Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's your point? You said: > It's more economically efficient [..] to extend that person's leave than to arrange for two separate leaves This isn't about what's economically efficient, it's about what certain societies think is well spent money.
My point is literally the first sentence of my comment. > It's not "structurally sexism", it's biology.
And it is sexism to ignore the effects to womens careers if this is not shared.