Live data from Hacker News

California’s population shrinks for third straight year

sacbee.com

411–413 of 413 posts

Re: California’s population shrinks for third straight year

#411

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you moved to Texas specifically to get a bigger house for your money, then of course you are going to hate it. We moved to Austin-adjacent and downsized on the house. We put away about 100$k from the sale of our previous house, and used the rest for downpayment, netting us a The rest of the time, weather is nice, plenty of good food, plenty of things to do.

> During the periods of heat or cold, we now just peace out and travel, because we have ample cash to do so and still manage to put away for retirement. that's nice but is it a good long term solution? i presume you don't have any kids. i wonder how this approach would work once you have kids and they start school. or maybe you do have kids but they are much older and moved out or no plans for kids idk.

We don't have kids so yes it makes things easier. If we did have kids, we would optimize for other things.

Re: California’s population shrinks for third straight year

#412

Earlier quoted context omitted.

$150/night is about as cheap as you'll find in the Bay Area. It'll be too small for a family, probably in a shitty area. A few years ago you might've been able to swing that, but now? No.

When you are moving, you don't have to stay bang in the center of bay area. You can stay in Dublin or Morgan Hill while you look for a year long lease in the bay. Also, I moved 10 years ago. 20K to move is an absurd number that the poster pulled out of his ass, along with "living in dozens of states". Btw, I did manage to find a 180$ per night deal in the bay area at Hyatt house, complete with a kitchenette and utens…

You could stay in Fresno too, but the point is staying in a hotel in the Bay Area is expensive. A decade ago things were significantly less expensive out here.

Re: California’s population shrinks for third straight year

#413

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bulgaria has single payer health care, it's to the left of most leftist states in the USA. And it's funny you recognize the usage of "woke" as problematic, but you still use it. Actual liberal politics means schools, roads, health care, climate, etc. It means a social safety net and labour protections. All of that are universal in Europe while most of it is completely lacking, as I said in even the most "liberal" par…

Bulgaria has a _terrible_ single payer health care system, an astonishing level of corruption, a powerful mafia that basically controls the government, widespread racism against the gypsies, dislike for anything LGBT, and many more not so liberal things. Cherry-picking the single payer health care system is silly. If you haven't noticed, I am talking about modern-day progressives, not liberal policies. The term "woke…

> modern type of progressives obsessed with race, sex, gender, and such

In my experience, left wingers want civil rights for all the above, but are far from "obsessed" with those groups. Right wingers on the other hand..

Post reply on HN