Earlier quoted context omitted.
This. Just had friends visiting. Their teenage son had had his wisdom tooth pulled last week. Dentist had then given him (as a standard practice?) prescription for Ibuprofen (800mg tabs?) AND some opioid based pain killer! Needless to say, latter they said went directly to trash after they realized what it contained and for ibuprofen they halved the dosage. To me and his parents this was pain management gone way over…
Move to Europe where we don't get as many drugs prescribed? I think the only time you get opioids is after major surgery. Personally I don't know anybody who had to take them.
Ibuprofen alters human testicular physiology to produce compensated hypogonadism
91–100 of 251 posts
Re: Ibuprofen alters human testicular physiology to produce compensated hypogonadism
#92600mg per day is an enormous dose, albeit not especially uncommon. I’d be more interested though in the effects of, say, 200 - 400mg per week.
Clearly you have never been in the USMC. In hind sight it was pretty stupid but I have taken up to 1600mg per day for several days/ weeks in a row. We pretty much call the 800mg tablets grunt candy.
Re: Ibuprofen alters human testicular physiology to produce compensated hypogonadism
#93Earlier quoted context omitted.
This. Just had friends visiting. Their teenage son had had his wisdom tooth pulled last week. Dentist had then given him (as a standard practice?) prescription for Ibuprofen (800mg tabs?) AND some opioid based pain killer! Needless to say, latter they said went directly to trash after they realized what it contained and for ibuprofen they halved the dosage. To me and his parents this was pain management gone way over…
Move to Europe where we don't get as many drugs prescribed? I think the only time you get opioids is after major surgery. Personally I don't know anybody who had to take them.
Re: Ibuprofen alters human testicular physiology to produce compensated hypogonadism
#94Along with the high sustained dosage others have mentioned the small sample size (14 in the experimental group) should be noted.
This is worth reading: The "Unreliable Small-Sample" Misconception https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2008/11/9/656465/- > My point here is that arguing that the sample is inaccurate simply because of how large or small it is is not correct. The size of the sample actually makes very little difference in how applicable the results are to the population. It simply makes the range of possible results smaller as the size…
"studies with small sample sizes can be very valid."
They could be with a certain probability but (unless you believe in a very strong prior) you can't know with sufficient certainty.
Re: Ibuprofen alters human testicular physiology to produce compensated hypogonadism
#95Along with the high sustained dosage others have mentioned the small sample size (14 in the experimental group) should be noted.
This is worth reading: The "Unreliable Small-Sample" Misconception https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2008/11/9/656465/- > My point here is that arguing that the sample is inaccurate simply because of how large or small it is is not correct. The size of the sample actually makes very little difference in how applicable the results are to the population. It simply makes the range of possible results smaller as the size…
Re: Ibuprofen alters human testicular physiology to produce compensated hypogonadism
#96Along with the high sustained dosage others have mentioned the small sample size (14 in the experimental group) should be noted.
This is worth reading: The "Unreliable Small-Sample" Misconception https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2008/11/9/656465/- > My point here is that arguing that the sample is inaccurate simply because of how large or small it is is not correct. The size of the sample actually makes very little difference in how applicable the results are to the population. It simply makes the range of possible results smaller as the size…
In seriousness, this is a lazy claim when you could have actually addressed the study in question. Since you did not, I assume you have no supporting observations.
Re: Ibuprofen alters human testicular physiology to produce compensated hypogonadism
#97Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is worth reading: The "Unreliable Small-Sample" Misconception https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2008/11/9/656465/- > My point here is that arguing that the sample is inaccurate simply because of how large or small it is is not correct. The size of the sample actually makes very little difference in how applicable the results are to the population. It simply makes the range of possible results smaller as the size…
Sample size is related to the conclusions you can draw. If their goal is that ibuprofen has this effect, then 15 can be enough given the specific effects they are getting. If their goal is more complex, say that ibuprofen reduces fertility, that's be a lot harder if the effect wasn't massive and well reproduceable.
Using a ridiculous example "for a sample set of 10, the author found that exposure to fire causes burns" would hopefully not draw similar sampling concerns but as I don't know this subject matter deeply, I can't comment whether it is true for this case
Re: Ibuprofen alters human testicular physiology to produce compensated hypogonadism
#98Earlier quoted context omitted.
I get what you're saying, but ibuprofen and acetaminophen save lives. The problem is the western (American?) tendency to self-medicate and to over medicate with really potent stuff. That shouldn't be as normal as it is.
I am not aware of any common uses of Ibuprofen and Acetominophen that saves lives?
Re: Ibuprofen alters human testicular physiology to produce compensated hypogonadism
#99Along with the high sustained dosage others have mentioned the small sample size (14 in the experimental group) should be noted.
This is worth reading: The "Unreliable Small-Sample" Misconception https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2008/11/9/656465/- > My point here is that arguing that the sample is inaccurate simply because of how large or small it is is not correct. The size of the sample actually makes very little difference in how applicable the results are to the population. It simply makes the range of possible results smaller as the size…
Or, if you want to some it all up in a single graph: https://andrewgelman.com/2014/11/17/power-06-looks-like-get-... (although your experiments hopefully have power much greater than 0.06)
The gist of the point: If your sample size is small, significant results are likely to (sometimes vastly) overestimate the true effect size, and there is a non-negligible chance that the effect size is actually estimated in the wrong direction.
Re: Ibuprofen alters human testicular physiology to produce compensated hypogonadism
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
Clearly you have never been in the USMC. In hind sight it was pretty stupid but I have taken up to 1600mg per day for several days/ weeks in a row. We pretty much call the 800mg tablets grunt candy.
What is happening that gets everyone so inflamed? If you take a painkiller and go right back to the activity that damaged you you are begging for permanent injury.