Live data from Hacker News

NASA names headquarters after first Black female engineer Mary W. Jackson

axios.com

51–60 of 111 posts

Re: NASA names headquarters after first Black female engineer Mary W. Jackson

#51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s a symbolic gesture relax. While it irks you it might inspire a young black kid to become an astronomer or phisicist or astronaut. As a white there are plenty of inspiring people. Some of them have been power hungry and ruthless and nobody knows how many people they trampled on. Some of those are white symbols. Why not let balcks have their own?

I find it interesting when race is pointed out as a positive trait in some contexts but not others. E.g. a black engineer is a good inspiration for a black child because they are both black. Whereas if I showed my child a great white engineer because the engineer was white, I'd be criticised for being a racist. If race doesn't matter, why do we need more of x race as engineers? If race does matter, why isn't the curr…

Who would say you're racist for showing that white engineer?

Also...I'm not a minority, but I can imagine that if I looked around and there were none of my kind in a position of power, I'd start to think maybe I shouldn't be there.

You can show a white child a picture of a white professional all day long and personally I wouldn't call you a racist.

Re: NASA names headquarters after first Black female engineer Mary W. Jackson

#52

I've seen negative comments of people claiming this is fruitless and that it pretends to solve racism forever (here and elsewhere). No one involved in naming this thought that was the case. They are giving overdue recognition. I can't imagine why people would be negative about this besides feeling threatened.

There is nothing meritorious about being black, or being a female, or being white, or being male. You cannot choose your race, or your biological sex. You didn't earn these traits, and you aren't a better or worse human being for having any of them. The NASA HQ was named after somebody to celebrate traits they didn't earn or choose. There are plenty of engineers that were objectively better engineers (I'm sure there…

Sorry for the copypasta, but this actually moved me. I really didn't learn about these things:

> You learned about Helen Keller instead of W.E.B. DuBois

> You learned about the Watts and L.A. Riots, but not Tulsa or Wilmington.

> You learned that George Washington’s dentures were made from wood, rather than the teeth from slaves.

> You learned about black ghettos, but not about Black Wall Street.

More: https://www.democraticunderground.com/100213622838

It's truly insidious how systematic this is in our lives.

Re: NASA names headquarters after first Black female engineer Mary W. Jackson

#53
post #19

I've seen negative comments of people claiming this is fruitless and that it pretends to solve racism forever (here and elsewhere). No one involved in naming this thought that was the case. They are giving overdue recognition. I can't imagine why people would be negative about this besides feeling threatened.

NASA seems to have started a pattern of naming things after people featured in movies, rather than those who contributed deeply to its achievements. Re-naming the Dryden Center to the Armstrong Center appears to have been part of an unfortunate trend.

If only Neil Armstrong had accomplished something significant outside Hollywood, perhaps then he would be worthy of having a building at Edwards named after him, is what you're saying?

(he is a particularly bad exemplar of the point you are trying to make)

Re: NASA names headquarters after first Black female engineer Mary W. Jackson

#54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Overcoming sexism and racism is something to be proud of and for others to celebrate. Nobody's celebrating this person for their identity in isolation but overcoming a situation where all the odds are very much stacked against a person of such an identity. > If their achievements were that incredible, we would've heard much more about them. Plenty of white engineers had successful careers, contributed to their progra…

> The majority of things are named after white men to the exclusion of everyone else. That's because the majority of scientific achievements to date, have been by white men. I'm not celebrating that fact, I'm just pointing out the source of the statistic you've pointed out. The things weren't named because the person was a white male, they were named because of a tremendous achievement that happened to be made by a w…

Columbus didn't discover anything, or claim to, accurately at least. He went to his death thinking he'd found passage to India. He was also responsible for genocide.

Re: NASA names headquarters after first Black female engineer Mary W. Jackson

#55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That is one important way you fix the problem, by honouring again and again the few examples of minority success. Stop trying to prevent black people from receiving praise.

