Live data from Hacker News

Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky

theverge.com

711–720 of 855 posts

Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky

#711

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Mastodon was dead from the start, it isn’t in the running. Threads has too big of an image problem to overcome. No one wants Instagram for Twitter. Bluesky is the only platform currently that has a chance, but it’s an under funded, tiny team who can’t ship on time. Bluesky will see a surge in registrations but no change in DAU as they still haven’t supported video, so no one will stay on the site.

Why do you believe that about Mastodon?

Onboarding and discovery is much too difficult for the average user. Distributed is technologically cool, but will remain niche IMO.

Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky

#713
I think banning any network that allows citizens to air their views, whatever they may be, is very dangerous. Free speech that is free of control is essential.

I also think that anyone, especially someone prone to childish tantrums like Musk, having unquestionable control of a major network on which citizens can air their views, is also very dangerous. Free speech that is free of control is essential.

Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky

#714

That the tide turned against Musk when he undid the old Twitter censorship regime which was targeted towards primarily American conservatives. Since then, a lot of folks, including here and on major subreddits like news and politics, have openly wished harm on the site and on Musk. Here Musk was pushing back on illegal [1] censorship, and many people on this thread are celebrating the authoritarian judge responsible.…

[flagged]

Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky

#715

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What you describe is a flamewar maintenance algorithm. I mean, it COULD work if all people were sound and reasonable, but that's obviously not the case. And being a flamewar battleground is probably not the goal of most platform owners either. Also, for many topics that are not politics you don't need disagreement for a productive discussion.

> I mean, it COULD work if all people were sound and reasonable, but that's obviously not the case. But community notes works well. That's evidence that reasonableness emerges when you boost content that a diversity of people appreciate, regardless of whether people are sound and reasonable. > What you describe is a flamewar maintenance algorithm. Are you saying my idea will increase flamewars? I believe it should de…

Ok, now I get it, I got it wrong. Still questionable, but for other reason: niche content (like, retrocomputing or pet spider care or just about anything that's less agreeable than funny kittens) would never come thru.

Echo chambers aren't intrinsically bad, only when it's about politics and social issues - i. e. stuff that will affect everyone in the end.

Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky

#716
post #31

They will ban Bluesky too if it gets too popular .

Based on what evidence? IG, FB, WhatsApp, etc are all still running in Brazil last I checked.

They previously banned Telegram, and might come for these other services next. But selective enforcement is also part of how injustices are performed in authoritarian regimes. Note that most websites and businesses on the Internet don’t need to have a local representative in Brazil, for example, though the Supreme Court justice here demanded Twitter have one (just so he could jail the person like an act of theater). The aggressiveness against Twitter/X could just be a strategy to compel other companies to quietly censor in behalf of the current administration, even if it would be illegal for them to comply.

Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky

#717

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because X is not complying with the law in that country. Whether the law is right or not is irrelevant. You either comply or leave.

Brazilian here. We don't have rule of law here anymore. It's a covert dictatorship run at the front end by one judge, Alexandre de Moraes, and a small group of collaborators. He interprets the law however he wants or just outright ignores it in favor of ad hoc absurd interpretations, and there is no one left to judge the "supreme" judge. He effectively figures as accuser, defendant and judge in his own cases, which h…

I have been wondering why the current U.S. government is strongly against BRICS but supports Lula/Moraes.

On the surface it does not seem to make sense, apart from an emotional Bolsonaro==Trump==Bad argument.

I have watched Greenwald a couple of times on the Moraes topic, but never saw this addressed.

Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky

#718
post #466

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The linked documents describe the cartel and how it violated the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. It's not a difficult read.

Musk's lawyers "describing" something isn't evidence. Given Musk's personality, I would not be the tiniest bit surprised if he's suing without any actual evidence, just because he's angry and because he can. I mean, remember, this is the guy who tried to get out of buying Twitter, and then refused to pay out contractually-obligated packages to many of the former management team he fired. (I'm not the biggest fan in t…

Sorry, but I'm saddened by about how far people are willing to go to dislike Musk.

As far as I am concerned, his contributions to the US, society, and the future via Tesla, SpaceX, Neuralink, etc., dwarf his various foibles.

P.S. if the pay packages were contractually obligated, then the courts would have forced him to pay them. Courts are generally pretty biased in favor of employees when they sue their employer.

P.P.S if his case has no merit, the advertisers are hardly unable to defend themselves, they are huge corporations. You don't need to feel sorry for them.

Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky

#719

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To be honest with the current polarisation levels in politics it's no longer possible to be neutral. The conservative side is now even strongarming companies into abandoning their diversity programs! This is just really not ok, I'm part of the LGBTIQ+ support network in our company and this kind of thing is really making waves. People are worried, even though we're a Europe based company where this is not a contested…

> The conservative side is now even strongarming companies into abandoning their diversity programs! This is just really not ok, I'm part of the LGBTIQ+ support network in our company and this kind of thing is really making waves. Sorry pal, you're going to have to make it on merits, not your gender or skin color. > See what happened to Ford, Jack Daniels, Harley Davidson, and many others. Decades of progress are bei…

> Sorry pal, you're going to have to make it on merits, not your gender or skin color.

I'm not advocating for positive discrimination. Just no discrimination at all.

It's very important to have the proper procedures in place for when that does happen. That was part of the diversity programs. Programs against bullying, education for managers on gender identity and how to deal with the difficulties around them, how to pick up on bullying etc. It's this kind of thing that I do myself (not as a job but as a voluntary side assignment in my job). It's amazing what kind of sexism and racism you hear when you go on a company trip and have a few drinks with high-level managers. So clearly this work is still highly needed.

Don't forget these programs were started because things were going the wrong way, people who were different than the standard cishetero white male had less chance to a job and were making less money when they did get one. This is of course not acceptable.

I don't think quotas are the answer. But rather fines when a company goes too far askew. "We only hire white cristians here" just cannot be acceptable.

> Racial quotas in the workplace is not progress.

That was only one small part of the diversity programs, and not one I necessarily agree with.

> Oh, so your boycotts are fine? Classic leftist hypocrisy.

I never said boycotts are wrong anyway. If right wingers want to boycott companies like Apple, go ahead.

Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky

#720

I left Xitter about 6 weeks ago and went all in on Bluesky. Took time to give feedback to the algo, but it's doing much better these days. I don't feel like I'm missing out on much, you'll get the same news & events on Bluesky. A lot of people who were scared of losing their following are reporting more, better engagement with lower follower counts. What I really like about it is the ATProto, which while imperfect, s…

> What I really like about it is the ATProto… DID, etc Is the PLC DID (the one all bluesy accounts use) still hardcoded to a single centralised provider?

I don't think so, you can now run your own PDS with a limited number of users. There was a comment on another recent Bluesky HN story where someone reported that they offer instructions for doing his at sign up, iirc
Post reply on HN