Earlier quoted context omitted.
Mastodon was dead from the start, it isn’t in the running. Threads has too big of an image problem to overcome. No one wants Instagram for Twitter. Bluesky is the only platform currently that has a chance, but it’s an under funded, tiny team who can’t ship on time. Bluesky will see a surge in registrations but no change in DAU as they still haven’t supported video, so no one will stay on the site.
Why do you believe that about Mastodon?
Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
711–720 of 855 posts
Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
#712[flagged]
Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
#713I also think that anyone, especially someone prone to childish tantrums like Musk, having unquestionable control of a major network on which citizens can air their views, is also very dangerous. Free speech that is free of control is essential.
Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
#714That the tide turned against Musk when he undid the old Twitter censorship regime which was targeted towards primarily American conservatives. Since then, a lot of folks, including here and on major subreddits like news and politics, have openly wished harm on the site and on Musk. Here Musk was pushing back on illegal [1] censorship, and many people on this thread are celebrating the authoritarian judge responsible.…
Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
#715Earlier quoted context omitted.
What you describe is a flamewar maintenance algorithm. I mean, it COULD work if all people were sound and reasonable, but that's obviously not the case. And being a flamewar battleground is probably not the goal of most platform owners either. Also, for many topics that are not politics you don't need disagreement for a productive discussion.
> I mean, it COULD work if all people were sound and reasonable, but that's obviously not the case. But community notes works well. That's evidence that reasonableness emerges when you boost content that a diversity of people appreciate, regardless of whether people are sound and reasonable. > What you describe is a flamewar maintenance algorithm. Are you saying my idea will increase flamewars? I believe it should de…
Echo chambers aren't intrinsically bad, only when it's about politics and social issues - i. e. stuff that will affect everyone in the end.
Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
#716They will ban Bluesky too if it gets too popular .
Based on what evidence? IG, FB, WhatsApp, etc are all still running in Brazil last I checked.
Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
#717Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because X is not complying with the law in that country. Whether the law is right or not is irrelevant. You either comply or leave.
Brazilian here. We don't have rule of law here anymore. It's a covert dictatorship run at the front end by one judge, Alexandre de Moraes, and a small group of collaborators. He interprets the law however he wants or just outright ignores it in favor of ad hoc absurd interpretations, and there is no one left to judge the "supreme" judge. He effectively figures as accuser, defendant and judge in his own cases, which h…
On the surface it does not seem to make sense, apart from an emotional Bolsonaro==Trump==Bad argument.
I have watched Greenwald a couple of times on the Moraes topic, but never saw this addressed.
Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
#718Earlier quoted context omitted.
The linked documents describe the cartel and how it violated the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. It's not a difficult read.
Musk's lawyers "describing" something isn't evidence. Given Musk's personality, I would not be the tiniest bit surprised if he's suing without any actual evidence, just because he's angry and because he can. I mean, remember, this is the guy who tried to get out of buying Twitter, and then refused to pay out contractually-obligated packages to many of the former management team he fired. (I'm not the biggest fan in t…
As far as I am concerned, his contributions to the US, society, and the future via Tesla, SpaceX, Neuralink, etc., dwarf his various foibles.
P.S. if the pay packages were contractually obligated, then the courts would have forced him to pay them. Courts are generally pretty biased in favor of employees when they sue their employer.
P.P.S if his case has no merit, the advertisers are hardly unable to defend themselves, they are huge corporations. You don't need to feel sorry for them.
Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
#719Earlier quoted context omitted.
To be honest with the current polarisation levels in politics it's no longer possible to be neutral. The conservative side is now even strongarming companies into abandoning their diversity programs! This is just really not ok, I'm part of the LGBTIQ+ support network in our company and this kind of thing is really making waves. People are worried, even though we're a Europe based company where this is not a contested…
> The conservative side is now even strongarming companies into abandoning their diversity programs! This is just really not ok, I'm part of the LGBTIQ+ support network in our company and this kind of thing is really making waves. Sorry pal, you're going to have to make it on merits, not your gender or skin color. > See what happened to Ford, Jack Daniels, Harley Davidson, and many others. Decades of progress are bei…
I'm not advocating for positive discrimination. Just no discrimination at all.
It's very important to have the proper procedures in place for when that does happen. That was part of the diversity programs. Programs against bullying, education for managers on gender identity and how to deal with the difficulties around them, how to pick up on bullying etc. It's this kind of thing that I do myself (not as a job but as a voluntary side assignment in my job). It's amazing what kind of sexism and racism you hear when you go on a company trip and have a few drinks with high-level managers. So clearly this work is still highly needed.
Don't forget these programs were started because things were going the wrong way, people who were different than the standard cishetero white male had less chance to a job and were making less money when they did get one. This is of course not acceptable.
I don't think quotas are the answer. But rather fines when a company goes too far askew. "We only hire white cristians here" just cannot be acceptable.
> Racial quotas in the workplace is not progress.
That was only one small part of the diversity programs, and not one I necessarily agree with.
> Oh, so your boycotts are fine? Classic leftist hypocrisy.
I never said boycotts are wrong anyway. If right wingers want to boycott companies like Apple, go ahead.
Re: Brazil's X ban is sending lots of people to Bluesky
#720I left Xitter about 6 weeks ago and went all in on Bluesky. Took time to give feedback to the algo, but it's doing much better these days. I don't feel like I'm missing out on much, you'll get the same news & events on Bluesky. A lot of people who were scared of losing their following are reporting more, better engagement with lower follower counts. What I really like about it is the ATProto, which while imperfect, s…
> What I really like about it is the ATProto… DID, etc Is the PLC DID (the one all bluesy accounts use) still hardcoded to a single centralised provider?