The idea that there's any quick way to manage the cargo of this ship is whistling in the dark.

Why do they need to be put on rail cars ? Unload them onto the sand next to the canal.

After you hit the limit of the crane reach, where does the next one go? Stacking on unstable sand seems a bad choice. So maybe 10% can be unloaded and just set on the ground. After that, they have to be moved somewhere.

Re: Is that ship still stuck?

#969
post #416

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>You're basically asking to build a port in the middle of the egyptian desert. No. Helicopters. 10 helis, 1 container/sortie, 10 sorties/hour = 10000 containers in 5 days.

You can't possibly have 10 helis safely unloading cargo at once from a single ship, that'd be an invitation for disaster. Also, doing that in the dark would simply not work. 10 sorties/hour is also unrealistic; with proper cranes and infrastructure at port it would take something like 10 minutes, with choppers it would take more time. IMHO if helis would even work (which is debatable and debated here), the optimistic…

>You can't possibly have 10 helis safely unloading cargo at once from a single ship

5 loading at a time, while the other 5 unloading on the ground - plenty of space as ship is 1300 feet long.

> doing that in the dark would simply not work

you flood the ship and the space around with light. Almost 30 years ago we did a night ship unload at an unprepared location - no issues.

>10 sorties/hour is also unrealistic

doing it with crane we did about 15+ - we weren't union operation though - we were paid for performance, not time :) and being young we were moving fast. With chopper not much different if weather is ok.

Post reply on HN