Live data from Hacker News

Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content

politico.com

621–630 of 1001 posts

Re: Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content

#621

It's funny because Facebook's news feed in the last couple years is unusable, filled with AI slop and clickbait. Twitter similarly requires aggressive use of block + mute to eliminate scams, clickbait, and other content I'm not interested in. I don't know if this is due to their changes in moderation policy, or if AI has overwhelmed them, but I vastly preferred the old news feeds

It was filled with slop long before ai slop though.

Re: Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content

#622

I wonder if this is coming up just before the election because of the Harris campaign’s suggested policy of capital gains tax on unrealised gains for people who have over $100m in assets? I think this is a great idea personally given what these people are doing to avoid paying tax including taking out loans against their own share portfolios. Worth thinking about what people are willing to do to not pay billions of d…

She didn’t even suggest that she supports that policy, it’s just assumed for some reason despite the fact that she’s already made her own choices on tax policy.

[flagged]

Re: Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content

#623
post #615

In Pavel's interview with Tucker Carlson, he mentions how he (VK) met with Zuckerberg, and he told them new features they were planning. And Zuck nicked them all. Zuck is on a major PR campaign drive, I would not trust a word he says.

Tuckster is an "anti-elite" heir to a fortune who grew up in a castle. The only job he ever had was outrage baiting naive people. People like him are against regulation, but will clap any time big tech is dragged in front of congress. It's all a scam. You're being had. Why are you treating any part of his interviews as valid information.

[dead]

Re: Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content

#624

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is where I really feel my age. Every message board and chatroom (bbs, forums, irc, icq, aol, et all) on the young internet was virtually uncensored and a 100% free for all, yet we all mostly got by. You went to the places you knew to go to. The communities mostly self moderated by kicks/bans. It worked really well. So whats changed? Well, I have my thoughts, but one thing is for sure, as soon as the platform its…

The internet used to be primarily used by geekier, smarter, tech people, and it used to not be a good propaganda/manipulation target since only a subset of the population used it. Media/newspapers were still the primary propaganda channel. Now that the entire population uses it, the average IQ involved has plummeted, and the political and social payoff for manipulating it with inauthentic content is huge.

>Now that the entire population uses it, the average IQ involved has plummeted,

You are so full of yourself. HN is great proof that there is zero association between "self identifies as technical" and "intelligence"

Re: Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content

#625

In Pavel's interview with Tucker Carlson, he mentions how he (VK) met with Zuckerberg, and he told them new features they were planning. And Zuck nicked them all. Zuck is on a major PR campaign drive, I would not trust a word he says.

The same Pavel that visited Russia more than 50 times since his "exile" in 2014?. https://istories.media/en/news/2024/08/27/pavel-durov-has-vi...

[dead]

Re: Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content

#626
post #375

Actions speak louder than words. Just log onto Facebook and see what he wants you to see. I don't know what he thinks he is selling folks on, but it's mostly spam and garbage...

Engagement. In fact, IMO, trying to achieve engagement should be illegal psychological experimentation on humans, but I'm an outlier.

Re: Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content

#627

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Zuck Vs Elon on the 2028 presidential ticket would be.... something

[flagged]

Musk unbanned literal Nazis and people who posted CSAM, while also making "cisgender" an autoflagged word on Twitter.

Re: Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content

#628

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> want kids to be transitioned If you go back 4 years, Trans and Black Lives Matter very much dominated the DNC, and those topics today get barely a whistle. I read the whole DNC platform, it's very much not what it was a few years ago. Meanwhile the VP candidate on the other side has a non white, non Cristian wife and has very much repudiated the racist part of the party. I suspect that in 4-8 years you will have se…

[flagged]

Basically is doing a lot of non charitable work there.

Re: Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content

#629

Earlier quoted context omitted.

She didn’t even suggest that she supports that policy, it’s just assumed for some reason despite the fact that she’s already made her own choices on tax policy.

[flagged]

We had an entire convention last week where she shared her policies, as did her surrogates and supporters. She supports a $6k child tax credit not taxing unrealized gains. But if you want to feel victimized (?) by a hypothetical tax on people with >$100M unrealized gains go for it I guess.

Re: Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content

#630

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And if the asset is a farm?

How many $100m farms are there that are not part of publicly traded companies are there in the US? And again, this is for publicly traded stock portfolios. Private farms won’t be broken up… yet :-)

I actually met a farmer on the East coast from a mayflower time family. They have the same land and basically been doing the same thing for a couple centuries. According to the fed they are worth $50M.
Post reply on HN