I hope you're joking. There is nothing more dishonoring and patronizing than to change the goal posts for somebody, just because of their race.

Speaking from your vast experience as a POC, I'm sure. I guess you'd be ok if I spoke for white people?

Re: NASA names headquarters after first Black female engineer Mary W. Jackson

#56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree and I’m not sure who’s downvoting you except people afraid of change.

It’s a gesture that doesn’t literally cost anything but can make blacks feel appreciated and some sort of justice, a symbolic one. And yet, some people’s ego won’t allow for that. They have nothing to loose and yet their ego is freaking out.

Yes, it must be because "their ego is freaking out". Lol....

This is the "they're scared of us" trope.

Re: NASA names headquarters after first Black female engineer Mary W. Jackson

#57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s a symbolic gesture relax. While it irks you it might inspire a young black kid to become an astronomer or phisicist or astronaut. As a white there are plenty of inspiring people. Some of them have been power hungry and ruthless and nobody knows how many people they trampled on. Some of those are white symbols. Why not let balcks have their own?

I find it interesting when race is pointed out as a positive trait in some contexts but not others. E.g. a black engineer is a good inspiration for a black child because they are both black. Whereas if I showed my child a great white engineer because the engineer was white, I'd be criticised for being a racist. If race doesn't matter, why do we need more of x race as engineers? If race does matter, why isn't the curr…

It's the same reason we have a black history month in the US but not a white history month, or the same reason we have gay pride month but not straight pride month.

It's because every month is a white history month, and every month is a straight pride month.

A white child in the US is very unlikely to get the impression that their race might make it hard or impossible for them to become an engineer, so there is no need or benefit to specifically pointing out to your child that some great engineer is white.

Not so for a black child. There is a very real possibility that their being black will make it harder for them to become an engineer. Being show other people who faced the same hardships and overcame them can help keep them from getting discouraged.

Re: NASA names headquarters after first Black female engineer Mary W. Jackson

#58

I've seen negative comments of people claiming this is fruitless and that it pretends to solve racism forever (here and elsewhere). No one involved in naming this thought that was the case. They are giving overdue recognition. I can't imagine why people would be negative about this besides feeling threatened.

There is nothing meritorious about being black, or being a female, or being white, or being male. You cannot choose your race, or your biological sex. You didn't earn these traits, and you aren't a better or worse human being for having any of them. The NASA HQ was named after somebody to celebrate traits they didn't earn or choose. There are plenty of engineers that were objectively better engineers (I'm sure there…

> The NASA HQ was named after somebody to celebrate traits they didn't earn or choose

to celebrate them for their achievements made while fighting uphill and exponentially harder than their white counterparts in a society rigged against them in uncountable avenues

Re: NASA names headquarters after first Black female engineer Mary W. Jackson

#59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The majority of things are named after white men to the exclusion of everyone else. That's because the majority of scientific achievements to date, have been by white men. I'm not celebrating that fact, I'm just pointing out the source of the statistic you've pointed out. The things weren't named because the person was a white male, they were named because of a tremendous achievement that happened to be made by a w…

Mate, shut up with the nonsense. There are many scientific concepts that originated in Asian/MiddleEastern civilizations that simply happen to have a European name because the latter person popularized it in the West.

the reason "politics" are so derided on this website is because these guys can't stop themselves from impulsively showing their true colors (and exposing the very endemic racism at hand in the process!) at the drop of a hat

Re: NASA names headquarters after first Black female engineer Mary W. Jackson

#60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> That's because the majority of scientific achievements to date, have been by white men. That's because everyone else was excluded. To overcome this pervasive and hostile environment takes exceptional ability.

Then solve the exclusion problem. Don't pretend it has already been solved by naming things after black people. It's like taking a painkiller and thinking your broken arm is fixed. Fix the problem, not the symptom.

One can do both, like we do with most diseases.
Post reply on HN