arstechnica is taking the NY Times article and extrapolating too much. Confirmed? No it's not. It was suspected before, and it still is. And lost control would imply they could not control what it did to the target, which is incorrect. It did escape to the wild, but that's not really loosing control when it was designed to do nothing harmful on non target machines. Better to read the original, and the discussion on i…
Unless David E. Sanger is a new Jayson Blair, I'd say the connection is confirmed, not just suspected. There are no weasel words in the article, meaning both the journalist, his editor, and NYT are putting their reputation at stake. This is as strong as a newspaper story gets.
US and Israel created Stuxnet, lost control of it
71–80 of 321 posts
Re: US and Israel created Stuxnet, lost control of it
#72You know what's most surprising about this? That the developers, knowing fine well it was for a single target and the damage it could do in the wild, didn't implement a kill switch. Quite frankly cowboy coding like that is why we'll end up with Skynet becoming self-aware.
How do you put a kill switch in? The entire point was for it to be on an offline system, and the traffic for it checking for Internet to in turn check for an order like that might have given the game away. It sounds like they had something to check it wasn't outside and someone just screwed up.
Re: US and Israel created Stuxnet, lost control of it
#73I'm going to take the contrarian view here. If Iran had gotten to the point of enriching uranium to weapons-grade levels and Israel had done a pre-emptive strike, that would have gotten messy real fast. More messy than this. Disabling their centrifuges in a way where presumably no one died doesn't sound so bad to me considering the alternative. Again, just the contrarian viewpoint.
Re: US and Israel created Stuxnet, lost control of it
#74It's a new cold war. Eventually Iran will write viruses in return to attack US power grid. All fun and games until Homeland Security Theater is given new powers to raid your home and shoot your dog if they think your computer is being used as part of a botnet.
No, we are the aggressors here and I remain highly skeptical that Iran is even trying to do develop nuclear weapons. All the news outlets that speak English are biased as hell on this. If you want real news instead of propaganda you have to watch RT or Al Jazeera. Both of which condemn the US and Israel. Not Iran.
Edit: A karma 33 account. I've probably been trolled.
Re: US and Israel created Stuxnet, lost control of it
#75HIV (just to be clear, I have no clue wether HIV was assisted by some military programmes, but I can safely say such "mistakes" have been made in the past by the same army, like when they used to test nukes for example) Luckily this time it's a simple pc virus we can easily disassemble and counter - I think cyber war's still miles better than the alternatives.
I'm not sure how you can reasonably compare testing nuclear weapons to the supposed propagation of HIV, either. These two things have nothing in common.
Re: US and Israel created Stuxnet, lost control of it
#76Earlier quoted context omitted.
It got discovered, I would call that loosing control.
You're wrong. You can still be in control of a botnet (for example) even if it gets discovered and you can't spell 'losing'.
Re: US and Israel created Stuxnet, lost control of it
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
The centrifuges could have been destroyed, and with loss of human life. The system itself was damaged. I wouldn't call this a "cold" war. It is a very real, very physical war(albeit precisely targeted, for now).
The same sort of stuff used to happen during the Cold War with the Soviets [1]. Cold War doesn't mean no loss of life or destruction, just that there aren't two armies going at it on the battlefield. 1. http://www.damninteresting.com/the-farewell-dossier/
Re: US and Israel created Stuxnet, lost control of it
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
Some things are a question of right, some things are a question of need or interest. The US has enemies and it doesn't want them to have nuclear weapons.
Because it could ONLY be the US which doesn't want Iran to have nuclear weapons (or for that matter, all of the Middle East to be in a nuclear arms race). Right?
Historically speaking, USA is more likely to drop an atomic bomb than Iran (or any other country for that matter)
Re: US and Israel created Stuxnet, lost control of it
#79It's amusing that they 'lost control' of it because a simple bit of code along the lines of "if www.google.com resolves then shutdown" would be effective at detecting whether it was on the Internet or not.
What if google.com isn't resolvable from the host? The quality of person on HN has gone down hill.
Re: US and Israel created Stuxnet, lost control of it
#80I'm going to take the contrarian view here. If Iran had gotten to the point of enriching uranium to weapons-grade levels and Israel had done a pre-emptive strike, that would have gotten messy real fast. More messy than this. Disabling their centrifuges in a way where presumably no one died doesn't sound so bad to me considering the alternative. Again, just the contrarian viewpoint.