Live data from Hacker News

Apple Sign In

techcrunch.com

411–420 of 544 posts

Re: Apple Sign In

#411

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My rule, and it is a semi-idiotic one, is "i don't impulse buy from independent merchant websites that don't support apple pay at checkout". I usually email them after, too. "I actually clicked through your instagram ad, looked at some clothes that looked nice, and didn't buy anything because I was on my phone and didn't want to make a new account and add credentials to my password manager. Have you considered adding…

I think it's not an idiotic idea, it's just that your idea of what counts as third-party payment support is a single smaller payment provider located mainly in the United States. I follow a similar policy, but in my case the third-party payment services are Paypal, Stripe, and Coinbase, all of which are reliable and don't require me to give financial data to the seller. Paypal seems to be near-universally supported o…

Note that PayPal gives away your email address, and I’m not a fan of that. If a third party wants my email address, they should ask me directly (and I’ll give them a unique one); PayPal shouldn’t distribute my email address for me.

Look, I use three email domains for online accounts, in addition to a unique address for each account — one domain that links to my actual identity (my public-facing, professional domain), one domain that’s somewhat anonymous, and one domain reserved for highly sensitive accounts, e.g. online banking, PayPal, AppleID, etc. And PayPal sharing my email address with third parties breaks the model, making my sensitive domain less secure.

Re: Apple Sign In

#412

According to the App Store review guidelines update posted today, Sign In with Apple will be required for any iOS app that implements a single-sign in button. "Sign In with Apple will be available for beta testing this summer. It will be required as an option for users in apps that support third-party sign-in when it is commercially available later this year." https://developer.apple.com/news/?id=06032019j

I'm really curious to see if this impacts enterprise apps that are configured by an administrator to use an internal SSO provider, or if this only applies to apps that allow users to sign up. For example, Slack can be (and is often) configured to use Okta or some other SSO provider. Does the Slack app have to implement some kind of support for Apple Sign In when such use cases are involved?

Apple have always had excellent Enterprise support on iOS, including "private apps" and what not. There is no reason to believe the same exception wouldn't be extended to Enterprise Devices and Apps.

Re: Apple Sign In

#413

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Fb and G screwed themselves by: forcing users to submit real cell phone numbers (no forwarding numbers allowed) and real names. I’m laughing all the way to the apple oauth signup. So tired of G and Fb abusing users

Apple now requires 2FA for new accounts created on an iPhone and for 2FA they require a phone number.

Hmmm that’s annoying then.

Re: Apple Sign In

#414

According to the App Store review guidelines update posted today, Sign In with Apple will be required for any iOS app that implements a single-sign in button. "Sign In with Apple will be available for beta testing this summer. It will be required as an option for users in apps that support third-party sign-in when it is commercially available later this year." https://developer.apple.com/news/?id=06032019j

Frankly as a consumer I am happy about this.

Even the existing Sign In with Facebook is implemented terribly by many apps, e.g. requiring me to enter my password in app instead of calling out to the Facebook app like maybe 50 of apps support properly.

I think honestly this comes from apps that are built with cross platform frameworks but its still frustrating.

Further more it drives me crazy new apps (and websites) released this year focused on mobile (e.g. pay for fuel at a fuel station with your phone) and I can't even auto complete the credit card or name using the new keyboard extensions because they somehow labelled the forms in a way apple can't figure out.

Re: Apple Sign In

#415

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Facebook/Google care about offering services to everyone on the planet, not just the richest that have more disposable income than most people have in lifetime savings. Compared to Apple that cares about you only to make you pay ever-increasing amounts of money to maintain membership in its closed ecosystems, and blocks off any sort of mixed-ecosystem use, it's a refreshing twist.

Tell that to your shadow profile

Turns out selling people’s information is quite lucrative.

Re: Apple Sign In

#416
post #3

Disposable, anonymous email forwarding is a massive step forward for privacy. I know we've all been doing it for a while, but this on a consumer level is fantastic.

If you don’t use apple, I just built this as a stand-alone product: https://idbloc.co

I like it! how long have you been around? Do you think Apple's product might bring more awareness to yours?

Re: Apple Sign In

#417

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Sensible people do not deliberately handcuff themselves to trillion dollar megacorps and then throw away the key. >Yes they do >It was because they didn’t want to be “green bubbles,” a reference to the fact that iMessage chats in the iPhone’s Messages app use blue bubbles while SMS chats are displayed with green bubbles Sorry, it seems to me like the story you're relating supports the point of the post you disagree…

Sensible people absolutely do choose a phone on the basis of how they're perceived by owning that phone. Perception has value. You can rail against society all you want, but the reality is your peers make and break you.

I guess to each their own - I don't consider that sensible. Personally I've never been in an environment where it was common to judge others for the model of their phone, and complying with that level of control over my life and decisions, even for a moderate social reward, doesn't seem sensible to me.

Re: Apple Sign In

#418
post #282

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apple doesn't, to the best of my knowledge, monetize data, either through ads or selling it to third parties. I'd welcome a clarification if I'm wrong.

https://searchads.apple.com/ They're monetizing user data/behavior. One example, I didn't search very hard. > User response is an important signal of ad relevance. If customers don’t tap on an ad, Apple Search Ads will stop showing it to them.

https://searchads.apple.com/privacy/

I think what you quoted is Apple saying "if no one is clicking on your ad we stop showing it to people".

Re: Apple Sign In

#419

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is Apple sensing weakness and dropping a bomb right on facebook’s doorstep. And they sidestep the anticompetitive angle by arguing that instant anonymous sign on is simply a better UX, which it is. Someone at Apple deserves a raise.

Lol, I doubt it. Apple is years late and sucks at doing the leg work of getting third parties to adopt its suck. Look at Apple Pay which was launched at the perfect time.

Always fun to see a comment that doesn't age well the moment it's posted.

Re: Apple Sign In

#420

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can’t define Apple’s market as iOS customers unless there are no alternatives to iOS, which there most certainly are.

I already have explained; there's no alternative to iOS for apple mobile devices unless you're willing to pay more than $500 for an equivalent level of android device. If Apple allows Android to be installed to Apple devices, then things can be different though.

This is true with any industry. There is no alternative from Honda unless you are willing to spend on another car.
Post reply on HN